References
- Bakanic, V., McPhail, C., & Simon, R. J. (1987). The manuscript review and decision making process. American Sociological Review, 52, 631–642.
- Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). A reliability-generalization study of journal peer reviews: A multilevel meta-analysis of inter-rater reliability and its determinants. PLoS ONE, 5, 1–10.
- Buckler, K. (2008). The quantitative/qualitative divide revisited: A study of published research, doctoral program curricula, and journal editor perceptions. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 383–403.
- Cicchetti, D. V. (1991). The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 119–135.
- Floyd, R. G., Cooley, K. M., Arnett, J. E., Fagan, T. K., Mercer, S. H., & Hingle, C. (2011). An overview and analysis of journal operations, journal publication patterns, and journal impact in school psychology and related fields. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 617–647.
- Laband, D. N., & Piette, M. J. (1994). Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 194–203.
- Lounds, J., Oakar, M., Knecht, K., Moran, M., Gibney, M., & Pressley, M. (2002). Journal editors’ views on the criteria a paper must meet to be publishable. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 338–347.
- Medoff, M. H. (2003). Editorial favoritism in economics? Southern Economic Journal, 70, 425–434.
- Miller, J. M. (2000). Criminological scholarship and race. A response to professors Ross and Edwards. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 245–249.
- Miller, J., & Perrucci, R. (2001). Back stage at social problems: An analysis of the editorial decision process, 1993-1996. Social Problems, 48, 93–110.
- Mustaine, E. E., & Tewksbury, R. (2008). Reviewers’ views on reviewing: An examination of the peer review process in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 19, 351–365.
- Newton, D. P. (2010). Quality and peer review of research: An adjudicating role for editors. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 17, 130–145.
- Ross, L. E., & Edwards, W. J. (1998). Publishing among African American criminologists: A devaluing experience? Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 29–40.
- Ross, L. E., & Edwards, W. J. (2000). Criminological scholarship and race. A rejoinder from Professors Ross and Edwards. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 251–255.
- Schreck, C. J. 2006. The editor’s farewell. Journal of Crime and Justice, 29, iv–v.
- Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2012). Cracking open the black box of the manuscript review process: A look inside justice quarterly. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 23, 399–422.