Selecting Promising Treatments in Randomized Phase II Cancer Trials with an Active Control

REFERENCES

• Bischoff , W. , Miller , F. ( 2005 ). Adaptive two-stage test procedures to find the best treatment in clinical trials . Biometrika 92 : 197 – 212 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung , Y. K. ( 2008 ). Simple sequential boundaries for treatment selection in multi-armed randomized clinical trials with a control . Biometrics 64 : 940 – 949 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung , Y. K. , Gordon , P. H. , Levin , B. ( 2006 ). Selecting promising ALS therapies in clinical trials . Neurology 67 : 1748 – 1751 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg , Y. , Tamhane , A. C. ( 1987 ). Multiple Comparison Procedures . New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Jung , S. H. ( 2008 ). Randomized Phase II trials with a prospective control . Stat. Med. 27 : 568 – 583 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrison , T. G. , Maitland , M. L. , Stadler , W. M. , Ratain , M. J. ( 2007 ). Design of Phase II cancer trials using a continuous endpoint of change in tumor size: Application to a study of sorafenib and erlotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer . J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99 : 1455 – 1461 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu , C.-S. , Levin , B. ( 1999a ). On the probability of correct selection in the Levin–Robbins sequential elimination procedure . Statistica Sinica 9 : 879 – 891 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leu , C.-S. , Levin , B. ( 1999b ). Proof of a lower bound formula for the expected reward in the Levin-Robbins sequential elimination procedure . Sequential Analysis 18 : 81 – 105 .
   Google Scholar
• Levin , B. , Robbins , H. ( 1981 ). Selecting the highest probability in binomial or multinomial trials . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78 : 4663 – 4666 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis , L. C. , Ratain , M. J. ( 2006 ). Measuring response in a post-RECIST world: From black and white to shades of grey . Nature Reviews Cancer 6 : 409 – 414 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins , H. , Siegmund , D. O. ( 1974 ). Sequential tests involving two populations . J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 69 : 132 – 139 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaid , D. J. , Wieand , S. , Therneau , T. M. ( 1990 ). Optimal two-stage screening designs for survival comparisons . Biometrika 77 : 507 – 513 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon , R. , Wittes , R. E. , Ellenberg , S. S. ( 1985 ). Randomized Phase II clinical trials . Cancer Treatment Reports 69 : 1375 – 1381 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slepian , D. ( 1962 ). The one-sided barrier problem for normal noise . Bell System Tech. J. 41 : 463 – 501 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , J. M. G. , Braun , T. M. , Li , Z. ( 2006 ). Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: Relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design . Clinical Trial 3 : 335 – 348 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thall , P. F. , Simon , R. , Ellenberg , S. S. ( 1988 ). Two-stage selection and testing designs for comparative clinical trials . Biometrika 75 : 303 – 310 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar