Revisiting Past Assignments: Do Precalculus Students Learn More from Revising or Discussing Their Work?

REFERENCES

• Beidleman, J., D. Jones, and P. Well. 1995. Increasing students' conceptual understanding of mathematics through writing. PRIMUS. 5(4): 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, T. A., A. L. Cohen, and W. Buskist. 2005. Rapport: Its relation to student attitudes and behaviors toward teachers and classes. Teaching of Psychology. 32(4): 237–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birken, M. 1989. Using writing to assist learning in college mathematics classes. In P. Connolly and T. Vilardi (Eds), Writing to Learn Mathematics and Science. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. 2013. Ability and mathematics: The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. FORUM. 55(1): 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, D. L. and A. Lax. 1994. Trying everything in a precalculus course. PRIMUS. 4(2): 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Buskist, W. and B. K. Saville. 2004. Rapport building: Creating positive emotional contexts for enhancing teaching and learning. In B. Perlman, L. I. McCann, and S. H. McFadden (Eds), Lessons Learned: Practical Advice for the Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 149–155. Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., D. Clark, and J. OShaughnessy. 2020. Introduction to the special issue on implementing mastery grading in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. PRIMUS. 30(8–10): 837–848.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle, S. 2020. Simple specifications grading. PRIMUS. 30(8–10): 926–951.
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W. and Z. F. Gamson. 1987. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin. 39(7): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cilli-Turner, E., J. Dunmyre, T. Mahoney, and C. Wiley. 2020. Mastery grading: Build-A-Syllabus workshop. PRIMUS. 30(8–10): 952–978.
   Google Scholar
• Cotten, S. and B. Wilson. 2006. Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education. 51(4): 487–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crannell, A., G. LaRose, T. Ratliff, and E. Rykken 2004. Writing Projects for Mathematics Courses: Crushed Clowns, Cars, and Coffee to Go. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 2006. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, B. 2021. On the use of writing prompts in entry-level mathematics courses. PRIMUS. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2021.1871988.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garner, B. and N. Shank. 2018. Student perceptions of a revise and resubmit policy for writing assignments. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 81(3): 351–367.
   Google Scholar
• Halawah, I. 2006. The impact of student-faculty informal interpersonal relationships on intellectual and personal development. College Student Journal. 40(3): 670–678.
   Google Scholar
• Holdener, J. A. and B. D. Jones. 2019. Calculus homework: A storied approach. PRIMUS. 29(1): 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. and J. Pitts. 2009. Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student-faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education. 20: 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, A. L. 2014. Just checking in: The effect of an office hour meeting and learning reflection in an introductory statistics course. Teaching of Psychology. 41(1): 83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery, M. and R. Stuffelbeam. 2014. Editorial for special issue on writing and editing in the mathematics curriculum: part I. PRIMUS. 24(6): 443–446.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. and S. Jones. 2007. More than just error correction: Students' perspectives on their revision processes during writing. Written Communication. 24: 323–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilson, L. 2015. Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, P. V. 2020. Using revision and specifications grading to develop students' mathematical habits of mind. PRIMUS. 30(8-10): 908–925.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. J. 1989. Learning mathematics through writing: Some guidelines. The College Mathematics Journal. 20(5): 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Ray Parsons, M. 2011. Effects of writing to learn in precalculus mathematics on achievement and affective outcomes for students in a community college setting: A mixed methods approach. Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado State University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 3454629.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, K. L. 2015. There's no limit: Mathematics teaching for a growth mindset. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. 2015. Putting specs grading to work. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/blognetwork/castingoutnines/2015/01/19/putting-specs-grading-to-work/. Accessed 1 November 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Tennant, A. 2012. Adult student learning behaviors in a roadblock mathematics course. Doctoral Dissertation, Texas State University -- San Marcos. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 3537493.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoi, M. Y., M. E. Anzovino, A. H. Lin Erickson, E. R. Forringer, E. Henary, A. Lively, M. S. Morton, K. Perell-Gerson, S. Perrine, O. Villanueva, and M. Whitney. 2019. Variations in implementation of specifications grading in stem courses. Georgia Journal of Science. 77(2): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. L., J. R. Hayes, J. A. Hatch, W. Miller, G. Moser, and C. M. Silk. 1996. Better revision in eight minutes? Prompting first-year college writers to revise globally. Journal of Educational Psychology. 88: 682–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weld, C. 2014. Listen to this! utilizing audio recordings to improve instructor feedback on writing in mathematics. PRIMUS. 24(6): 513–528.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. H. and R. G. Ryan. 2013. Professor-student rapport scale: Six items predict student outcomes. Teaching of Psychology. 40: 130–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmes, M., A. Boye, and S. Tapp. 2019. Transparent Design in Higher Education Teaching and Leadership: A Guide to Implementing the Transparency Framework Institution-Wide to Improve Learning and Retention. First Edition. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar