Taking Stock: What Drives Landlord Participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program

References

• American Community Survey, 1-Year. (2015). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, Victoria, & Nguyen, M T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), 297–324. doi:10.1080/10511482.2005.9521546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobo, L., & Zubrinsky, C. L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice? Social Forces, 74(3), 883–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., & Stefanie, D. (2017). Fieldwork with in-depth interviews: How to get strangers in the city to tell you their stories. In J. M. Oakes and J. S. Kaufman (Eds.), Methods in social epidemiology. (pp. 239–253). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. D. S. (2005). The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902. doi:10.1257/aer.20150572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, R., & Ganong, P. (2016). The incidence of housing voucher generosity (Working Paper). New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, R., & Ganong, P. (2017). How do changes in housing voucher design affect rent and neighborhood quality? American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(2), 62–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Garboden, P., & Rosenblatt, P. (2013). Segregating shelter: How housing policies shape the residential locations of low-income minority families. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 268–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S, & Rosenblatt, P. (2017). Walking away from the wire: Housing mobility and neighborhood opportunity in Baltimore. Housing Policy Debate, 27(4), 519–546. doi:10.1080/10511482.2017.1282884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, S., Wood, H., & Rosenblatt, P. (Forthcoming). Why poor families move (and where they go): Reactive Mobility and Residential Decisions. City and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2001. Housing choice voucher program guidebook. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Desmond, M., & Perkins, K. L. (2016). Are landlords overcharging housing voucher holders? City & Community, 15(2), 137–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. (2012). Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 118(1), 88–133. doi:10.1086/666082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and profit in the American city. (1st ed.). New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participant and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PD&R.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L., & Taghavi, L. B. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participant and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., DeLuca, S., & Owens, A. (2012). Constrained compliance: Solving the puzzle of MTO’s lease-up rates and why mobility matters. Cityscape 14(2).
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., & Buron, L. (2001). Study on Section 8 voucher success rates: Quantitative study of success rates in metropolitan areas (pp. 1–134). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PD&R.
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, M., Dastrup, S., Burnett, K., Alvarez, T., Climaco, C., & de, Sousa, T. (2017). Small Area Fair Market rent demonstration evaluation. Interim report. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. (2012). The impact of source of income laws on voucher utilization. Housing Policy Debate, 22(2), 297–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L., & Yunjing, L. (2013). Do source of income anti-discrimination laws facilitate access to less disadvantaged neighborhoods? Housing Studies, 29(1), 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garboden, P., & Rosen, E. (Forthcoming). The threat of eviction: How landlords shape a contingent tenure. City & Community.
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2014). More than meets the market? Landlord agency in the Illinois Housing Choice Voucher Program. Housing Policy Debate, 24(3), 500–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greif, M. (Forthcoming). Regulating landlords: Unintended consequences for poor tenants. City and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartung, J. M., & Henig, J. R. (1997). Housing vouchers and certificates as a vehicle for deconcentrating the poor evidence from the Washington, DC, metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 32(3), 403–19. doi:10.1177/107808749703200305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, M. E. (2017). Statutory protection for renters: Classification of state landlord–tenant policy approaches. Housing Policy Debate, 27(1), 98–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, D. P., Hao, L.-X., & Parish, W. L. (1990). Race, kin networks, and assistance to mother-headed families. Social Forces, 68(3), 797–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Spratt, K. (1998). Housing discrimination and source of income: A tenant’s losing battle. Indiana Law Review, 32, 457–480.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2008). Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashup, J., Edin, K., & Karen B. (2005). Participation in a residential mobility program from the client’s perspective: Findings from gautreaux two. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), 361–92.
   Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2000). Why voucher and certificate users live in distressed neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 11(4), 881–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendall, R. (2014). Driving to opportunity: Understanding the links among transportation access, residential outcomes, and economic opportunity for housing voucher recipients. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• PRRAC. (2017). Expanding choice: Practical strategies for building a successful housing mobility program: Appendix B. Poverty and Race Research Action Council. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, E. (2014). Rigging the rules of the game: How landlords geographically sort low-income renters. City & Community, 13(4), 310–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. F. (2015). Housing policy in the United States (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Small, M. L. (2009). `How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegman, M. A. (1972). Housing investment in the inner city: The dynamics of decline; A study of Baltimore, Maryland, 1968–1970. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tegeler, P., Cunningham, M., & Turner, M. A. (2005). Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program. Conference Report of the Third National Conference on Housing Mobility. Washington, DC: Poverty & Race Research Action Council.
   Google Scholar
• Tighe, J. R., Hatch, M. E., & Mead, J. (2017). Source of income discrimination and fair housing policy. Journal of Planning Literature, 32, 3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant‐based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 373–94. doi:10.1080/10511482.1998.9521299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. (1999). Section 8 mobility and neighborhood health: Emerging issues and policy challenges. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., & Ross, S. L. (2005). How racial discrimination affects the search for housing. In X. D. S. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America (pp. 81–100). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Ross, S. L., Galster, G. C., & Yinger, J. (2002). Discrimination in metropolitan housing markets. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Jaroscak, J., & Kleinhans, R. (2017). How to attract more landlords to the Housing Choice Voucher Program: A case study of landlord outreach efforts. Urban Research & Practice, 10(2), 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wogan, J. B. 2017. “Cities have a new target for ending homelessness: landlords.” Governing. http://www.governing.com/topics/health-human-services/gov-boston-dc-landlord-assistance-risk-housing-homeless.html
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, J. (1995). Closed doors, opportunities lost: The continuing costs of housing discrimination. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar