References
- Allen, B. M. (2008). All hype or real change: Has the digital revolution changed scholarly communication? Journal of Library Administration, 48, 59–68.10.1080/01930820802029391
- Beall, J. (2014, February 25). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (2nd ed.). Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access: http://scholarlyoa.com
- Beall, J. (2015a, January 1). Criteria for determining predatory open-access publishers (3rd ed.). Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access: http://scholarlyoa.com
- Beall, J. (2015b, November 10). List of stand alone journals. Retrieved from Scholarly Open Access: http://scholarlyoa.com
- Berger, M., & Cirasella, J. (2015). Beyond Beall’s list: Better understanding predatory publishers. Retrieved from http://crln.acrl.org/content/76/3/132.full.pdf+htm
- Bergman, S. (2006). The scholarly communication movement: Highlights and recent developments. Collection Building, 25, 108–128.10.1108/01604950610705989
- Boissy, R., & Schatz, B. (2011). Scholarly communications from the publisher perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 51, 476–484. doi:10.1080/01930826.2011.589355
- Brienza, C. (2012). Opening the wrong gate? The academic spring and scholarly publishing in the humanities and social sciences. Publishing Research Quarterly, 28, 159–171. doi:10.1007/s12109-012-9272-5
- Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2015, March 1). Budapest open access initiative. Retrieved from www.opensocietyfoundations.org/openaccess/
- Butler, D. (2013). Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature, 495, 433–435.
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2016a). Code of conduct for journal publishers. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Code%20of%20conduct%20for%20publishers%20FINAL_1_0.pdf
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2016b). Principles of transparency and best practices in scholarly publishing. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Principles%20of%20Transparency%20and%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Scholarly%20Publishing.pdf
- Crawford, W. (2016, January 29) ‘Trust me’: The other problem with 87% of Beall’s lists. Retrieved from http://walt.lishost.org/2016/01/trust-me-the-other-problem-with-87-of-bealls-lists/
- Curtis, J. W., & Thornton, S. (2013). Here’s the news: The annual report on the economic status of the profession, 2012–2013. Academe, 99, 4–19.
- Dadkhah, M., Elias, N., Jazi, M. D., Christova-Bagdassarian, V., & Abu-Elteen, K. H. (2015). A new challenge in the academic world: Earning real money and eminence by paper publishing. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 8, 73–75.
- Directory of Open Access Journals. (2016). Retrieved from https://doaj.org/
- Djuric, D. (2014). Penetrating the omerta of predatory publishing: The Romanian connection. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 183–202.
- Drake, M. A. (2007). Scholarly communication in turmoil. (cover story). Information Today, 24(2), 1–19.
- Evans, G., & Saponaro, M. (2012). Collection management basics (6th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
- Free-for-all; Academic publishing. (2013, May 04). The Economist, 407, 79. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21577035-open-access-scientific-publishing-gaining-ground-free-all
- Gabbidon, S. L., Higgins, G. E., & Martin, F. (2011). Moving through the faculty ranks: An exploratory study on the perceived importance of book publishing and publishing in peer-reviewed journals in criminology/criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22, 165–180.10.1080/10511253.2010.517767
- Hendricks, A. (2010). Bloggership, or is publishing a blog scholarship? A survey of academic librarians. Library Hi Tech, 28, 470–477. doi:10.1108/07378831011076701
- Hendrix, J. (2010). Checking out the future. ALA Office for Information Technology Policy (Policy Brief) 2(February), 1–24.
- Henry, G. (2003). Online publishing in the 21st century. D-Lib Magazine, 9(10), 1–11. doi:10.1045/october2003-henry
- Johnson, L., Heller, L., Kirstein, A., Mumenthaler, R., Becker, S., & Cummins, M. (2014). NMC horizon report: 2014 library edition. Austin, TX: New Media Consortium.
- Jump, P. (2012, August 2). Research intelligence – ‘predators’ who lurk in plain cite. The Times Higher Education Supplement, p. 22.
- Jump, P. (2014, May 5). Lecturer wins battle to erase name from board of ‘predatory’ journal. Times Higher Education. p. 9.
- Knoll, J. L. (2014). Open access journals and forensic publishing. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 42, 15–21.
- Kolata, G. (2013, April 7). Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://art.yale.edu/file_columns/0000/2306/kolata.pdf
- Lariviere, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. Plos/One, 10(6), 1–15. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
- Moghaddam, G. G. (2005). How electronic publishing changes the production and distribution of scholarly journals. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 42, 459–464.
- Moghaddam, G. G., & Urs, S. R. (2006). Electronic scholarly journals: A review of technical issues in digital environment. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 44, 235–245.
- Noga, K. E. (2007). Securitizing copyrights: An answer to the Sonny Bono copyright term extension act. Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, IX, 1–73.
- O’Doherty, S., & Boissy, B. (2009). Is there a future for the traditional subscription-based journal? The Serials Librarian, 56, 155–162. doi:10.1080/03615260802678582
- OMICS Publishing Group. (2015, March 1). Open access publishing. Retrieved from http://www.omicsonline.org/open-access-publication.php
- Pinfield, S. (2013). Is scholarly publishing going from crisis to crisis? Learned Publishing, 26, 85–88. doi:10.1087/20130204
- Robinson, M., & Scherlen, A. (2009). Publishing in criminology and criminal justice: Assessing journal editors’ awareness and acceptance of open acces. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 4, 98–117.
- Rubin, R. (2010). Foundations of library and information science. New York, NY: Neil Schuman.
- Shaw, V. (2009). Scholarly publishing: Reforms for user friendliness and system efficiency. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 40, 241–262. doi:10.3138/jsp.40.3.241
- Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
- Spears T. (2014, August 22). Bogus research printed for a price; Predatory journal. National Post, p. A6.
- Stratford, M. (2012, March 4). ‘Predatory’ online journals lure scholars who are eager to publish. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Predatory-Online-Journals/131047/
- Suber, P. (2004). A very brief introduction to open access. Retrieved from http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/brief.htm
- Tenopir, C., King, D. W., Edwards, S., & Wu, L. (2009). Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proceedings, 61, 5–32. doi:10.1108/00012530910932267
- Theodorou, R. (2010). OA repositories: The researchers’ point of view. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 13(3). doi:10.3998/3336451.0013.304
- Weibel, S. L. (2001). Scholarly publishing on the world wide web. Journal of Library Administration, 34, 73–80.10.1300/J111v34n01_11
- Wilson, K. (2013). Librarian vs. (open access) predator: An interview with Jeffrey Beall. Serials Review, 39, 125–128.10.1080/00987913.2013.10765505
- Young, P. (2015, May 19). A response to Jeffrey Beall’s critique of open access. Retrieved from https://blogs.lt.vt.edu/openvt/2015/05/19/a-response-to-jeffrey-bealls-critique-of-open-access/