The Eighth Characteristic for Successful Calculus Programs: Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Practices

REFERENCES

• Adiredja, A. P. and M. Zandieh. 2017. Using intuitive examples from women of color to reveal nuances about basis. In Weinberg, A., Rasmussen, C., Rabin, J., Wawro, M., and Brown. S. (Eds), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 346–359.
   Google Scholar
• Apkarian, N., D. Kirin, J. Gehrtz, and K. Vroom. in press. Connecting the stakeholders: Departments, policy, and research in undergraduate mathematics education. PRIMUS.
   Google Scholar
• Asera, R. 2001. Calculus and Community: A History of the Emerging Scholars Program. A Report of the National Task Force on Minority High Achievement. New York: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, V. and E. Lopez. 2015. And still I see no changes: Enduring views of students of color in science and mathematics education policy reports. Science Education. 99(3): 519–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battey, D. and L. A. Leyva. 2018. Making the implicit explicit: Building a case for implicit racial attitudes to inform mathematics education research. In Toward Equity and Social Justice in Mathematics Education, pp. 21–41. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, V. and E. Walker. 2012. What makes the difference? Black women's undergraduate and graduate experiences in mathematics. The Journal of Negro Education. 81(4): 366–378.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. and C. Rasmussen. 2015. Seven characteristics of successful calculus programs. Notices of the AMS, 62(2): 144–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. and C. Rasmussen. 2019, January. Setting the record straight [Letter to the Editor]. Notices of the AMS. 66(1): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. M., M. P. Carlson, V. Mesa, and C. Rasmussen. 2013. The calculus student: Insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 44(5): 685–698.
   Google Scholar
• Burn, H. E., V. Mesa, J. L. Wood, and E. Zamani-Gallaher. 2018. National Survey of Community College Mathematics Chairs: Technical Report and Summary. Transitioning learners to calculus in community colleges. Office of Community College Research and Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill, G. 2017. Challenges in the transition from high school to post secondary mathematics. The Role of Calculus in the Transition from High School to College Mathematics, 67.
   Google Scholar
• Champion, J. and V. Mesa. 2016. Factors affecting calculus completion among US high school students. In The Role of Calculus in the Transition from High School to College Mathematics. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. 1982. Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology. 8(1): 209–235.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G. 1994. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research. 64(1): 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSU East Bay, (n.d). Operational definitions for diversity, equity and inclusion and cultural competence. http://www.csueastbay.edu/about/diversity/files/docs/pdfs/operational-def-diversity-equity-inclusion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., K. Hanson, G. Nuñez, and C. Rasmussen. 2015. Beyond plug and chug: An analysis of calculus I homework. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. 1(2): 268–287.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., B. K. Fosdick, and C. Rasmussen. 2016. Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PloS One. 11(7): e0157447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. 2001. 18 Critical mathematics education. Issues in Mathematics Teaching. 277.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, L. 2011. Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review. 81(2): 209–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felix, E. R., E. M. Bensimon, D. Hanson, J. Gray, and L. Klingsmith. 2015. Developing agency for equity-minded change. New Directions for Community Colleges. 2015(172): 25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(23): 8410–8415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, C., A. Rattan, and C. S. Dweck. 2012. Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women's representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 102(4): 700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. 2013. The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 41: 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. 2017. Political conocimiento for teaching mathematics. Building Support for Scholarly Practices in Mathematics Methods. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Gutstein, E. 2009. The politics of mathematics education in the US: Dominant and counter agendas. In B. Greer, S. Mukhopadyay, A. Powell, and S. Nelson-Barber (Eds), Culturally Responsive Mathematics Education, pp. 137–164. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R. 2010. An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research. 148(148): 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Harron, P. 2017, February 22. Hands off my confidence [Blog post]. https://blogs.ams.org/inclusionexclusion/2017/02/22/hands-off-my-confidence/
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, F. A. and S. Hurtado. 2011. Maintaining initial interests: Developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career aspirations among underrepresented racial minority students. Presented at The Association for Educational Research Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, E., T. J. Murphy, and U. Treisman. 2008. Supporting high achievement in introductory mathematics courses: What we have learned from 30 years of the Emerging Scholars Program. In M. Carlson, & C. Rasmussen (Eds), Making the Connection: Research and Practice in Undergraduate Mathematics, pp. 205–220. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. R. 2012. Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development. 53(2): 336–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., C. Andrews-Larson, K. Keene, R. Keller, N. Fortune, and K. Melhuish. 2018. Inquiry and inequity in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, and A. M. Tyminski (Eds), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, pp. 966–969.
   Google Scholar
• Klopfenstein, K. 2004. Advanced placement: Do minorities have equal opportunity? Economics of Education Review. 23(2): 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladson-Billings, G. 2012. Through a glass darkly: The persistence of race in education research & scholarship. Educational Researcher. 41(4): 115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., M. L. Hassi, M. Kogan, and T. J. Weston. 2014. Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 45(4): 406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva, L. A. 2016. An intersectional analysis of Latin@ college women’s counter-stories in mathematics. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education. 9(2).
   Google Scholar
• Leyva, L. A. 2017. Unpacking the male superiority myth and masculinization of mathematics at the intersections: A review of research on gender in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 48(4): 397–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. B. 2003. Hidden assumptions and unaddressed questions in mathematics for all rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator. 13(2).
   Google Scholar
• Mathematical Association of America. 2018. Guide to Evidence-Based Instructional Practices in Undergraduate Mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, E. O. 2016. Devalued black and latino racial identities: A by-product of STEM college culture? American Educational Research Journal. 53(6): 1626–1662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, E. O. and D. B. Martin. 2011. “You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value!” Stereotype management among academically successful black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal. 48(6): 1347–1389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendick, H. 2005. A beautiful myth? The gendering of being/doing ‘good at maths’. Gender and Education. 17(2): 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. 2005. Undergraduate mathematics achievement in the emerging ethnic engineers programme. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 36(5): 529–537.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. 2017. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017. Special Report NSF 17-310. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation Available at www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
   Google Scholar
• Ngo, F. and W. W. Kwon. 2015. Using multiple measures to make math placement decisions: Implications for access and success in community colleges. Research in Higher Education. 56(5): 442–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., M. R. Banaji, and A. G. Greenwald. 2002. Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 6(1): 101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, R. T., D. C. Maramba, and T. E. Dancy. 2011. A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. The Journal of Negro Education. 491–504.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., N. Apkarian, J, Hagman, E. Johnson, S. Larsen, and D. Bressoud. 2019. Characteristics of precalculus through calculus 2 programs: Insights From a national census survey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 50(1): 98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., J. Ellis, and D. Zazkis. 2014. Lessons learned from case studies of successful calculus programs at five doctoral degree granting institutions. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, pp. 999–1005.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., J. Ellis, D. Zazkis, and D. Bressoud. 2014. Features of successful calculus programs at five doctoral degree granting institutions. In S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, & D. Allan (Eds), Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 5, pp. 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. and O. N. Kwon. 2007. An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 26(3): 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rodd, M. and H. Bartholomew. 2006. Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education. 18(1): 35–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Y. 2007. Not belonging? What makes a functional learner identity in undergraduate mathematics? Studies in Higher Education. 32(1): 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solorzano, D. G. 1998. Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 11(1): 121–136.
   Google Scholar
• Solorzano, D. G. and A. Ornelas. 2004. A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in public high schools. The High School Journal. 87(3): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, D. W. 2010. Microagressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, G., H. El Turkey, E. Cilli-Turner, M. Savic, G. Karakok, and D. Plaxco. 2017. Inquiry as an entry point to equity in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 48(sup1), S4–S15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W., C. Byerley, and N. Hatfield. 2013. A conceptual approach to calculus made possible by technology. Computers in the Schools. 30(1-2): 124–147.
   Google Scholar
• Tinto, V. 1975. Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research. 45(1): 89–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. 2016. Table 311.40. Percentage of first-year undergraduate students who reported taking remedial education courses, by selected student and institution characteristics: 2003–04, 2007–08, and 2011–12. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_311.40.asp?current=yes
   Google Scholar
• Voigt, M., N. Apkarian, and C. Rasmussen. 2017. Diverging from the standard fare: Variations in the calculus curriculum. MAA FOCUS. 37(1): 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. (n.d.). Learning styles FAQ [Blog post]. http://www.danielwillingham.com/learning-styles-faq.html
   Google Scholar
• Witham, K., L. E. Malcom-Piqueux, A. C. Dowd, and E. M. Bensimon. 2015. America's Unmet Promise: The Imperative for Equity in Higher Education. Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar