Did HOPE VI Move Communities to Opportunity? How Public Housing Redevelopment Affected Neighborhood Poverty, Racial Composition, and Resources 1990–2016

References

• Aratani, Y., Lazzeroni, S., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Hernández, D. (2019). Housing subsidies and early childhood development: A comprehensive review of policies and demonstration projects. Housing Policy Debate, 29(2), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2018.1515099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arel-Bundock, V. (2021). Staggered difference-in-differences with two-way fixed effects and interactions. Retrieved from https://arelbundock.com/posts/2021-09-30-extendedtwfe/
   Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter, O. (1978). Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. K., & Helmuth, A. S. (n.d.). National ZIP code crosswalk, 1990–2010, beta test version 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, E., & Fitzgerald, J. M. (2005). Hedonic estimation and policy significance of the impact of HOPE VI on neighborhood property values. Review of Policy Research, 22(6), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2005.00175.x
   Google Scholar
• Baird, M. D., Schwartz, H., Hunter, G. P., Gary-Webb, T. L., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., Dubowitz, T., & Troxel, W. M. (2020). Does large-scale neighborhood reinvestment work? Effects of public–private real estate investment on local sales prices, rental prices, and crime rates. Housing Policy Debate, 30(2), 164–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2019.1655468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. D. (2009). The evolution of HOPE VI as a development program. In H. G. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 31–47). Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulger, M., Joseph, M., McKinney, S., & Bilimoria, D. (2021). Social inclusion through mixed-income development: Design and practice in the Choice Neighborhoods Initiative. Journal of Urban Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2021.1898283
   Google Scholar
• Cassola, A. (2020). Promoting mixed-income communities by mitigating displacement: Findings from 80 large U.S. cities. In M. L. Joseph & A. T. Khare (Eds.), What works to promote inclusive, equitable, mixed-income communities. San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. https://case.edu/socialwork/nimc/resources/what-works-volume/essays/policy-innovations#Mitigating
   Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J., & Joseph, M. L. (2010). Building “community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45(3), 299–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409341544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloud, W., & Roll, S. (2011). Denver Housing Authority's Park Avenue HOPE VI revitalization project: Community impact results. Housing Policy Debate, 21(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2011.567288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulton, C. J., Jennings, M. Z., & Chan, T. (2013). How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, A. M. (2010). HOPE VI–A viable strategy for improving neighborhood conditions and resident self-sufficiency? The case of Maverick Gardens in Boston. Housing Policy Debate, 20(2), 237–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511481003738542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., & Freeman, L. (2011). Planning for evaluation: Using regression discontinuity to evaluate targeted place-based programs. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11412784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmann, E., Giebler, A., & Weyh, A. (2020). Flexpaneldid: A Stata toolbox for causal analysis with varying treatment time and duration. IWH Discussion Papers, 3. Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle. Retrieved March 28, 2021, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-118740
   Google Scholar
• Din, A., & Wilson, R. (2020). Crosswalking ZIP codes to census geographies: Geoprocessing the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development’s ZIP Code Crosswalk Files. Cityscape, 22, 293–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do, D. P. (2009). The dynamics of income and neighborhood context for population health: Do long-term measures of socioeconomic status explain more of the black/white health disparity than single-point-in-time measures? Social Science & Medicine, 68(8), 1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulin-Keita, A., Hannon, L., Buys, D., Casazza, K., & Clay, O. (2016). Surrounding community residents’ expectations of HOPE VI for their community, health and physical activity. Journal of Community Practice, 84(1), 18–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galster, G. (2007). Should policy makers strive for neighborhood social mix? An analysis of the Western European evidence base. Housing Studies, 22(4), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701387630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Galseter, J., & Vachuska, K. (2022). Dam white property: Quantifying the disparate racial impacts of dam removals. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. C., Hayes, C., & Johnson, J. (2005). Identifying robust, parsimonious neighborhood indicators. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04267717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G., Temkin, K., Walker, C., & Sawyer, N. (2004). Measuring the impacts of community development initiatives: A new application of the adjusted interrupted time-series method. Evaluation Review, 28(6), 502–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04267090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. G., & Chapple, K. (2010). You gotta move: Advancing the debate on the record of dispersal. Housing Policy Debate, 20(2), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511481003779876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, E. (2011). Gentrification in black and white: The racial impact of public housing demolition in American cities. Urban Studies, 48(8), 1581–1604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010375323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (2003). Public housing: HOPE VI resident issues and changes in neighborhoods surrounding grant sites. Report number: GAO-04-109. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-04-109
   Google Scholar
• Graves, E. M. (2011). Mixed outcome developments: Comparing policy goals to resident outcomes in mixed-income housing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.567921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gress, T. H., Cho, S., & Joseph, M. L. (2016). HOPE VI data compilation and analysis. National Initiative on Mixed-Income Communities; Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Gress, T. H., Joseph, M. L., & Cho, S. (2019). What did two decades of HOPE VI mixed-income redevelopment produce? Confirmations, new insights and future implications. Cityscape, 21, 185–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubesic, T. H., & Matisziw, T. C. (2006). On the use of ZIP codes and ZIP code tabulation areas (ZCTAs) for the spatial analysis of epidemiological data. International Journal of Health Geographics, 5(1), 15–58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-5-58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J. A., & Todd, P. E. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098. https://doi.org/10.2307/2999630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., LaLonde, R. J., & Smith, J. A. (1999). The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. E. Card (Eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics (3rd ed., pp. 1865–2097). Elsevier Science B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, J. D., Liese, A. D., Lawson, A., Porter, D. E., Puett, R. C., Standiford, D., Liu, L., & Dabelea, D. (2009). Evaluating geographic imputation approaches for zip code level data: An application to a study of pediatric diabetes. International Journal of Health Geographics, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-8-54
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holin, M. J., Buron, L., Locke, G., & Cortes, A. (2003). Interim assessment of the HOPE VI program cross-site report. Prepared by Abt Associates, Inc. for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (2021). Public housing. Retrieved December 15, 2021, from https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (1996). Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for public housing demolition, site revitalization, and replacement housing grants (HOPE VI); Fiscal year 1996 (Docket No. FR-4076-N-01). https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/DOC_10000.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, M. L., Chaskin, R. J., & Webber, H. S. (2007). The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review, 42(3), 369–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087406294043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B. (2009). The origins of HOPE VI. In H. G. Cisneros & L. Engdahl (Eds.), From despair to hope: HOPE VI and the new promise of public housing in America’s cities (pp. 15–29). Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keene, D. E., & Geronimus, A. T. (2011). “Weathering” HOPE VI: The importance of evaluating the population health impact of public housing demolition and displacement. Journal of Urban Health, 88(3), 417–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D. K., & Gallagher, M. (2006). HOPE VI and neighborhood revitalization: A report to the MacArthur Foundation. The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, J. R., Stults, B. J., & Xu, Z. (2016). Validating population estimates for harmonized Census Tract data, 2000–2010. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(5), 1013–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1187060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012). Neighborhood effects on the long-term well-being of low-income adults. Science, 337(6101), 1505–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, M. (2012). HOPE VI public housing revitalization program: Background, funding, and issues. Congressional Research Service. Report # RL32236. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=RL32236
   Google Scholar
• Meares, W. L., & Riggs, W. (2016). Walkability and the benefits of place-based housing: An examination of Louisville’s HOPE VI neighborhoods. Housing and Society, 43(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2017.1293428
   Google Scholar
• National Housing Law Project, Poverty and Race Research Action Council, Sherwood Research Associations, & Everywhere and Now Public Housing Residents Organizing Nationally Together (2002). False HOPE: A critical assessment of the HOPE VI public housing redevelopment program. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from https://www.nhlp.org/files/FalseHOPE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Initiative on Mixed-Income Communities (2021). NIMC mixed income database. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from https://case.edu/socialwork/nimc/database
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. T., Rohe, W., Frescoln, K., Webb, M., Donegan, M., & Han, H. (2016). Mobilizing social capital: Which informal and formal supports affect employment outcomes for HOPE VI residents? Housing Studies, 31(7), 785–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1140724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, D., Fraser, J., & Bazuin, J. (2015). The imagined self-sufficient communities of HOPE VI: Examining the community and social support component. Urban Affairs Review, 51(5), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414544461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., Harris, L. E., Comey, J., Cunningham, M. K., & Buron, L. F. (2004). The HOPE VI program: What about the residents? Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 385–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2004.9521506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, S. J., Levy, D. K., & Buron, L. (2009). Has HOPE VI transformed residents’ lives? New evidence from the HOPE VI panel study. Housing Studies, 24(4), 477–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030902938371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. S., & Hagemans, I. W. (2015). “Gentrification without displacement” and the consequent loss of place: The effects of class transition on low-income residents of secure housing in gentrifying areas. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, H. (2013). Commentary: Mixing policies: Expectations and achievements. Cityscape, 15(2), 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Shmool, J. L. C., Yonas, M. A., Newman, O. D., Kubzansky, L. D., Joseph, E., Parks, A., Callaway, C., Chubb, L. G., Shepard, P., & Clougherty, J. E. (2015). Identifying perceived neighborhood stressors across diverse communities in New York City. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(1–2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9736-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp (2017). Stata 15 base reference manual. Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tach, L., & Emory, A. D. (2017). Public housing redevelopment, neighborhood change, and the restructuring of urban inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 123(3), 686–739. https://doi.org/10.1086/695468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turbov, M., & Piper, V. (2005). HOPE VI and mixed-finance redevelopments: A catalyst for neighborhood renewal. Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Vale, L. J., & Shamsuddin, S. (2017). All mixed up: Making sense of mixed-income housing developments. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1248475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2021). ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTA). United States Census Bureau. Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/geo-areas/zctas.html.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (n.d.). About HOPE VI. https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/ph/hope6/about.
   Google Scholar
• Weden, M. M., Peterson, C. E., Miles, J. N., & Shih, R. A. (2015). Evaluating linearly interpolated intercensal estimates of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of U.S. counties and census tracts 2001–2009. Population Research and Policy Review, 34(4), 541–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R., & Din, A. (2018). Understanding and enhancing the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s ZIP Code Crosswalk Files. Cityscape, 20, 277–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S. (2003). Assessing economic change in HOPE VI neighborhoods. Housing Policy Debate, 14(4), 621–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2003.9521489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S., & Voith, R. (2010). HOPE VI and neighborhood economic development: The importance of local market dynamics. Cityscape, 12, 99–131.
   Google Scholar
• Zielenbach, S., Voith, R., & Mariano, M. (2010). Estimating the local economic impacts of HOPE VI. Housing Policy Debate, 20(3), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511481003788794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar