https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-4261
REFERENCES
- Carlson, M., M. Oehrtman, and N. Engelke. 2010. The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction. 28(2): 113–145.
- Glassmeyer, D., A. Brakoniecki, and J. Amador. 2019. Promoting uncertainty to support preservice teachers’ reasoning about the tangent relationship. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 50(4): 527–556.
- Kaput, J. 1992. Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, pp. 515–556. New York: Macmillan.
- Madison, B., M. Carlson, M. Oehrtman, and M. Tallman. 2015. Conceptual precalculus: strengthening students’ quantitative and covariational reasoning. The Mathematics Teacher. 109(1): 54–61.
- Smith, M. and M. Stein. 1998. Reflections on practice: Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School. 3(5): 344–350.
- Trocki, A. and K. Hollebrands. 2018. The development of a framework for assessing dynamic geometry task quality. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. 4(2–3): 110–138.
- Zengin, Y. 2021. Students’ understanding of parametric equations in a collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1–27. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080%2F0020739X.2021.1966848&area=0000000000000001