1,335
Views
50
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Experiential Learning=Hands-On+Minds-On

Pages 43-51 | Published online: 09 Oct 2015

References

  • Alexander, P. (1996), “The Past, Present, and Future of Knowledge Research: A Re-examination of the Role of Knowledge in Learning and Instruction,” Educational Psychologist, 31, 2, 89–92.
  • Dewey, J. (1933), How We Think, Boston: Heath.
  • Fiero, J. (1992), The Crawford Slip Method, Quality Press, 24, 5, 40–43.
  • Glaser, R. and Bassok M. (1989), “Learning Theory and the Study of Instruction,” Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 631–636.
  • Glen, S. and Nelson J. (1988), Raising Self-reliant Children in a Self-indulgent World: Seven Building Blocks for Developing Capable Young People, Rocklin: Prima Publishing and Communications.
  • Goldsmith, T.E. and Davenport D.M. (1989), “Assessing Structural Similarity of Graphs,” in R.W. Schvaneveldt (ed.), Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 75–87.
  • Hatcher, J.A. and Bringle R.G. (2000), “Reflection: Bridging the Gap Between Service and Learning,” College Teaching, 45, 4, 153–158.
  • Hodgson, A.M. (1992), “Hexagons for Systems Thinking,” European Journal of Operational Research, 59, 1, 220–30.
  • Holley, C.D. and Dansereau D.F. (1984), “Networking the Technique and the Empirical Evidence,” in C.D. Holley and D. F. Dansereau (eds.) Spatial Learning Strategies: Techniques, Applications and Related Issues, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Kinchin, I.M., Hay, D.B. and Adams A. (2000), “How a Qualitative Approach to Concept Map Analysis can be used to Aid Learning by Illustrating Patterns of Conceptual Development,” Educational Research, 42, 1, 43–57.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1981), “Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences,” in The Modern American College, (Ed.) A.W. Chickering and Associates, 232–255, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kotier, P. and Armstrong G. (2001), Principles of Marketing, Ninth edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Kozma, R.B., Jones J., Marx, N. and Davis J. (1996), “The Use of Multiple Linked Representations to Facilitate Science Understanding,” in International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments, (eds.) S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kumcu, E. and Kumcu A. (1998), “Undergraduate Student Consulting in Export Marketing: An Experiential Course in Electronic Resource Use,” Marketing Education Review, 8, 1, 59–72.
  • Langham, B. (1994), “Drawing It Out,” Successful Meetings, 43, 1, 114–16.
  • LeCair, D. T. and Stottinger B. (1999), “Using an Intensive Living Case in Graduate Marketing Courses: Experiences from an International Project,” Marketing Education Review, 9, 3, 31–40.
  • Lilien, G. L., Kotier, P. and Moorthy K. S. (1992), Marketing Models, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Linrud, J. K. and Hall, M. C. (1999), “Integrating the Business Practitioner into Marketing Coursework,” Marketing Education Review, 9, 2, 15–22.
  • Little, J. (1975), “BRANDAID: A Marketing Mix Model, Part 1: Structure; Part 2: Implementation,” Operations Research, 23, 628–673.
  • McClure, J.R., Sonak, B. and Suen H.K. (1999), “Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 4, 475–492.
  • McDermott, L.C. and Shaffer P.S. (1992), “Research as a Guide for Curriculum Development: An Example from Introductory Electricity, Part 1: Investigation of Student Understanding,” American Journal of Physics, 60, 11, 994–1003.
  • Novak, J.D. and Gowin D.B. (1984), Learning How to Learn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Owen, Robert S. (1999), “Using Programmed Branching to Automate Interactive Cases on the Web,” Marketing Education Review, 9, 3, 41–60.
  • Pressley, M. and McCormick C.B. (1995), Advanced Educational Psychology for Educators, Researchers, and Policymakers, New York: Harper Collins.
  • Rice, D.C., Ryan, J.M. and Samson S.M. (1998), “Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in the Science Classroom: Must Different Methods Compete?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 10, 1103–1127.
  • Sheckley, B.G., Allen, G.J. and Keeton M.T. (1993), “Adult Learning as Recursive Process,” Journal of Cooperative Education, 28, 56–67.
  • Stuart, H.A. (1985), “Should Concept Maps be Scored Numerically?” European Journal of Science Education, 7, 1, 73–81.
  • White, R. and Gunstone R. (1992), Probing Understanding, New York: Falmer Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.