The Growth of Control? Changes in Local Land-Use Regulation in Major U.S. Metropolitan Areas From 1994 to 2003

References

• Albrecht, D. E., Bultena, G. L., & Hoiberg, E. O. (1986). Constituency of the antigrowth movement: A comparison of the growth orientations of urban status groups. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 21(4), 607–616.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler, A. A., & Gómez-Ibáñez, J. A. (1993). Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ambinakudige, S., Parisi, D., Cappello, G. C., & Lotfata, A. (2017). Diversity or segregation? A multi-decadal spatial analysis of demographics of Atlanta neighborhoods. Spatial Demography, 5(2), 123–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldassare, M., & Protash, W. (1982). Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratt, R., & Vladeck, A. (2014). Addressing restrictive zoning for affordable housing: Experiences in four states. Housing Policy Debate, 24(3), 594–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., Listokin, D., & Galley, C. C. (2000). Smart Growth: More than a ghost of urban policy past, less than a bold new horizon. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 821–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calavita, N., & Mallach, A. (eds). (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, L. C., & Burby, R. J. (1994). Mandates, plans, and planners: Building local commitment to development management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 60(4), 444–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, M. N. (1976). The politics of exclusion. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method (Vol. 19). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (2001). What does “Smart Growth” really mean? Planning, 67(4), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (2001). The homevoter hypothesis: How home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler, R. (1998). The metropolitan dimension of early zoning: Revisiting the 1916 New York City ordinance. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), 170–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frieden, B. (1979). The environmental protection hustle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furman, J. (2015, November 15). Barriers to shared growth: The case of land use regulation and economic rents. Oral remarks at Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R., Brower, D. J., McBennett, L. D., Vestat, B. A., & Herr, D. (1979). Constitutional issues of growth management. Washington, DC: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottdiener, M., & Neiman, M. (1981). Characteristics of support for local growth control. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 17(1), 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., & Molloy, M. (2015). Regulation and housing supply. In G. J. Duranton, V. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics. Volume 5B. Handbook of regional and urban economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. (2008). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index. Urban Studies, 45(3), 693–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1988). Cities of tomorrow: An intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, A. L., Jr., Higginbotham, F. M., & Ngcobo, S. S. (1990). De jure housing segregation in the United States and South Africa: The difficult pursuit for racial justice. University of Illinois Law Review, 4, 763–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. (2007). How plan mandates work: Affordable housing in Illinois. Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(1), 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1898). Tomorrow: A peaceful path to real reform. London, UK: Swan Sonnenschein.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.-T., & Moretti, E. (2015). Why do cities matter? Local growth and aggregate growth. (NBER Working Paper No. 21154). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Karki, T. K. (2015). Mandatory versus incentive-based state zoning reform policies for affordable housing in the United States: A comparative assessment. Housing Policy Debate, 25(2), 234–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosman, J. (1993). Toward an inclusionary jurisprudence: A reconceptualization of zoning. Catholic University Law Review, 43, 59–108.
   Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C., & Monkkonen, P. (2016). Do strict land use regulations make metropolitan areas more segregated by income? Journal of the American Planning Association, 82(1), 6–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, H. J. (1983). Managing Oregon’s growth: The politics of development planning. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (2nd ed). Thousands Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhija, V., Regus, L., Slovin, S., & Das, A. (2010). Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. (2002). How do we know Smart Growth when we see it? In T. S. Szold & A. Carbonell (Eds.), Smart Growth: Form and consequences (pp. 82–101). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., Burby, R. J., Feser, E., Dawkins, C. J., Malizia, E. E., & Quercia, R. (2004). Urban containment and central-city revitalization. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T. (2009). Why do communities mobilize against growth: Growth pressures, community status, metropolitan hierarchy, or strategic interaction? Journal of Urban Affairs, 31(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odland, R. (1991). Growth management: What California can learn from the Sunshine State. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 24, 1109–1130.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (1995). Residential growth controls and racial and ethnic diversity: Making and breaking the chain of exclusion. (Dissertation thesis). Berkeley, CA: City and Regional Planning, University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Local land-use regulation and the chain of exclusion. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(2), 125–142. doi:10.1080/01944360008976094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2001). Municipal plans, state mandates, and property rights. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(2), 154–165. doi:10.1177/0739456X0102100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R., Martin, J., & Fulton, W. (2002). Holding the line: Urban containment in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, R. V., & Howard, K. (2013). The glass floor: Education, downward mobility, and opportunity hoarding. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Children and Families.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways. Washington, DC: Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, The Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., … Kattan, M. W. (2010). Assessing the performance of prediction models: A framework for some traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 21(1), 128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, G., Ewing, R., & Greene, W. (2015). Desire for Smart Growth: A survey of residential preferences in the Salt Lake region of Utah. Housing Policy Debate, 25(3), 446–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2012, September). Patterns of metropolitan and micropolitan population change, 2000 to 2010. 2010 Census Special Reports, Report #C20105R-01.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. A. (1987). The rise of the community builders. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar