A Multi-Dimensional Examination of Marketing Journal Rankings by North American Academics

References

• AACSB (2004), “Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation,” AACSB International, 1 (January), 1–74 http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/standards01-01-04.pdf accessed September 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Allen Consulting Group (2005), “Measuring the Impact of Publicly Funded Research,” DEST Commonwealth of Australia, Australia: Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• ANBAR (2003), “Literati Awards Archive,” (http://taddeo.emerald-library.com/vl=6697476/cl=l1/nw=l/rpsv/literaticlub/whatsnew/archive.htm accessed June 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (1994), “Business School Prestige-Research versus Teaching,” Interfaces, 24 (February), 13–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, B., S. J. Vitell, and G. M. Rose (2000), “Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Scholars and Marketing Departments,” Journal of Marketing Education, 22 (February), 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarter, H., and R. Pieters (2003), “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and it Subareas Over Time,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdie, D. R. (1989), “Reassessing the Value of High Response Rates to Mail Surveys,” Marketing Research, 1 (September), 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. T. W., K. C. Chan, and R. Y. K. Chan (2003), “Publications in Major Marketing Journals: An Analysis of Research Productivity of Asia-Pacific Universities,” Journal of Marketing Education, 25 (February), 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Chittenden, L., and R. Rettie (2003), “An Evaluation of E-mail Marketing and Factors Affecting Response,” Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 11 (March), 203–217.
   Google Scholar
• Corfman, K. (1991), “Perceptions of Relative Influence: Formation and Measurement,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (February), 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docsig (2003), “Who When Where 2003,” http://docsig.eci.gsu.edu, accessed Oct. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, G., and D. M. Easton (2003), “Marketing Journals and the Research Assessment Exercise,” Journal of Marketing Management, 19 (January-February), 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. P. (1998), “Scholarly Communication and Electronic Journals: An Impact Study,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (May), 507–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, J. M., and B. Keiller (2002), “Assessing Marketing Journals: A Mission-Based Approach,” Journal of the Academy of Business Education,” 3 (February), 70–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hult, G.T.M., W.T. Neese, and R.E. Bashaw (1997), “Faculty Perceptions of Marketing Journals,” Journal of Marketing Education, 19 (Spring), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jobber, D., and P. Simpson (1988), “A Citation Analysis of Selected Marketing Journals,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5 (June), 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Koojaroenprasit, N. A. Weinstein, W. J. Johnson, and D. O. Remington (1998), “Marketing Journal Rankings Revisited: Research Findings and Academic Implications,” Marketing Education Review, 8 (January), 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, R. H., and E. R. Doke (1987), “Marketing Journal Hierarchies: Faculty Perceptions 1986-1987,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15 (January), 74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrief, W. C., G. W. Marshall, and C. Watkins (2000), “Tracking Academic Research in Selling and Sales Management: Authors, Authorships, Academic Institutions and Journals,” The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 20 (February), 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Moodie, G. (2005), “Framework will Skew Uni Research,” The Australian, 23 Febuary, 38.
   Google Scholar
• Mort, G. S., J. R. McColl-Kennedy, G. Kiel, and G. N. Soutar (2004), “Australian and New Zealand Senior Academics’ Perceptions of Marketing Journals,” Australasian Marketing Journal, 12 (February), 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller (1993), “Marketing Journals and Asia Pacific Marketing Academics: An Exploratory Study,” Asia-Australia Marketing Journal, 1 (January), 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller (1998), “Using Student Projects to Link Academics, Employers and Students,” Journal of Teaching in International Business, 10 (February), 55–78.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller, G. Jones, and M. Kearsley (1999), “Accessibility, an Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals?” Journal of Marketing Education, 21 (April), 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller and P. Whitelaw (2004), “Exploring Multi-Dimensional Perceptual Ranking of Marketing Journals by North American Academics,” 2004 Summer American Marketing Association Educators Conference Summer, 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller (2004) “Journal Rankings: Does One Size Fit All,” Australasian Marketing Journal, 12 (February), 64–66.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., and D. Waller and P. Whitelaw (2005), “What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Journals?” Journal of Marketing Education, 27 (February), Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Razzaque M. A. (1998), “Scientific Method, Marketing Theory development and Academic vs Practitioner Orientation: A Review,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6 (January), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Shugan, S. M. (2003), “Journal Rankings: Save the Outlets for Your Research,” Marketing Science. 22 (April), 437–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straughan, R. D, and N. D. Albers-Miller (2000), “Marketing Education Research: Credit for the Advancement of our own Profession?” Journal of Marketing Management, 16 (July), 793–813.
   Google Scholar
• Tilburg University (2003), Academic Marketing Journals http://www.tilburguniversity.nl/faculties/few/marketing/links/journall.html, accessed May 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Theoharakis, V., and A. Hirst (2002), “Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective,” Marketing Letters, 13 (April), 398–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell, G. G., S. Parker, and C. Pettijohn (1995), “An Examination of the Research Productivity of Marketing Faculty of Newly Minted AACSB Schools,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 3 (February), 106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Uncles, M. (2004), “Journal Rankings: How Much Credence Should We Give Them?” Australasian Marketing Journal, 12 (February), 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, G.M. (2004), “Accessing Academic Research through an E-Database: Issues of Journal Quality and Knowledge Use,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32 (April), 369–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, G.M. (2003), “A Look to the Future of JAMS: Three Years Out, Thirty Years Out…” Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 31 (March), 225–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, G.M., and T.W. Leigh (1999), “Assessing the Quality Ranking of the Journal of Advertising, 1986-1997,” Journal of Advertising, 28 (February), 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar