735
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Prevention Approaches and Guidelines

K–12 School Employee Sexual Abuse and Misconduct: An Examination of Policy Effectiveness

&
Pages 200-221 | Received 15 Sep 2017, Accepted 01 Feb 2019, Published online: 27 Feb 2019

References

  • Agranoff, R., & Lindsay, V. (1983, May). Intergovernmental management: Perspectives from human services problem solving at the local level. Public Administration Review, 43(3), 227–237. doi:10.2307/976331
  • American Association of University Women (AAUW). (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Chen, L. P., Murad, M. H., Paras, M. L., Colbenson, K. M., Sattler, A. L., Goranson, E. N., … Zirakzadeh, A. (2010). Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 85(7), 618–629. doi:10.4065/mcp.2009.0583
  • Corbett, K., Gentry, C., & Pearson, W., Jr. (1993). Sexual harassment in high school. Youth and Society, 25(1), 93–103. doi:10.1177/0044118X93025001006
  • Crenshaw, W., Crenshaw, L., & Lichtenberg, J. (1995). When educators confront child abuse: An analysis of the decision to report. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(9), 1095–1113. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(95)00071-F
  • Dillman, D. (2007). Mail and internet surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Dube, S., Felitti, V., Dong, M., Chapman, D., Giles, W., & Anda, R. (2003). Childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction and the risk of illicit drug use: The adverse childhood experiences study. Pediatrics, 111(3), 564–572. doi:10.1542/peds.111.3.564
  • Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Fowler, L. (2018). Local managerial perceptions of intergovernmental management. State and Local Government Review, 50(1), 6–14. doi:10.1177/0160323X18769974
  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
  • Government Accountability Office. (2010). K–12 education: Selected cases of public and private schools that hired or retained individuals with histories of sexual misconduct. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-11-200. Reterived from http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-200
  • Government Accountability Office. (2014). Child welfare: Federal agencies can better support state efforts to prevent and respond to sexual abuse by school personnel. Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Education and the Workforce, House of Representatives. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-14-42. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/660375.pdf
  • Grant, B. (2010, June 16). The challenges of keeping sexual predators out of the classroom. Education Week, 29, 36.
  • Grant, B. (2011). Educator sexual abuse in Virginia: A policy study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia. Retrieved from https://libra2.lib.virginia.edu/public_view/qn59q426c
  • Grant, B., Wilkerson, S., Pelton, D., Cosby, A., & Henschel, M. (2017). K–12 School Employee Sexual Misconduct: Lessons Learned from Title IX Policy Implementation.
  • Hall, P. (1995). The consequences of qualitative analysis for sociological theory: Beyond the microlevel. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(2), 397–423. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1995.tb00445.x
  • Hamilton, M. (2008). Justice denied. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Heinecke, W. (1997). Desegregation as the transformation of intentions: A case study. Ann Arbor: UMI microfilm.
  • Henschel, M., & Grant, B. (2018, June 20). Exposing school employee sexual abuse and misconduct: Shedding light on a sensitive issue. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1–20. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1483459
  • Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 1–24). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Kenny, M. (2001). Child abuse reporting: Teachers’ perceived deterrents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(1), 81–92. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00218-0
  • Kirst, M. (1995). Recent research on intergovernmental relations in education policy. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 18–22. doi:10.3102/0013189X024009018
  • Kirst, M., & Jung, R. (1986). Beyond mutual adaptation, into the bully pulpit: Recent research on the federal role in education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 80–109.
  • Lee, J. (2017). Why have policies often remained symbolic? Understanding the reasons for decoupling between policy and practice. Review of Policy Research, 34(5), 617–635. doi:10.1111/ropr.2017.34.issue-5
  • Lee, R., & Renzetti, C. (1993). Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lusi, S. (1994). Systemic reform: Challenges faced by state departments of education. Washington, DC: ASCD Yearbook.
  • Marsh, J., & Wohlstetter, P. (2013). Recent trends in intergovernmental relations: The resurgence of local actors in education policy. Educational Researcher, 42(5), 276–283. doi:10.3102/0013189X13492193
  • Mcdonnell, L., & Weatherford, M. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 233–242. doi:10.3102/0013189X16649945
  • McGlone, A. (2018, May 10). How predatory teachers stay on the job. Voice of San Diego.
  • McGuire, M., & Silvia, C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 279–288. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-2
  • McKee, D. (2017). Liability of school districts under common law tort theories for the sexual molestation of a student by a teacher. American Jurisprudence Proof of Facts, 31, 3d 261. Thomson Reuters.
  • McLaughlin, M. (1991). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. In A. R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 185–196). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • McLaughlin, M. (2006). Implementation research in education: Lessons learned, lingering questions and new opportunities. In M. Honig (Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation (pp. 209–228). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Monnat, S., & Chandler, R. (2015, Sept.). Long term physical health consequences of adverse childhood experiences. Sociology Quarterly, 56(4), 723–752. doi:10.1111/tsq.12107
  • Nathan, M., & Mitroff, I. (1991, June). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational field. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 163–180. doi:10.1177/0021886391272002
  • Noll, J., Trickett, P., & Putnam, F. (2003). A prospective investigation of the impact of childhood sexual abuse on the development of sexuality. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 575–586.
  • O’Hagan, M. (2004, February 23). Teacher conduct proposal may get diluted. The Seattle Times.
  • O’Toole, L., Peters, B., & Pierre, J. (2012). Interorganizational relations and policy implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration (pp. 292–304). Boston, Massachusetts : Credo Reference.
  • OCR. (2001). Revised sexual harassment guidance: Harassment of students by school employees, other students, or third parties. US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/shguide.pdf.
  • OCR. (2008). Sexual harassment: It’s not academic. US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/ocrshpam.pdf.
  • Office for Civil Rights (OCR). (1997). Sexual harassment guidance: Harassment of students by school employees, other students, or third parties. US Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/sexhar01.html.
  • Park, J. (2003, April 30). State policies on sexual misconduct between educators and students. Education Week.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Pryor, D. (1996). Unspeakable acts: Why men sexually abuse children. New York: New York University Press.
  • Ratliff, L., Watson, J., & Hall, K. R. (2017). Preventing sexual misconduct: A guide for teachers, counselors, and administrators. In C. Schwilk, R. Stevenson, & D. Bateman (Eds.), Sexual misconduct in the education and human services sector (pp. 24–42). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Reilly, S. (2016, December 22). Teachers who sexually abuse students still find classroom jobs. USA Today.
  • Rein, M. (1976). Social science and public policy. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
  • Rigby, J., Woulfin, S., & März, V. (2016). Understanding how structure and agency influence education policy implementation and organizational change. American Journal of Education, 122(3), 295–302. doi:10.1086/685849
  • Rosen, L. (2012). Rhetoric and symbolic action in the policy process. In Sykes, G., Schneider, B., Plank, D., & Ford, T (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 283–301). Chicago, NY: Routledge.
  • Sabatier, P. A. (2015). 13 Two decades of implementation research: From control to guidance and learning. The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, 31, 257.
  • Schultz, P. (2005). Not monsters: Analyzing the stories of child molesters. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Shakeshaft, C. (2004). Educator sexual misconduct: A synthesis of existing literature. U.S. Department of Education, Doc #2004-09. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/misconductreview/report.pdf.
  • Shakeshaft, C. (2013). Know the warning signs of educator sexual misconduct. Phi Delta Kappan Magazine, 94(5), 8–13. doi:10.1177/003172171309400503
  • Shakeshaft, C., & Cohan, A. (1995, March). Sexual abuse of students by school personnel. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 512–520.
  • Shoop, R. (2004). Sexual exploitation in schools: How to spot it and how to stop it. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Shore, C. (2012). Anthropology and public policy. In Gledhill, R., Fardon, J., Gledhill, John, & Fardon, Richard (EDs.), The Sage handbook of social anthropology (pp. 89–104). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Slaven, M., & Boswell, C. (2018). Why symbolise control? Irregular migration to the UK and symbolic policy-making in the 1960s. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1459522
  • Smith, M. L., Miller-Kahn, L., Heinecke, W., & Jarvis, P. (2004). Political spectacle and the fate of American schools. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
  • Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(1), 1–27. doi:10.3102/01623737021001001
  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. doi:10.3102/00346543072003387
  • Stone, D. (2001). Policy paradox: The art of political decision-making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • van Hoof, L., Kraan, M., Visser, N., Avoyan, E., Batsleer, J., & Trapman, B. (2019). Muddying the waters of the landing obligation: How multi-level governance structures can obscure policy implementation. In Springer Nature Switzerland (Ed.), The European landing obligation (pp. 179–196). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Werts, A. B., & Brewer, C. A. (2015). Reframing the study of policy implementation: Lived experience as politics. Educational Policy, 29(1), 206–229. doi:10.1177/0895904814559247
  • Wildavsky, A. (1987). Choosing preferences by constructing institutions: A cultural theory of preference formation. American Political Science Review, 81(1), 3–21. doi:10.2307/1960776
  • Willmsen, C., & O’Hagan, M. (2003, December 14–16). Coaches who prey. The Seattle Times.
  • Yanow, D. (2015). 21 Making sense of policy practices: Interpretation and meaning. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies (pp. 401–402).
  • Yin, R. (1982). Studying the implementation of public programs. In W. Williams (Ed.), Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues (pp. 37–72). Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House.
  • Young, T., & Lewis, W. D. (2015). Educational policy implementation revisited. Educational Policy, 29(1), 3–17. doi:10.1177/0895904815568936

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.