Consolidating ZIP Codes for Small Area Fair Market Rents: A Method for Implementing the New Rule

References

• Bach, V., Goldiner, J., & Fee, R. (2016). Comment to establishing a more effective Fair Market Rent system: Using Small Area Fair Market Rents in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of current 50th percentile FMRs. New York, NY: Community Service Society, The Legal Aid Society, and New York Housing Conference Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, C. (2016). The Small Area Fair Market Rent system in the Richmond Region: An evaluation of current voucher concentration, Move to Opportunity counseling, and value capture planning. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2015). The impacts of neighborhoods on intergenerational mobility: Childhood exposure effects and county-level estimates. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, R., & Ganong, P. (2015). The incidence of housing voucher generosity. Boston, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, M., & Ross, A. (2015). Housing vouchers and the price of rental housing. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3), 154–176. doi:10.1257/pol.20130064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, C. (2015). Comments on Docket No. FR-5855-A-01 Establishing a more effective Fair Market Rent (FMR) system: Using Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMRs) in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of the current 50th percentile FMRs; Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking. Washington, DC: National Housing Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2015). Neighborhood-based subsidy caps can make housing vouchers more efficient and effective. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2016). HUD should act promptly to broaden opportunity for voucher holders. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, W. (2017). Trump administration blocks housing voucher policy that would expand opportunity and reduce costs. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2003). The segregation of ancestry groups in San Antonio. The Social Science Journal, 40(2), 213–232. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, P. B., & Newton, G. B. (2013). The Small Area FMR demonstration. Cityscape, 15, 325–328.
   Google Scholar
• Khadduri, J., & Wilkens, C. (2007). Designing subsidized rental housing programs: What have we learned? ( Working Paper RR07-5.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Joint Center for Housing Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Knudse, B., Rich, J., & Dixon, M. (2016). Comment to establishing a more effective Fair Market Rent system: Using Small Area Fair Market Rents in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of current 50th percentile FMRs. Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K., Schwartz, A., & Taghavi, L. (2015). Housing Choice Voucher location patterns a decade later. Housing Policy Debate, 25, 215–233. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.921223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, S., & Oppenheimer, S. (2017). Expanding the toolbox: Promising approaches for increasing geographic choice. Tukwila, WA: King County Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. O. (2008). Getting more from low-income housing assistance. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Public Housing Authorities Directors Association (PHADA). (2016). HUD plans to set metropolitan Fair Market Rents for very small areas: Demonstration program’s risks could outweigh benefits. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, M. R. (2014). City of Dallas fair housing symposium. Dallas, TX: Dallas Housing Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, L., Katz, L. F., Lugwig, J., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., Kessler, R. C., … Lindau, S. T. (2011). Moving to Opportunity for fair housing demonstration program - Final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban and Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, M. H., & Wachter, S. M. (2001). Principles to guide housing policy at the beginning of the Millennium. Cityscape, 15, 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Stromberg, B., & Zimmerman, J. (2016). The potential impact of the Small-Area Fair Market Rents methodology. Washington, DC: National Housing Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Susin, S. (2002). Rent vouchers and the price of low-income housing. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 109–152. doi:10.1016/s0047-2727(01)00081-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2016a). Establishing a more effective Fair Market Rent system: Using Small Area Fair Market Rents in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of current 50th percentile FMRs. Proposed rule. Federal Register, 81, 39218–39234.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2016b). Establishing a more effective Fair Market Rent system: Using Small Area Fair Market Rents in Housing Choice Voucher program instead of current 50th percentile FMRs. Final rule. Federal Register, 81, 80567–80587.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2017a). Proposed changes to the methodology used for estimating Fair Market Rents. Federal Register, 82, 24377–24381.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2017b). Letter to PHA Executive Directors on the Suspension of Small Area FMRs. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Evans, A., & Atherwood, S. (2015). Addressing the affordable housing crisis for vulnerable renters: Insights from Broward County on an affordable housing acquisition tool. Housing Policy Debate, 26(1), 123–149. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.1003190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Li, Y., & Atherwood, S. (2015). Moving to Opportunity? An examination of Housing Choice Vouchers on urban poverty deconcentration in South Florida. Housing Studies, 30(7), 1064–1091. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1009004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Foote, N., Cordoba, H., & Sparks, C. (2017). Historic roots of modern residential segregation in a southwestern metropolis: San Antonio, Texas in 1910 and 2010. Urban Science.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Wang, R., & Jones, S. (2017). Comparing opportunity metrics and locational outcomes in the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X1771122
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., & Walter, R. (2017). Tracking mobility in the Housing Choice Voucher program: A household level examination in Florida, USA. Housing Studies. doi:10.1080/02673037.2017.1347608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warth, G. (2017). New plan could increase voucher value in higher-rent areas. San Diego, CA: The San Diego Union-Tribune.
   Google Scholar