Beyond Neighborhood Quality: The Role of Residential Instability, Employment Access, and Location Affordability in Shaping Work Outcomes for HOPE VI Participants

References

• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16, 297–324. 10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., Haas, P., Heffernan, K., Markarewicz, C., Scheu, R., & Star, A. (2007). Growing more affordably: Connecting the dots on housing, energy and transportation costs. Coral Gables, FL. Retrieved from http://www.fundersnetwork.org/files/learn/Housing_Energy_Transportation_April_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg, E. (2004). En-gendering effective planning: Spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70, 269–281. doi:10.1080/01944360408976378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S., & Turner, M. A. (2006). Assisted housing mobility and the success of low-income minority families: Lessons for policy, practice, and future research. Northwestern Journal of Law and Social Policy, 1, 25–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of the Census. (2014). 2009–2013 American Community Survey estimates. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., Sandoval, O., & Landis, J. (2002). Transportation as a stimulus of welfare-to-work: Private versus public mobility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 50–63. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202200105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlotte Housing Authority. (2015). Administrative data. Charlotte, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2015). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility: childhood exposure effects and county-level estimate, (May). Retrieved from http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/images/nbhds_paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cisneros, H. (2009). Program origins and defining principles. In H. G. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From Despair to Hope: HOPE VI and the New Promise of Public Housing in America’s Cities (pp. 3–13). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004). Moving over or moving up? Short-term gains and losses for relocated HOPE vi families. Cityscape, 7, 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Massey, D. (2008). Neighborhood effects on economic self-sufficiency: A reconsideration of the moving to opportunity experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 107–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. E., Curley, A. M., Clay, C., & Lara, R. (2005). Evaluation of social services in a HOPE VI housing development: Resident and staff perceptions of successes and barriers. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 47–59. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comey, J. (2004). An improved living environment? Housing quality outcomes for HOPE VI relocatees (No. #2). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://webarchive.urban.org/publications/311058.html
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2009). HOPE VI budget guidance. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=DOC_9877.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2010). About HOPE VI. Retrieved from http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph/hope6/about
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013). Data and methodology: Location Affordability Index. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.locationaffordability.info/LAPMethodsV2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, M., & Perkins, K. L. (2016). Housing and household instability. Urban Affairs Review, 52, 421–436. doi:10.1177/1078087415589192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Briggs, X. D. S. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 177–221. 10.1080/10511482.1998.9521290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza Briggs, X. D. S., Popkin, S. J., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to opportunity. USA: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393712.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Fullilove, M. T. (2004). Root shock: How tearing up city neighborhoods hurts America and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Hayes, C., & Johnson, J. (2005). Identifying robust, parsimonious neighborhood indicators. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 265–280. 10.1177/0739456X04267717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlock, S. 2014. By 2011, Atlanta had demolished all of its public housing projects. Where did all those people go? The Atlantic Citylab. Retrieved from www.citylab.com.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2010). Better neighborhoods, better outcomes? Explaining relocation outcomes in HOPE VI. Cityscape, 1, 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2012). Obsolescence and the transformation of public housing communities in the US. International Journal of Housing Policy, 12, 331–345. doi:10.1080/14616718.2012.709671
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2013). The audacity of HOPE VI: Discourse and the dismantling of public housing. Cities, 35, 342–348. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauan, S., & Douglas, S. (2004). Potential employment liabilities among TANF recipients: A synthesis of data from six state TANF caseload studies. Health (San Francisco). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/leavers99/emp-liab04/
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. (1991). The spatial mismatch hypothesis: What has the evidence shown? Urban Studies, 28, 105–122. doi:10.1080/00420989120080071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jargowsky, P. A. (1997). Poverty and place: Ghettos, Barrios, and the American City. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Center for Housing Studies. (2014). The state of the nation’s housing 2014. Cambridge, MA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/research/state_nations_housing
