Neighborhood Opportunity and Satisfaction Among Housing Choice Voucher Recipients: A Subjective Well-Being Perspective

References

• Amérigo, M., & Aragones, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragonés, J. I., Amérigo, M., & Pérez-López, R. (2017). Residential satisfaction and quality of life. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology and quality of life research (pp. 311–328). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., & Goel, V. (2001). Introduction to multilevel regression models, An. Can J Public Health, 92(2), 150–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basolo, V. (2013). Examining mobility outcomes in the housing choice voucher program: Neighborhood poverty, employment, and public school quality. Cityscape, 15(2), 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Nguyen, M. T. (2005). Does mobility matter? The neighborhood conditions of housing voucher holders by race and ethnicity. Housing Policy Debate, 16(3–4), 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basolo, V., & Yerena, A. (2017). Residential mobility of low-income, subsidized households: A synthesis of explanatory frameworks. Housing Studies, 32(6), 841–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. L., Edin, K., Clampet-Lundquist, S., & Duncan, G. J. (2010). The durability of gains from the Gautreaux Two residential mobility program: A qualitative analysis of who stays and who moves from low-poverty neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 20(1), 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, X. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 177–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciorici, P., & Dantzler, P. (2019). Neighborhood satisfaction: A study of a low-income urban community. Urban Affairs Review, 55(6), 1702–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clampet‐Lundquist, S. (2004). HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 415–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climaco, C. G., Rodgers, C. N., Feins, J., & Lam, K. (2008). Portability moves in the housing choice voucher program, 1998–2005. Cityscape, 10(1), 5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Cramm, J. M., Van Dijk, H. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2013). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. The Gerontologist, 53(1), 142–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. K., Sylvester, D. J., & Turner, M. A. (2000). Section 8 households in the Washington region: Neighborhood choices and constraints. Washinton, DC: Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. K., Galvez, M. M., Aranda, C., Santos, R., Wissoker, D., Oneto, A. D., … Crawford, J. (2018). A pilot study of landlord acceptance of housing choice vouchers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., Jeon, J. S., & Pendall, R. (2015). Transportation access, rental vouchers, and neighborhood satisfaction: Evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. Housing Policy Debate, 25(3), 497–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, S., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2003). Natural environments—healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35(10), 1717–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmelle, E., Zhou, Y., & Thill, J. C. (2014). Densification without growth management? Evidence from local land development and housing trends in Charlotte, North Carolina, USA. Sustainability, 6(6), 3975–3990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Gray, R. W., Rubin, L., & Taghavi, L. B. (2003). Housing choice voucher location patterns: Implications for participants and neighborhood welfare. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2013). The remarkable changes in the science of subjective well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 663–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24, 25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, H., & Qin, B. (2017). Exploring the link between neighborhood environment and mental wellbeing: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 164, 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eid, M., & Larsen, R. J. (Eds.). (2008). The science of subjective well-being. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, I. G., Horn, K. M., & Schwartz, A. E. (2016). Why don’t housing choice voucher recipients live near better schools? Insights from Big Data. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(4), 884–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D. (2004). Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well‐being? Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (1987). Identifying the correlates of dwelling satisfaction: An empirical critique. Environment and Behavior, 19(5), 539–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C. (2019). Neighborhoods and national housing policy: Toward circumscribed, neighborhood-sensitive reforms. Housing Policy Debate, 29(1), 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential satisfaction: Compositional and contextual correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735–758.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., & Killen, S. P. (1995). The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate, 6(1), 7–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvez, M. M. (2010). What do we know about housing choice voucher program location outcomes. A review of recent literature. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J., Haghighi, A., Stebbins, H., & Siewert, M. (1995). Progress report to Congress: Promoting housing choice in HUD’s rental assistance programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, J. M., Stebbins, H., & Siewert, M. (1996). Promoting housing choice in HUD’s rental assistance programs: A report to Congress. Washington, DC: DIANE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2003). Housing dispersal programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 18(1), 3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G. (2018). The one-way street of integration: Fair housing and the pursuit of racial justice in American cities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010). You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal. Housing Policy Debate, 20(2), 209–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2011). A different lens: Administrative perspectives on portability in Illinois’ housing choice voucher program. Housing Policy Debate, 21(3), 377–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A. J. (2014). More than meets the market? Landlord agency in the Illinois housing choice voucher program. Housing Policy Debate, 24(3), 500–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housing Choice Voucher Fact Sheets. (2017, October 11). Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/housing-choice-voucher-fact-sheets
   Google Scholar
• Imbroscio, D. (2008). United and actuated by some common impulse of passion: Challenging the dispersal consensus in American housing policy research. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30, 111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. D., & Finkel, M. (1996). Section 8 rental voucher and rental certificate utilization study. Washington, DC: DIANE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, W. L., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2017). Neighborhood predictors of life domain satisfaction and subjective wellbeing in rural and urban groups: Implications for health policy and practice. International Journal of Health, Wellness & Society, 7(2). doi:10.18848/2156-8960/CGP/v07i02/83-97
   Google Scholar
• Kleit, R. G., & Galvez, M. (2011). The location choices of public housing residents displaced by redevelopment: Market constraints, personal preferences, or social information? Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(4), 375–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, E. (2017). The cartography of opportunity: Spatial data science for equitable urban policy. Housing Policy Debate, 27(6), 913–940. doi:10.1080/10511482.2017.1331930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C. (2017). Measuring the geography of opportunity. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, M. C., Ellen, I. G., & O’Regan, K. (2011). Do vouchers help low-income households live in safer neighborhoods? Evidence on the housing choice voucher program. Cityscape, 47(3), 135–159.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, E., & Cerin, E. (2008). Are perceptions of the local environment related to neighbourhood satisfaction and mental health in adults? Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., & Stults, B. (2012). The persistence of segregation in the Metropolis: New findings from the 2010 census ( Census Brief prepared for Project US2010, 2011). doi:10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0999-PDN
   Google Scholar
• Lu, M. (1998). Analyzing migration decisionmaking: Relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior. Environment and Planning A, 30(8), 1473–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, J. M. (2005). The policy case for research into regulatory barriers: Reflections on HUD’s research conference on regulatory barriers to affordable housing. Cityscape, 8(1), 233–242.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science, 337(6101), 1505–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(7), 587–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2008). Deconcentrating poverty with housing programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(1), 90–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2010). The prospects for guiding housing choice voucher households to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Cityscape,  12(3), 101–122.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K. (2011). Housing choice voucher marketing opportunity index: Analysis of data at the tract and block group level. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, K., Schwartz, A. F., & Taghavi, L. B. (2015). Housing choice voucher location patterns a decade later. Housing Policy Debate, 25(2), 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osypuk, T. L., & Acevedo-Garcia, D. (2010). Beyond individual neighborhoods: A geography of opportunity perspective for understanding racial/ethnic health disparities. Health & Place, 16(6), 1113–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., & Cunningham, M. K. (2000). Searching for Section 8 housing in Chicago. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rohe, W. M., Webb, M. D., & Jaramillo, A. (2019). Transforming housing assistance: Fourth Biennial moving forward assessment. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, J. E., & DeLuca, S. (2000). Is housing mobility the key to welfare reform. Lessons from Chicago’s Gautreaux project. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, P., & DeLuca, S. (2012). ‘We Don’t Live Outside, We Live in Here’: Neighborhood and residential mobility decisions among low‐income households. City & Community, 11(3), 254–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, L. M., Levitt, R. L., & Sackett, C. (2016). Breaking down barriers: Housing, neighborhoods, and schools of opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Sard, B., & Rice, D. (2016). Realizing the housing voucher program’s potential to enable households to move to better neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
   Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighborhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59(1), 79–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R., Naparstek, A., Popkin, S., Bartlett, L., Bates, L., Cigna, J., … Vinson, E. (2002). Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Tegeler, P., Cunningham, M., & Turner, M. A. (2005). Keeping the promise: Preserving and enhancing housing mobility in the Section 8 housing choice voucher program. Washington, DC: Poverty and Race Research Action Council.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A. (1998). Moving out of poverty: Expanding mobility and choice through tenant‐based housing assistance. Housing Policy Debate, 9(2), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., Comey, J., Kuehn, D., & Nichols, A. (2011). Helping poor households gain and sustain access to high-opportunity neighborhoods. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. A., & Ross, S. L. (2005). How racial discrimination affects the search for housing. In  X. Briggs (Ed.), The geography of opportunity: Race and housing choice in metropolitan America (pp. 81–100). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2001). Housing choice voucher program guidebook. Washington, DC: Office of Housing Choice Vouchers.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2017). Affirmatively furthering fair housing data and mapping tool data documentation. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development  and Research.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2019). Resident characteristics report.
   Google Scholar
• Varady, D. (2010). What should housing vouchers do? A review of the recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 25(4), 391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varady, D. P., Walker, C. C., & Wang, X. (2001). Voucher recipient achievement of improved housing conditions in the US: Do moving distance and relocation services matter? Urban Studies, 38(8), 1273–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Li, W. (2007). Entrepreneurship, ethnicity and local contexts: Hispanic entrepreneurs in three US southern metropolitan areas. GeoJournal, 68(2–3), 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R. (2018). Tracking ‘Choice’ in the housing choice voucher program: The relationship between neighborhood preference and locational outcome. Urban Affairs Review, 54(2), 302–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, M. D., Frescoln, K. P., & Rohe, W. M. (2015). Innovation in public housing: The moving to work demonstration. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Urban and Regional Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2008). A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), 307–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2017). Perceived residential environment of neighborhood and subjective well-being among the elderly in China: A mediating role of sense of community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 51, 82–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar