Psychometric validation of the Homelessness Star

References

• Arbuckle, J. L. (2014). Amos (Version 23.0) [Computer Program]. IBM SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M., & Kara, H. (2013). Putting evaluations to use: from measuring to endorsing social value. Working Paper. Third Sector Research Centre (TSRC). http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/generic/tsrc/documents/tsrc/working-papers/working-paper-110.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagwell, S. (2013). Outcomes Map: Housing and essential needs, NPC, February 2013: Version 1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D., & Kerlin, L. (2015). Can health trainers make a difference with difficult-to-engage clients? A multisite case study. Health Promotion Practice, 16(5), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839915572802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battrick, T., Hilbery, O., & Holloway, S. (2013). Findings from the making every adult matter (MEAM) service pilots: A summary paper. Advances in Dual Diagnosis, 6(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/ADD-02-2013-0003
   Google Scholar
• Bimrose, J., Barnes, S. A., & Hughes, D. (2008). Adult career progression and advancement: A five year study of the effectiveness of guidance. Warwick Institute for Employment Research and the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, S., Graham, K., & MacKeith, J. (2006). The Outcomes Star: Organizational guide. Triangle Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65(3), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, G., Weleminsky, J., Onifade, Y., & Sugarman, P. (2012). Recovery Star: validating user recovery. The Psychiatrist, 36(2), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.111.034264
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H., & Neal, C. (2011). Single point of access to third sector services: The Conwy collaborative approach. Journal of Integrated Care, 19(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.5042/jic.2011.0160
   Google Scholar
• DTZ. (2007). Supporting people outcomes framework final report. Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Dunt, D. R., Benoy, A. W., Phillipou, A., Collister, L. L., Crowther, E. M., Freidin, J., & Castle, D. J. (2017). Evaluation of an integrated housing and recovery model for people with severe and persistent mental illnesses: The Doorway program. Australian Health Review, 41(5), 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esan, F., Case, K., Louis, J., Kirby, J., Cheshire, L., Keefe, J, & Petty, M. (2012). Implementing a patient centred recovery approach in a secure learning disabilities service. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 3, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Flatau, P., & Zaretzky, K. (2008). The economic evaluation of homelessness programmes. European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 305–320.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Good, A. (2020). Briefing: the development process for new versions of the Outcomes Star™. Triangle Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Good, A., & MacKeith, J. (2021). Assessing family functioning: Psychometric evaluation of the Family Star Plus. Family Relations, 70(2), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, C. A., Heinkel, S., & Dock, B. (2015). Enhancing recovery: Transition intervention service for return to the community following exit from an alternative to psychiatric inpatient admission – A residential recovery house. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 10(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-09-2014-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., & Andrews, A. (2013). Implementing the Outcomes Star well in a multi-disciplinary environment. RMIT University, The Salvation Army, Crisis Services Network.
   Google Scholar
• Hearne, L. (2010). Progression measurement in adult guidance in Ireland: A contested discourse. Adult Learner: The Irish Journal of Adult and Community Education, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, C., Miller, S., Hanratty, J., Pigott, T., Hamilton, J., & Coughlan, C. (2020). Accommodation-based programmes for individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Centre for Homelessness Impact. https://bit.ly/CHIAccom
   Google Scholar
• Killaspy, H., White, S., Taylor, T. L., & King, M. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Mental Health Recovery Star. British Journal of Psychiatry, 201(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.111.107946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., & Griffiths, C. (2013). Supporting recovery in a third sector alternative to psychiatric hospital admission: Evaluation of routinely collected outcome data. The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 8(3), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMHTEP-04-2013-0016
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, A. J., & Fugard, A. J. (2015). Routine mental health outcome measurement in the UK. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(4), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1015505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKeith, J. (2011). The development of the Outcomes Star: A participatory approach to assessment and outcome measurement. Housing, Care and Support, 14(3), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/14608791111199778
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Youth Agency. (2018). The future for outcomes A practical guide to measuring outcomes for young people. www.nya.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Future-for-Outcomes-Guide1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Onifade, Y. (2011). The Mental Health Recovery Star. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 15(2), 78–87. 10.1108
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, M., Moniruzzaman, A., Palepu, A., Zabkiewicz, D., Frankish, C. J., Krausz, M., & Somers, J. M. (2013). Housing first improves subjective quality of life among homeless adults with mental illness: 12-month findings from a randomized controlled trial in Vancouver, British Columbia. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(8), 1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0719-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, V. A., Ellis, P., Lorenz, R., & Armbrecht, E. (2014). An interventional study of guiding homeless persons to self-reliance using the Outcomes Star™ for homelessness. Clinical Scholars Review, 7(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1891/1939-2095.7.1.30
   Google Scholar
• Placentino, A., Lucchi, F., Scarsato, G., & Fazzari, G. (2017). Mental Health Recovery Star: features and validation study of the Italian version. Rivista di Psichiatria, 52(6), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1708/2846.28728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1999). The audit society. Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, T., & Schwarz, M. A. (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kerwer, M., & Klein, A. G. (2014). Evaluation of model fit in nonlinear multilevel structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. (2015). Measuring member engagement: Building a model of change? Co-operatives for sustainable communities, pp. 239–265.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, G. (2014). Coaching desistance? Life coaching for offenders in a ‘who works’ environment. Probation Journal, 61(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550514548255
   Google Scholar
• Triangle. (2019). Client survey report. Triangle Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., Beaman, J., & Sponarski, C. C. (2017). Rethinking internal consistency in Cronbach's alpha. Leisure Sciences, 39, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J., & Edgar, B. (2007). Measuring quality of services and provision in homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness, 1, 15–39.
   Google Scholar
• York Consulting. (2013). Family Action Family Star Evaluation: Summary Report. Retrieved from www.family-action.org.uk
   Google Scholar