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. (2006). Is mixed income development an antidote to urban poverty? Housing Policy Debate, 17, 209–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, M., & Chaskin, R. (2010). Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies, 47, 2347–2366. doi:10.1177/0042098009357959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kain, J. F. (1968). Housing segregation, negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, 175–197. 10.2307/1885893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawabata, M., & Shen, Q. (2006). Job accessibility as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure: A comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, 115–130. doi:10.1068/b31144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene, D. E., & Geronimus, A. T. (2011). “Weathering” HOPE VI: The importance of evaluating the population health impact of public housing demolition and displacement. Journal of Urban Health, 88, 417–435. 10.1007/s11524-011-9582-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, T. G. (1999). Building and operating neighborhood indicator systems: A guidebook. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance. Urban Studies, 45, 2449–2470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. K., & Woolley, M. (2007). Relocation is not enough: Employment barriers among HOPE VI families (No. #6). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T., Rohe, W. M., & Cowan, S. M. (2012). Entrenched hybridity in public housing agencies in the USA. Housing Studies, 27, 457–475. 10.1080/02673037.2012.677998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T., Rohe, W. M., Frescoln, K. P., Webb, M. D., Donegan, M., & Han, H.-S. (2016). Mobilizing social capital: Which informal and formal supports affect employment outcomes for HOPE VI residents? Housing Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/02673037.2016.1140724
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., & Burchfield, K. (2009). Out of the projects, still in the hood: The spatial constraints on public-housing residents’ relocation in chicago. Journal of Urban Affairs, 31, 589–614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., Fraser, J., & Bazuin, J. (2015). The imagined self-sufficient communities of HOPE VI: Examining the community and social support component. Urban Affairs Review, 51, 726–746. doi:10.1177/1078087414544461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., Ward, C., Reid, L., & Ruel, E. (2011). The poverty deconcentration imperative and public housing transformation. Sociology Compass, 5, 824–833. 10.1111/soco.2011.5.issue-9
   Google Scholar
• Phinney, R., Danziger, S., Pollack, H. A., & Seefeldt, K. (2007). Housing instability among current and former welfare recipients. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 832–837. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.082677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J. (2010). A glass half empty? New evidence from the HOPE VI Panel Study. Housing Policy Debate, 20, 43–63. doi:10.1080/10511481003599852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., & Cove, E. (2007). Safety is the most important thing (No. #2). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., & Buron, L. F. (2009). Has HOPE VI transformed residents' lives? New evidence from the HOPE VI panel study. Housing Studies, 24, 477–502. doi:10.1080/02673030902938371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., Cunningham, M. K., & Buron, L. F. (2004). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Housing Policy Debate, 15, 385–414. doi:10.1080/10511482.2004.9521506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberto, E. (2008). Commuting to opportunity: The working poor and commuting in the United States. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://web.stanford.edu/group/scspi/_media/pdf/key_issues/transportation_policy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Nguyen, M. T., Webb, M. D., & Frescoln, K. P. (2014). Boulevard homes HOPE VI second interim report. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T., Shen, Q., & Peng, Z.-R. (2004). Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in us metropolitan areas. Urban Studies, 41, 1313–1331. doi:10.1080/0042098042000214815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey, P., & Sampson, R. J. (2010). Destination effects: Residential mobility and trajectories of adolescent violence in a stratified metropolis. Criminology, 48, 639–681. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.021.Secreted
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegeler, P. 2007. Connecting families to opportunity: The next generation of housing mobility policy. In B. Smedley & A. Jenkins (Eds.), All things being equal: Instigating opportunity in an inequitable time (pp 79–95). New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G. L. (1997). Transit accessibility and labor force participation rate of at-risk groups: Dade county. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/20000/20100/20102/PB98109796.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tomer, A., Kneebone, E., Puentes, R., & Berube, A. (2011). Missed opportunity: Transit and jobs in metropolitan America. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2011/05/12-jobs-and-transit
   Google Scholar
• Turbov, M., & Piper, V. (2005). HOPE VI and mixed-finance redevelopments: A catalyst for neighborhood renewal. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2005/9/metropolitanpolicypiper/20050913_hopevi
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant-based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 373–394. 10.1080/10511482.1998.9521299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of North Carolina-Charlotte. (2013). 2012 Quality of life survey. Charlotte, NC: City of Charlotte.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2003). Housing vouchers and residential mobility. Journal of Planning Literature, 18, 17–30. 10.1177/0885412203254333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardrip, K. (2011). Public transit’s impact on housing costs: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: Insights From Housing Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziol-Guest, K. M., & McKenna, C. C. (2014). Early childhood housing instability and school readiness. Child Development, 85, 103–113. doi:10.1111/cdev.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar