Dealing with Student Group Project Traumas: Teaching Students Recognition, Responsibility, and Resolution of Group Project Problems

References

• Beatty, J. R., R. W. Haas, and D. Sciglimpaglia (1996), “Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects,” Journal of Marketing Education, 18 (Spring), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bolman, L. G. and T. E. Deal (1992), “What Makes a Team Work?” Organizational Dynamics, 21 (Autumn), 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, M. K. (1999), “The Role of Coaching in Student Teams: A ‘Just-in-Time’ Approach to Learning,” Journal of Management Education, 23 (Issue 3), 233–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. D. (1998), “Team Frames: The Multiple Realities of the Team,” Journal of Management Education, 22 (February), 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Bruzzese, A. (1991), “What Business Schools Aren't Teaching,” Incentive, 165 (March), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Clinebell, S. and M. Stecher (2003), “Teaching Teams to be Teams: An Exercise Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Five-Factor Personality Traits,” Journal of Management Education, 27 (June), 362–384.
   Google Scholar
• Connerley, M. L. and F. A. Mael (2001), “The Importance and Invasiveness of Student Team Selection Criteria,” Journal of Management Education, 25 (October), 471–495.
   Google Scholar
• Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. and R. Ramsey (1998), “Student Team Performance: A Method for Classroom Assessment,” Journal of Marketing Education, 20 (2), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Deeter-Schmelz, D. R. and R. Ramsey, K. N. Kennedy, and R. P. Ramsey (2002), “Enriching Our Understanding of Student Team Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing Education, 24 (2), 114–125.
   Google Scholar
• Dommeyer, C. J. (1986), “A Comparison of the Individual Proposal and the Team Project in the Marketing Research Course,” Journal of Marketing Education, 8 (Spring), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Essler, Ruth P., Jenny Swearingen, and Cathy Owens Swift (2005), “Cooperative Learning: Setting Up Students for Success Not Failure,” Special Session at the Association of Marketing Theory and Practice Conference (March 26), Jekyll Island, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Ettington, D. R. and R. R. Camp (2002), “Facilitating Transfer of Skills Between Groups Projects and Work Teams,” Journal of Management Education, 26 (August), 356–380.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., M. E. Zellmer-Bruhn, and D. P. Schwab (2003), “Team Effectiveness in Multinational Organizations: Evaluation Across Contexts,” Group & Organization Management, 28 (4), 444–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, A. L., R. W. Haas, and T. R. Wotruba (1998), “The Use of Self-Ratings and Peer Ratings to Evaluate Performances of Student Group Members,” Journal of Marketing Education, 20 (3), 200–209.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984), Culture's Consequences, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, L. C., J. Couper, and W. Jones (2002), “The Development and Consequences of Trust in Student Project Teams,” Journal of Marketing Education, 24 (April), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A., C. Chadwick, and S. M. Thatcher (1997), “To Agree or Not to Agree: The Effects of Value Congruence, Individual Demographic Dissimilarity, and Conflict on Workgroup Outcomes,” International Journal of Conflict Management, 8 (October), 287–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. and R. T. Johnson (1975), Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition and Individualization, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C. (2004), “Research on Impacts of Team Leadership on Team Effectiveness,” Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (Issue 1/2), 266–279.
   Google Scholar
• McCorkle, D. E., J. Reardon, J. F. Alexander, N. D. King, R. C. Harris, and R. V. Iyer (1999), “Undergraduate Marketing Students, Group Projects, and Teamwork: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?” Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (Issue 2), 106–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendall, M. (2000), “Teaching Groups to Become Teams,” Journal of Education for Business, 75 (May/June), 277–283.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, K. and M. Graham-Buxton (1993), “The Use of Collaborative Learning Groups in the Large Class: Is it Possible?” Teaching Sociology, 21, 403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. and R. Fennick (1987), “Collaborative Writing Student Interaction and Response,” Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 14, 214–216.
   Google Scholar
• Natale, S. M., S A. Sora, and S. B. Kavalipurapu (2004), “Leadership in Teams: Managerial Responses,” Team Performance Management, 10 (Issue 3/4), 45.
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. and J. G. Donelan (2003), “Team-Building Tools for Students,” Journal of Education for Business, 78 (January/February), 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Rau, W. and B. S. Heyl (1990), Humanizing the College Classroom Teach Expectations and Pupils’ Intellectual Development, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Razzouk, N. Y., V. Seitz, and E. Rizkallah (2003), “Learning by Doing: Using Experiential Projects in the Undergraduate Marketing Strategy Course,” Marketing Education Review, 13 (2), 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Scribner, L. L., T. L. Baker, and V. Howe (2003), “Efficacy of Group Projects in Support Skill Acquisition: Student Versus Alumni Perceptions,” Marketing Education Review, 13 (1), 59–66.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, R. F. and S. Hurd (2000), Using Student Teams in the Classroom: A Faculty Guide, Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, J. T. and R. E. Anderson (1990), “Free-Riding in Group Projects: Control Mechanisms and Preliminary Data,” Journal of Marketing Education, 12 (Summer), 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, J. M. and S. W. Lester (2001), “Applying a Team Effectiveness Framework to the Performance of Student Case Teams,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12 (4), 385–402.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. L., J. D. Beard, and J. Rymer (1991), “Team Projects: Achieving Their Full Potential,” Journal of Marketing Education, 13 (2), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Yeatts, D. E. and C. Hyten (1998), High-Petforming Self-Managed Work Teams: A Comparison of Theory to Practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar