Bias-adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies

References

• Austin, P. C. 2007. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Statistics in Medicine 26:3078–3094. doi:10.1002/sim.2781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. 2011. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: An application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46:119–151. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.540480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C., P. Grootendorst, and G. M. Anderson. 2007. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: A monte carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 26:734–753. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C. G. 2012. Uniform improvement of empirical likelihood for missing response problem. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6:289–302. doi:10.1214/12-EJS673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C. G., S. C. P. Yam, and Z. Zhang. 2016. Globally efficient non-parametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 78:673. doi:10.1111/rssb.12129.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. T. 2013. Statistical issues and challenges in immuno-oncology. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer 1:18. doi:10.1186/2051-1426-1-18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cole, S. R., and M. A. Hernán. 2004. Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Computer Methods & Programs in Biomedicine 75:45–49. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D‘Agostino, R. B. 1998. Tutorial in biostatistics: Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in Medicine 17:2265–2281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, S., P. C. Austin, J. V. Tu, D. T. Ko, C. D. Mazer, A. Kiss, and S. E. Fremes. 2016. A review of propensity-score methods and their use in cardiovascular research. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32:259–265. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2015.05.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J. 2011. Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis 20: mpr025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, P., and L. Wang. 2013. Estimation with missing data: Beyond double robustness. Biometrika 100:417–430. doi:10.1093/biomet/ass087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. E. Todd. 1997. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 64:605–654. doi:10.2307/2971733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellerstein, J. K., and G. W. Imbens. 1999. Imposing moment restrictions from auxiliary data by weighting. Review of Economics and Statistics 81:1–14. doi:10.1162/003465399557860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirano, K., G. W. Imbens, and G. Ridder. 2003. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica 71:1161–1189. doi:10.1111/ecta.2003.71.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoos, A., A. M. Eggermont, S. Janetzki, F. S. Hodi, R. Ibrahim, A. Anderson, R. Humphrey, B. Blumenstein, L. Old, and J. Wolchok. 2010. Improved endpoints for cancer immunotherapy trials. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imai, K., and M. Ratkovic. 2014. Covariate balancing propensity score. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 76:243–263. doi:10.1111/rssb.12027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J. D. Y., and J. L. Schafer. 2007. Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science 22:574–580. doi:10.1214/07-STS227REJ.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. L., and P. Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53:457–481. doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunceford, J. K., and M. Davidian. 2004. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine 23:2937–2960. doi:10.1002/sim.v23:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwogu, C. E., J. D‘Cunha, H. Pang, L. Gu, X. Wang, W. G. Richards, L. J. Veit, T. L. Demmy, D. J. Sugarbaker, and L. J. Kohman. 2015. VATS lobectomy has better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy: CALGB 31001, an ancillary analysis of CALGB 140202 (Alliance). Annals of Thoracic Surgery 99:399–405. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, A. B. 2001. Empirical likelihood. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putter, H., M. Sasako, H. Hartgrink, C. Van de Velde, and J. Van Houwelingen. 2005. Long-term survival with non-proportional hazards: Results from the dutch gastric cancer trial. Statistics in Medicine 24:2807–2821. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. 2017. Biased sampling, over-identified parameter problems and beyond. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., and B. Zhang. 2007. Empirical-likelihood-based inference in missing response problems and its application in observational studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 69:101–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J. M., A. Rotnitzky, and L. P. Zhao. 1994. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89:846–866. doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. 1987. Model-based direct adjustment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82:387–394. doi:10.1080/01621459.1987.10478441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1984. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79:516–524. doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1985. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 103–116. doi:10.2307/2530647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, R. E., S. A. Anderson, G. J. Dal Pan, G. W. Gray, T. Gross, N. L. Hunter, L. LaVange, D. Marinac-Dabic, P. W. Marks, M. A. Robb, et al. 2016. Real-world evidence-what is it and what can it tell us. The New England Journal of Medicine 375:2293–2297. doi:10.1056/NEJMsb1609216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., and P. E. Todd. 2005. Does matching overcome LaLonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators? Journal of Econometrics 125:305–353. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsiatis, A. 2006. Semiparametric theory and missing data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., and C. Liu. 2005. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test with inverse probability of treatment weighting for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 24:3089–3110. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, X. I., X. Wang, P. J. Speicher, E. S. Hwang, P. Cheng, D. H. Harpole, M. F. Berry, D. Schrag, and H. H. Pang. 2017. Reporting and guidelines in propensity score analysis: A systematic review of cancer and cancer surgical studies. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 109:djw323. doi:10.1093/jnci/djw323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar