Everyday Activism: Gender-Based Service in Stem

References

• Baez, B. 2000. Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education. 39(3): 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003972214943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, R. T. and J. H. Lawrence. 1995. Faculty at Work: Motivation, Expectation, Satisfaction. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, C. 2007. ‘I'm not an activist, though I've done a lot of it’: Doing activism, being activist and the ‘perfect standard’ in a contemporary movement. Social Movement Studies. 6(2): 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830701497277.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, I. and S. Shattuck. (Directors). 2020. Picture a scientist [Film]. Ro*co Films Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. 1995. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity, politics, and violence against women of color. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, and G. Peller (Eds), Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, pp. 357–383. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crimmins, G. 2019. Strategies for Resisting Sexism in the Academy: Higher Education, Gender and Intersectionality. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04852-5.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, B. T. and M. H. Kohlman. 2012. Intersectionality: A transformative paradigm in feminist theory and social justice. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, pp. 154–174. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740.n8.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, H. 1996. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmer, P. J. and K. M. Borman. 2014. Deciding to collaborate and selecting our STEM project. In P. J. Gilmer, B. Tansel, and M. H. Miller (Eds), Alliances for Advancing Academic Women: Guidelines for Collaborating in STEM Fields, pp. 3–32. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-604-2_1.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. A., J. C. Bennett, and J. Harris. 2013. Marginalizing merit?: Gender differences in Black faculty D/discourses on tenure, advancement, and professional success. The Review of Higher Education. 36(4): 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2013.0040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. A., M. J. Pifer, J. R. Humphrey, and A. M. Hazelwood. 2011. Re) defining departure: Exploring Black professors' experiences with and responses to racism and racial climate. American Journal of Education. 117(4): 495–526. https://doi.org/10.1086/660756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, K. A. and R. J. Reddick. 2011. Surveillance and sacrifice: Gender differences in the mentoring patterns of Black professors at predominantly White research universities. American Educational Research Journal. 48(5): 1032–1057. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211405025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., C. Corbett, and A. S. Rose. 2010. Why so few? American Association for University Women. https://www.aauw.org/research/why-so-few/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. 2011. Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology. 37(1): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauchen, J. G. in press. Institutional activism in diversity, equity, and inclusion faculty service in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022036614.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, M. F., T. M. Laverty, S. P. Bombaci, K. Wilkins, D. E. Bennett, and L. Pejchar. 2019. Underrepresented faculty play a disproportionate role in advancing diversity and inclusion. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 3(7): 1030–1033. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0911-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. J., J. Brown, H. Carlone, and A. K. Cuevas. 2011. Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48(4): 339–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanny, M. A., L. J. Sax, and T. A. Riggers-Pieh. 2014. Investigating forty years of STEM research: How explanations for the gender gap have evolved over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 20(2): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007246.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, M. F. 1998. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest Inside the Church and Military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. and J. Lester. (2011, July). Enhancing Campus Capacity for Leadership: An Examination of Grassroots Leaders in Higher Education. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804776479.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Machen, R., W. Austin, and M. K. Voigt. 2021. Responding to microaggressions in the classroom: Perspectives From introductory mathematics instructors. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Proceedings. https://peer.asee.org.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520891.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. 2001. Tempered Radicals. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Mouzelis, N. P. 1991. Back to Sociological Theory: The Construction of Social Orders. New York, NY: St Martin's Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21760-1.
   Google Scholar
• O'Meara, K. 2011. Inside the panopticon: Studying academic reward systems. In M. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 161–220. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, M., C. Wright, L. L. Espinose, and G. Orfield. 2011. Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review. 81(2): 172–208. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.2.t022245n7x4752v2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla, A. M. 1994. Research news and Comment: Ethnic minority scholars; research, and mentoring: Current and future issues. Educational Researcher. 23(4): 24–27. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023004024.
   Google Scholar
• Pettinicchio, D. 2012. Institutional activism: Reconsidering the insider/outsider dichotomy. Sociology Compass. 6(6): 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00465.x.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, H., P. Monin, and R. Durand. 2003. Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in french gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology. 108(4): 795–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/367917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley, D. 2008. Engineering and Social Justice, Vol. 7. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00117ED1V01Y200805ETS007.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, B. 2006. Gender inequality and feminist activism in institutions: Challenges of marginalization and feminist ‘fading’. In L. Chappell and L. Hill (Eds), The Politics of Women'S Interests: New Comparative Perspectives, pp. 157–174. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. 1997. Questioning Empowerment: Working with Women in Honduras. Rugby, UK: Oxfam. https://doi.org/10.3362/9780855988364.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, L. P., F. Castro-Villarreal, and E. Sosa. 2013. Testimonios of Latina junior faculty: Bridging academia, family, and community lives in the academy. Educational Foundations. 27(1–2): 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Peña, M., J. Main, N. Sambamurthy, M. Cox, and E. McGee. 2016. The factors affecting the persistence of Latina faculty: A literature review using the intersectionality of race, gender, and class. In 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9).https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2016.7757519.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A. S. and S. W. Thomas. 2014. Learning through collaboration. In P. J. Gilmer, B. Tansel, and M. H. Miller (Eds), Alliances for Advancing Academic Women: Guidelines for Collaborating in STEM Fields, pp. 193–204. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-604-2_9.
   Google Scholar
• Stones, R. 2005. Structuration Theory. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21364-7.
   Google Scholar
• Urrieta, L. and L. Méndez Benavídez. 2007. Community commitment and activist scholarship. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education. 6(3): 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192707302535.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. T. and J. L. Degol. 2016. Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implication for practice, policy and future directions. Educational Psychology Review. 29(1): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C., K. W. Phillips, and E. V. Hall. 2016. Tools for change: Boosting the retention of women in the STEM pipeline. Journal of Research in Gender Studies. 6(1): 11–75. https://doi.org/10.22381/jrgs6120161.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, K. 2007. Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. New York, NY: Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar