Moving beyond Adoption: Exploring the Determinants of Student Intention to Use Technology

References

• Ajzen, Icek (1991), “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek and Martin Fishbein (1980), Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing (1988), “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin, 103 (3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbunan-Fich, Raquel, Hector R. Lozada, Stephen Pirog, Randi Priluc, and Joseph Wisenblit (2001), “Integrating Information Technology into the Marketing Curriculum: A Pragmatic Paradigm,” Journal of Marketing Education, 23 (April), 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, Alan J., Jarvis B. Moore, and Rich Rocco (2005), “Understanding Sales Force Automation Outcomes: A Managerial Perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, 34 (May), 369–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleberry, Stephen B. (2001), “Using Secondary Data in Marketing Research: A Project That Melds Web and Off-Web Sources,” Journal of Marketing Education, 23 (December), 195–203.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, Deborah R. and Christopher A. Higgins (1995), “Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills,” Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 118–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, Deborah R., Christopher A. Higgins, and Sid L. Huff (1999), “Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study,” MIS Quarterly, 23 (2), 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, Lee J. (1951), “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,” Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D. (1989), “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance,” MIS Quarterly, 13 (September), 319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Fred D., Richard P. Bagozzi, and Paul R. Warshaw (1992), “Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (14), 1111–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, Gary W. and Albert Segars (1999), “Redefining the High-Technology Classroom,” Journal of Education for Business, 74 (Jan/Feb), 152–156.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Joel R. (2001), “The Emerging Role of the Internet in Marketing Education: From Traditional Teaching to Technology-Based Education,” Marketing Education Review, 11 (Fall), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrell, O. C. and Linda Ferrell (2002), “Assessing Instructional Technology in the Classroom,” Marketing Education Review, 12 (Fall), 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin and Icek Ajzen (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hannaford, William, Robert Erffmeyer, and Chuck Tomkovick (2002), “Championing Technology in Marketing Education: Assessing The Value of a Discipline-Specific Technology Course,” Marketing Education Review, 12 (Fall), 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Paul J., Patrick Y. K. Chau, Olivia R. Liu Sheng, and Kar Yan Tam (1999), “Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (2), 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sörbom (2004), LISREL 8.71: Structural Equation Modeling, Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchmeyer, Catherine (2002), “Change and Stability in Manager's Gender Roles,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (October), 929–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, Patricia P., and N. Jane McCandless (2000), “The Impact of Age vs. Life Experiences on the Gender Role Attitudes of Women in Different Cohorts,” Journal of Women and Aging, 12 (2), 5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Naresh K. (2002), “Integrating Technology in Marketing Education: Perspective for the New Millennium,” Marketing Education Review, 12 (Fall), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieson, Kieran (1991), “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research, (2:3), 173–191.
   Google Scholar
• McBane, Donald A. (2003), “Getting the Horse to Drink: Teaching Technology to Marketing Students,” Marketing Education Review, 13 (Summer), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, Ronald E. and Greg W. Marshall (2002), “Perspectives on Selling and Sales Management Education,” Marketing Education Review, 12 (Summer), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Minton, Henry L. and Frank W. Schneider (1985), Differential Psychology, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintu-Wimsatt, Alma (2001), “Traditional Vs. Technology-Mediated Learning: A Comparison of Students’ Course Evaluations,” Marketing Education Review, 11 (Summer), 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Gary C. and Izak Benbasat (1991), “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research, 2 (3), 192–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, Jum C. and Ira Bernstein (1994), Psychometric Theory (3rd ed), New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Robert A., Gerald Albaum, Jose Luis Munuera, and William H. Cunningham (2002), “Reflections on the Use of Instructional Technologies in Marketing Education,” Marketing Education Review, 12 (Fall), 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Everett M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, Denise T., Craig A. Kelley and Jeffrey S. Conant (1999), “Marketing Education in the Year 2000: Changes Observed and Challenges Anticipated, ‘” Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (December), 206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Speier, Cheri and Viswanath Venkatesh (2002), “The Hidden Minefields in the Adoption of Sales Force Automation Technologies,” Journal of Marketing, 66 (3), 98–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Shirley and Peter A. Todd (1995), “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research, 6 (2), 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, Ronald L., Christopher A. Higgins, and Jane M. Howell (1991), “Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization,” MIS Quarterly, 15 (1), 124–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, 46 (2), 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis and Michael G. Morris (2000), “Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis (2003), “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, 27 (September), 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, Viswanath and Fred D. Davis, Michael G. Morris, and Phillip L. Ackerman (2000), “A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision Making Processes,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83 (1), 33–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar