620
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How Vehicle Access Enables Low-Income Households to Live in Better Neighborhoods

, &
Pages 920-939 | Received 28 Jun 2017, Accepted 25 Jun 2018, Published online: 07 Sep 2018

References

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1992). Analyzing locational attainments: Constructing individual-level regression models using aggregate data. Sociological Methods & Research, 20, 367–397.
  • Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Arnott, R. (1987). Economic theory and housing. In E. S. Mills (Ed.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 2, pp. 959–988). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Bayer, P., McMillan, R., & Rueben, K. S. (2004). What drives racial segregation? New evidence using Census microdata. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(3), 514–535.
  • Blumenberg, E., & Pierce, G. (2014). A driving factor in mobility? Transportation’s role in connecting subsidized housing and employment outcomes in the moving to opportunity (MTO) program. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(1), 52–66.
  • Blumenberg, E., Pierce, G., & Smart, M. (2015). Transportation access, residential location, and economic opportunity: Evidence from two housing voucher experiments. Cityscape, 17(2), 89–111.
  • Borjas, G. J. (1998). To ghetto or not to ghetto: Ethnicity and residential segregation. Journal of Urban Economics, 44(2), 228–253.
  • Briggs, X. D. S., Popkin, S. J., & Goering, J. (2010). Moving to opportunity: The story of an American experiment to fight ghetto poverty. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Carlson, D., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (2012). Long-term effects of public low-income housing vouchers on neighborhood quality and household composition. Journal of Housing Economics, 21, 101–120.
  • Cervero, R., Sandoval, O., & Landis, J. (2002). Transportation as a stimulus of welfare-to-work: Private versus public mobility. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, 50–63.
  • Chapman, D. W., & Lombard, J. R. (2006). Determinants of neighborhood satisfaction in fee-based gated and nongated communities. Urban Affairs Review, 41(6), 769–799.
  • Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004). HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate, 15, 415–447.
  • Clark, W. A. V., Deurloo, M. C., & Dieleman, F. M. (1990). Household characteristics and tenure choice in the U.S. housing market. The Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 5(3), 251–270.
  • Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. New Jersey, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers – State University of New Jersey.
  • Couture, V., & Handbury, J. (2017). Urban revival in America, 2000 to 2010. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/couture/download/Couture_Handbury_Revival.pdf).
  • Dawkins, C., Jeon, J. S., & Pendall, R. (2015a). Transportation access, rental vouchers, and neighborhood satisfaction: Evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. Housing Policy Debate, 25(3), 497–530.
  • Dawkins, C., Jeon, J. S., & Pendall, R. (2015b). Vehicle access and exposure to neighborhood poverty: Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity program. Journal of Regional Science, 55(5), 687–707.
  • Dawkins, C. J. (2005). Evidence on the intergenerational persistence of residential segregation by race. Urban Studies, 42(3), 545–555.
  • Devine, D. J., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L., & Taghavi, L. B. (2002). Housing Choice Voucher location patterns: Implications for participant and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research, Division of Program Monitoring and Research.
  • Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294.
  • Freeman, L. (2008). Is class becoming a more important determinant of neighborhood attainment for African-Americans? Urban Affairs Review, 44(1), 3–26.
  • Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 7–43.
  • Galvez, M. (2010). What do we know about Housing Choice Voucher program location outcomes? A review of recent literature. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
  • Giuliano, G., & Small, K. A. (1993). Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Studies, 30(9), 1485–1500.
  • Glaeser, E. L., Kahn, M. E., & Rappaport, J. (2008). Why do the poor live in cities? The role of public transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(1), 1–24.
  • Grubb, W. N. (1982). The flight to the suburbs of population and employment, 1960–1970. Journal of Urban Economics, 11(3), 348–367.
  • Gurley, T., & Bruce, D. (2005). The effects of car access on employment outcomes for welfare recipients. Journal of Urban Economics, 58, 250–272.
  • Hamilton, B. W. (1982). Wasteful commuting. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1035–1053.
  • Ihlanfeldt, K. R., & Scafidi, B. P. (2002). Black self-segregation as a cause of housing segregation: Evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality. Journal of Urban Economics, 51(2), 366–390.
  • Jacob, B. A. (2004). Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago. American Economic Review, 94(1), 233–258.
  • John, C. S., & Clark, F. (1984). Racial differences in dimensions of neighborhood satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 15, 43–60.
  • Kearney, A. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 112–139.
  • Klein, N. J., & Smart, M. J. (2017). Car today, gone tomorrow: The ephemeral car in low-income, immigrant and minority families. Transportation, 44(3), 495–510.
  • LeRoy, S. F., & Sonstelie, J. (1983). Paradise lost and regained: Transportation innovation, income, and residential location. Journal of Urban Economics, 13, 67–89.
  • McClure, K. (2010). The prospects for guiding Housing Choice Voucher households to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 12(3), 101–122.
  • Mieszkowski, P., & Mills, E. S. (1993). The causes of metropolitan suburbanization. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 135–147.
  • Muth, R. (1969). Cities and housing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nguyen, Q. C., Acevedo-Garcia, D., Schmidt, N. M., & Osypuk, T. L. (2017). The effects of a housing mobility experiment on participants’ residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 27(3), 419–448. doi:10.1080/10511482.2016.1245210
  • Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 881–910.
  • Pendall, R., Hayes, C., George, A., (Taz), Casey, D., Jae Sik, J., Elijah, K., … Michael, S. (2014). Driving to opportunity: Understanding the links among transportation access, residential outcomes, and economic opportunity for housing voucher recipients. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/22461/413078-Driving-to-Opportunity-Understanding-the-Links-among-Transportation-Access-Residential-Outcomes-and-Economic-Opportunity-for-Housing-Voucher-Recipients.pdf. URL
  • Pendall, R., Hayes, C., George, A., (Taz), Casey, D., Jae Sik, J., Elijah, K., … Michael, S. (2015). Driving to opportunities: Voucher users, cars, and movement to sustainable neighborhoods. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 17(2), 57–87.
  • Pucher, J., & Renne, J. L. (2003). Socioeconomics of urban travel: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transportation Quarterly, 57(3), 49–77.
  • Rabe, B., & Taylor, M. (2010). Residential mobility, quality of neighbourhood and life course events. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 173(3), 531–555.
  • Raphael, S., Berube, A., & Deakin, E. (2006). Socioeconomic differences in household automobile ownership rates: Implications for evacuation policy. Unpublished MS. Retrieved from http://gsppi.berkeley.edu/faculty/sraphael/berubedeakenraphael.pdf.
  • Rosenblatt, P., & Stephanie, D. (2012). We don’t live outside, we live in here: Neighborhood and residential mobility decisions among low-income families. City & Community, 11(3), 254–284.
  • Sampson, R. J. (2008). Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 189–231.
  • Sanbonmatsu, L., Jens Ludwig, L. F., Katz, L. A., Gennetian, G. J., Duncan, R. C., Kessler, E. A., … Lindau, S. T. (2011). Moving to opportunity for fair housing demonstration program – Final impacts evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
  • Schwartz, A. F. (2010). Housing policy in the United States: An introduction. New York: Routledge.
  • Shroder, M. (2002). Locational constraint, housing counseling, and successful lease-up in a randomized housing voucher experiment. Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 315–338.
  • Song, W, & Keeling, K. (2010). Location patterns of Section 8 housing in Jefferson County, Kentucky. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research, 1(2), 1–18.
  • Talen, E., & Koschinsky, J. (2011). Is subsidized housing in sustainable neighborhoods? Evidence from Chicago. Housing Policy Debate, 21(1), 1–28.
  • Turner, M. A., Rob Santos, D. K., Levy, D. W., Aranda, C., & Pitingolo, R. (2013). Housing discrimination against racial and ethnic minorities 2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2001). Guidance for HUD field offices to conduct annual Section 8 management assessment program (SEMAP) assessments. Washington, DC: Public and Indian Housing, Author. Retrieved from https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/pih2001-6.pdf
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2008). Housing Choice Voucher Program guidebook. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/hcv/forms/guidebook.cfm
  • U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2012). FHEA Data Documentation (Draft). Washington, DC: Author.
  • U.S. Department of Transportation. (2014). FHWA NHTS Brief: Mobility Challenges for Households in Poverty. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://nhts.ornl.gov/briefs/PovertyBrief.pdf
  • Varady, D. (2010). What should housing vouchers do? A review of the recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25, 391–407.
  • Varady, D. P., & Walker, C. C. (2007). Neighborhood choices: Section 8 housing vouchers and residential mobility. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
  • Weinberg, D. H., Friedman, J., & Mayo, S. K. (1981). Intraurban residential mobility: The role of transactions costs. Market imperfections, and household disequilibrium. Journal of Urban Economics, 9(3), 332–348.
  • Woldoff, R. A. (2008). Wealth, human capital and family across racial/ethnic groups: Integrating models of wealth and locational attainment. Urban Studies, 45(3), 527–551.
  • Yang, Y. (2008). A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in Metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), 307–323.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.