“To get the word out”: LGBTQ+ Young adults’ motivations for participating in qualitative research studies

References

• Abrams, L. S. (2010). Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research: The case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice, 9(4), 536–550. doi:10.1177/1473325010367821
   Google Scholar
• Bain, A. L., & Payne, W. J. (2016). Queer de-participation: Reframing the co-production of scholarly knowledge. Qualitative Research, 16(3), 330–340. doi:10.1177/1468794115619002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202. doi:10.1080/13645570050083689
   Google Scholar
• Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., … Hughes, C. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 42. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown-Saracino, J. (2014). From methodological stumbles to substantive insights: Gaining ethnographic access in queer communities. Qualitative Sociology, 37(1), 43–68. doi:10.1007/s11133-013-9271-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2008). We're over-researched here!' Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology, 42(5), 953–970. doi:10.1177/0038038508094573
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. (2010). On ‘being researched’: Why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419. doi:10.1177/1468794110366796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M., Shattell, M., & Thomas, S. P. (2005). Problematic interviewee behaviors in qualitative research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 27(2), 188–199. doi:10.1177/0193945904268068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 335–354. doi:10.1177/1077800403009003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch, J., Durant, B., & Hill, J. (2012). Young people, old issues: Methodological concerns in research with highly marginalised young people. Youth Studies Australia, 31(4), 46.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face? Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353. doi:10.1177/1468794107078515
   Google Scholar
• Dyregrov, K. (2004). Bereaved parents’ experience of research participation. Social Science & Medicine, 58(2), 391–400. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00205-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellard-Gray, A., Jeffrey, N. K., Choubak, M., & Crann, S. E. (2015). Finding the hidden participant: Solutions for recruiting hidden, hard-to-reach, and vulnerable populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5), 1–10. doi:10.1177/1609406915621420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J. (2002). The impact of an LGBT safe zone project on campus climate. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 522–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. doi:10.1002/sce.20414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: Methodological and ethical issues. Women's Studies International Forum, 23(1), 89–105. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00095-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16–e31. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-López, G. (2011). Mindful ethics: Comments on informant-centered practices in sociological research. Qualitative Sociology, 34(3), 447. doi:10.1007/s11133-011-9199-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344. doi:10.1080/13645570802246724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, N. D., Freeman, K., & Swann, S. (2009). Healthcare preferences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 222–229. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irazábal, C., & Huerta, C. (2016). Intersectionality and planning at the margins: LGBTQ youth of color in New York. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(5), 714–732. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2015.1058755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (2006). Interchanges: Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: The complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105–121. doi:10.1177/1464700106061462
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. W., & Parry, D. C., eds. (2016). Fostering social justice through qualitative inquiry: A methodological guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knapik, M. (2006). The qualitative research interview: Participants' responsive participation in knowledge making. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 77–93. doi:10.1177/160940690600500308
   Google Scholar
• Kurzwell, J. (2008). Shattering the glass closet. Science Magazine, American Association for the Advancement of Science. Retrieved September 13, 2017 from http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/features/2008/12/shattering-glass-closet.
   Google Scholar
• LaSala, M. C. (2003). When interviewing “Family” maximizing the insider advantage in the qualitative study of lesbians and gay men. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 15(1–2), 15–30. doi:10.1300/J041v15n01_02
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. O., & Lee, R. M. (2012). Methodological research on “sensitive” topics: A decade review. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 114(1), 35–49. doi:10.1177/0759106312437139
   Google Scholar
• Levy, D. L. (2013). On the outside looking in? The experience of being a straight, cisgender qualitative researcher. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 25(2), 197–209. doi:10.1080/10538720.2013.782833
   Google Scholar
• Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods, London, England: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, M. F., Fleming, T. M., & Merry, S. N. (2017). Tips for research recruitment: The views of sexual minority youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(1), 16–30. doi:10.1080/19361653.2016.1256246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. I., & Meezan, W. (2003). Applying ethical standards to research and evaluations involving lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 15(1-2), 181–201. doi:10.1300/J041v15n01_12
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Mustanski, B. (2011). Ethical and regulatory issues with conducting sexuality research with LGBT adolescents: A call to action for a scientifically informed approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 673–686. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9745-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2006). “It's no skin off my nose”: Why people take part in qualitative research”. Qualitative Health Research, 16(10), 1335–1349. doi:10.1177/1049732306294511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, M. J., & Miller-Day, M. (2007). Upward turning points and positive rapport-development across time in researcher—participant relationships. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 177–201. doi:10.1177/1468794107071409
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. J., Miller, R. L., Nnawulezi, N., & Valenti, M. T. (2012). Erecting closets and outing ourselves: Uncomfortable reflexivity and community‐based research. Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1), 11–26. doi:10.1002/jcop.20491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, K. A. (2007). LGBT student leaders and queer activists: Identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identified college student leaders and activists. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 311–330. doi:10.1353/csd.2007.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S. T. (2005). Beyond risk: Resilience in the lives of sexual minority youth. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Issues in Education, 2(3), 5–18. doi:10.1300/J367v02n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. T., Muraco, A., Subramaniam, A., & Laub, C. (2009). Youth empowerment and high school gay-straight alliances. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(7), 891–903. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9382-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., & Tyler, K. A. (2018a). LGBTQ+ young adults on the street and on campus: Identity as a product of social context. Journal of homosexuality, 65(2), 197–223. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1314162
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., & Tyler, K. A. (2018b). The complexity of family reactions to identity among homeless and college lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1195–1207. doi:10.1007/s10508-017-1014-5
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, R. M., Sanchez, J., & Lopez, B. (2018). LGBTQ+ Latinx young adults' health autonomy in resisting cultural stigma. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13691058.2018.1441443
   Google Scholar
• Shattell, M. M., McAllister, S., Hogan, B., & Thomas, S. P. (2006). “She took the time to make sure she understood”: Mental health patients' experiences of being understood. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20(5), 234–241. doi:10.1016/j.apnu.2006.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skobba, K., Meyers, D., & Tiller, L. (2018). Getting by and getting ahead: Social capital and transition to college among homeless and foster youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slegers, C., Zion, D., Glass, D., Kelsall, H., Fritschi, L., Brown, N., & Loff, B. (2015). Why do people participate in epidemiological research? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(2), 227–237. doi:10.1007/s11673-015-9611-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, A. L. (2018). The geography of research on LGBTQ Life: Why sociologists should study the South, rural queers, and ordinary cities. Sociology Compass, 12(11), e12638. doi:10.1111/soc4.12638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, R. P., Sengupta, S., Kegeles, S., McLellan, E., Metzger, D., Eyre, S., … MacQueen, K. M. (2001). Willingness to volunteer in future preventive HIV vaccine trials: Issues and perspectives from three US communities. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 26(1), 63–71. doi:10.1097/00042560-200101010-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G., & Losberg, W. (2003). A study of sampling in research in the field of lesbian and gay studies. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 15(1-2), 147–162. doi:10.1300/J041v15n01_10
   Google Scholar
• Talburt, S. (2004). Constructions of LGBT youth: Opening up subject positions. Theory into Practice, 43(2), 116–121. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4302_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarpey, M. (2006). Why people get involved in health and social care research: A working paper. Eastleigh: INVOLVE.
   Google Scholar
• Tortu, S., Goldsamt, L. A., & Hamid, R. (Eds.). (2002). A practical guide to research and service with hidden populations. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, K. A., & Schmitz, R. M. (2017). Using cell phones for data collection: Benefits, outcomes, and intervention possibilities with homeless youth. Children and Youth Services Review, 76, 59–64. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.02.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Bergh, N., & Crisp, C. (2004). Defining culturally competent practice with sexual minorities: Implications for social work education and practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 40(2), 221–238. doi:10.1080/10437797.2004.10778491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolgemuth, J. R., Erdil-Moody, Z., Opsal, T., Cross, J. E., Kaanta, T., Dickmann, E. M., & Colomer, S. (2015). Participants’ experiences of the qualitative interview: Considering the importance of research paradigms. Qualitative Research, 15(3), 351–372. doi:10.1177/1468794114524222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. J., & McKinley, C. J. (2010). Mental health resources for LGBT collegians: A content analysis of college counseling center web sites. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(1), 138–147. doi:10.1080/00918369.2011.533632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar