Development and application of an optimized drop-slide technique for metaphase chromosome spreads in maize

References

• Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2013. Image processing with image. Biophot Internat. 11: 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Albani D, Cote MJ, Amstrong KC, Chen Q, Segal A, Robert LS. 1993. PCR amplification of microdissected wheat chromosome arms in a simple “single tube” reaction. Plant J. 4: 899–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andras SC, Hartman TPV, Marshall JA, Marchant R, Power JB, Cocking EC, Davey MR. 1999. A drop-spreading technique to produce cytoplasm-free mitotic preparations from plants with small chromosomes. Chrom Res. 7: 641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FB, Yao QL, Huo SP, Liu HF. 2017. Evolution of maize landraces in southwestern china: evidence from B chromosomes. Int J Agric Biol. 19: 453–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YM, Lin BY. 2003. Cloning and characterization of maize B chromosome sequences derived from microdissection. Genetics. 164: 299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claussen U, Michel S, Mühlig P, Westermann M, Grummt UW, Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Liehr T. 2003. Demystifying chromosome preparation and the implications for the concept of chromosome condensation during mitosis. Cytogen Genome Res. 98: 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carvalho CR, Saraiva LS. 1993. An air drying technique for maize chromosomes without enzymatic maceration. Biotech Histochem. 68: 142–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng W, Tsao SW, Lucas JN, Leung CS, Cheung ALM. 2002. A new method for improving metaphase chromosome spreading. Cytometry. 51A: 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Drpic D, Almeida AC, Aguiar P, Renda F, Damas J, Lewin HA, Larkin DM, Khodjakov A, Maiato H. 2018. Chromosome segregation is biased by kinetochore size. Curr Biol. 28: 1344–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui K, Iijima K. 1991. Somatic chromosome map of rice by imaging methods. Theoret Appl Genet. 81: 589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfmann RA, Stelly DM, Young DH. 2007. Towards improved cell cycle synchronization and chromosome preparation methods in cotton. J Cotton Sci. 11: 667–678.
   Google Scholar
• Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Wright LL, Bray-Ward P, Ward DC, Vance GH. 2001a. Improvements in cytogenic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Cytometry. 43, 101–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henegariu O, Heerema NA, Wright LL, Bray-Ward P, Ward DC, Vance GH. 2001b. Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Biotech Histochem. 74: 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• Hliscs R, Mühlig P, Claussen U. 1997. The spreading of metaphases is a slow process which leads to a stretching of chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 76: 167–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jewell DC, Islam-Faridi N. 1994. A technique for somatic chromosome preparation and c-banding of maize. The maize handbook. Springer, New York. pp: 484–493.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Gill BS. 2006. Current status and the future of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in plant genome research. Genome. 49: 1057–1068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung C, Claussen U, Horsthemke B, Fischer F, Herrmann R G. 1992. A DNA library from an individual Beta patellaris chromosome conferring nematode resistance obtained by microdissection of meiotic metaphase chromosomes. Plant Mol Biol, 20: 503–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato A. 1999. Air drying method using nitrous oxide for chromosome counting in maize. Biotech Histochem. 74: 160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato A, Lamb JC, Albert PS, Danilova T, Han F, Gao Z, Findley S, Birchler JA. 2010. Chromosome painting for plant biotechnology. Plant Chrom Eng. 701: 67–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kato A, Lamb JC, Birchler JA. 2004. Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101: 13554–13559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato A, Vega JM, Han F, Lamb JC, Birchler JA. 2005. Advances in plant chromosome identification and cytogenetic techniques. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 8: 148–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirov I, Divashuk M, Van LK, Soloviev A, Khrustaleva L. 2014. An easy “Steamdrop” method for high quality plant chromosome preparation. Mol Cytogenet. 7(1): 21.doi:10.1186/1755-8166-7-21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kosyakova N, Hamid AB. Chaveerach A, Pinthong K, Siripiyasing P, Supiwong W, Romanenko S, Trifonov V, Fan X. 2013. Generation of multicolor banding probes for chromosomes of different species. Mol Cytogenet, 6 (1):6. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo YT, Hsu HL, Yeh CH, Chang SB. 2016. Application of a modified drop method for high-resolution pachytene chromosome spreads in two Phalaenopsis species. Mol Cytogenet, 9(1). doi:10.1186/s13039-016-0254-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou Q, He Y, Cheng C, Zhang Z, Li J, Huang S, Chen J. 2013. Integration of high-resolution physical and genetic map reveals differential recombination frequency between chromosomes and the genome assembling quality in cucumber. PLoS One. 8(5):e62676. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiato H, Gomes A M, Sousa F, Barisic M. 2017. Mechanisms of chromosome congression during mitosis. Biology. 6(4), 13.doi:10.3390/biology6010013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masonbrink RE, Birchier JA. 2010. Sporophytic nondisjunction of the maize B chromosome at high copy numbers. J Genet Genom. 37: 79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFee AF, Sayer AM, Salomaa SI, Lindholm C, Littlefield LG. 1997. Methods for improving the yield and quality of metaphase preparations for FISH probing of human lymphocyte chromosomes. Env Mol Mutagen. 29: 98–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming DX. 2006. Advanced biostatistics. Agricultural Press, Beijing. pp: 129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Peng RH, Zhang T, Liu F, Ling J, Wang CY, Li SH, Zhang XD, Wang YH, Wang KB. 2012. Preparations of meiotic pachytene chromosomes and extended DNA fibers from cotton suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization. PLoS One, 7(3): e33847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng SF, Lin YP, Lin BY. 2004. Characterization of AFLP sequences from regions of maize B chromosome defined by 12 B-10L translocations. Genetics. 169: 375–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter HL, Rayburn AL. 1990. B-chromosome and C-band heterochromatin variation in Arizona maize populations adapted to different altitudes. Genome. 33: 659–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothfels KH, Siminovitch L. 1958. An air-drying technique for flattening chromosomes in mammalian cells grown in vitro. Stain Technol. 33: 73–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher T, Ambros P, Schweizer D. 1980. Application of Giemsa banding to orchid karyotype analysis. Plant Syst Evol. 134: 293–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzacher T, Leitch AR. 1994. Enzymatic treatment of plant material to spread chromosomes for in situ hybridization. Protoc Nucl Acid Anal Nonradioact Probes. 28: 153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Mehra P, Kumari J, Kumar S, Kumaria S, Tandon P, Rao SR. 2012. Physical localization and probable transcriptional activity of 18S–5.8S–26S rRNA gene loci in some Asiatic Cymbidiums (Orchidaceae) from northeast India. Gene. 499: 362–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer LA, Anderson LK, de Jong H, Smit S, Goicoechea JL, Roe BA, Hua A, Giovannoni JJ, Stack SM. 2014. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and optical mapping to correct scaffold arrangement in the tomato genome. Genes Genom Genet. 4: 1395–1405.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha RL, Ahn GS, Staples MI, Sathyan KM, Karpova TS, Foltz DR, Basrai MA. 2017. Mislocalization of centromeric histone H3 variant CENP-A contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN) in human cells. Oncotarget. 8: 46781–46800.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spurbeck JL, Zinsmeister AR, Meyer KJ, Jalal SM. 1996. Dynamics of chromosome spreading. Am J Med Genet. 61: 387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenvoort M, Rouwendal GJA, Kuiper-Groenwold G, van HHPJd V. 1994. Chromosome identification in potato trisomics (2n = 2x + 1 = 25) by conventional staining, Giemsa C-banding and non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Cytol Int J Cytol. 59: 405–417.
   Google Scholar
• Weise A, Gross M, Hinreiner S, Witthuhn V, Mkrtchyan H, Liehr T. 2010. POD-FISH: a new technique for parental origin determination based on copy number variation polymorphism. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): protocols and applications. Methods Mol Biol. 659: 291–298.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne DJ, Funabiki H. 2015. Kinetochore function is controlled by a phospho-dependent coexpansion of inner and outer components. J Cell Biol. 210: 899–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh HY, Lin CS, Chang SB. 2015. Cytogenetic and cytometric analyses in artificial intercytotypic hybrids of the emergent orchid model species Erycina pusilla. Euphytica. 206: 533–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong XB, de Jong JH, Zabel P. 1996. Preparation of tomato meiotic pachytene and mitotic metaphase chromosomes suitable for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chrom Res. 4: 24–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar