Assessment of nonlinear dose–response relationships via nonparametric regression

References

• Barretina, J., G. Caponigro, N. Stransky, K. Venkatesan, A. A. Margolin, S. Kim, C. J. Wilson, J. Lehár, G. V. Kryukov, D. Sonkin, et al. 2012. The cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 483(7391):603–607. doi:10.1038/nature11003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. 1941. Statistical problems in estimating populations of Japanese beetle larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology 34 (2):221–232. doi:10.1093/jee/34.2.221.
   Google Scholar
• Boeckmann, A., L. Sheiner, and S. Beal. 1994. NONMEM users guide: Part v, NONMEM project group.
   Google Scholar
• Bornkamp, B., F. Bretz, A. Dmitrienko, G. Enas, B. Gaydos, C. -H. Hsu, F. König, M. Krams, Q. Liu, B. Neuenschwander, et al. 2007. Innovative approaches for designing and analyzing adaptive dose-ranging trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 17(6):965–995. doi:10.1080/10543400701643848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornkamp, B., J. Pinheiro, and F. Bretz. 2018. DoseFinding: Planning and analyzing dose finding experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, A. W., and A. Azzalini. 1997. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: The kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations, Vol. 18. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, A., and A. Azzalini. (2018), sm : Smoothing Methods for Nonparametric Regression and Density Estimation. R package version 2.2-5.6. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sm
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, J. L. O. (2018), locpol: Kernel Local Polynomial Regression. R package version 0.7-0. URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=locpol
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese, E. J., and L. A. Baldwin. 1999. Reevaluation of the fundamental dose–response relationship: A new database suggests that the u-shaped, rather than the sigmoidal, curve predominates. BioScience 49 (9):725–732. doi:10.2307/1313596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. M., and D. J. Svendsgaard. 1990. U-shaped dose-response curves: Their occurrence and implications for risk assessment. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A Current Issues 30 (2):71–83. doi:10.1080/15287399009531412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Veroli, G. Y., C. Fornari, I. Goldlust, G. Mills, S. B. Koh, J. L. Bramhall, F. M. Richards, and D. I, Jodrell. 2015. An automated fitting procedure and software for dose-response curves with multiphasic features. Scientific Reports 5 (1):14701. doi:10.1038/srep14701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dragalin, V., B. Bornkamp, F. Bretz, F. Miller, S. K. Padmanabhan, N. Patel, I. Perevozskaya, J. Pinheiro, and J. R., Smith. 2010. A simulation study to compare new adaptive dose–ranging designs. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research 2 (4):487–512. doi:10.1198/sbr.2010.09045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, R., P. Edwards, R. Ekins, D. Finney, I. McKenzie, G. Raab, D. Rodbard, and R. Rodgers. 1985. Guidelines for immunoassay data processing. Clinical Chemistry 31 (8):1264–1271. doi:10.1093/clinchem/31.8.1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong, T. (2022), ks: Kernel Smoothing. R package version 1.13.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ks
   Google Scholar
• EMA. 2014. “‘Qualification opinion” of MCP-Mod as an efficient statistical methodology for model-based design and analysis of phase ii dose finding studies under model uncertainty’.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J., and I. Gijbels. 2003. Local polynomial modelling and its applications. In Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Boca Raton.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2015. “‘Fit-for-purpose qualification” of MCP-Mod as an efficient statistical methodology for model-based design and analysis of phase ii dose finding studies under model uncertainty’.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2022. “‘Fit-for-purpose qualification” of empirically based bayesian emax models for dose response design and analysis’.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, D. J. 1964. Statistical method in Biological assay. London: Charles Griffin & Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P., and J. R. Dunn. 2005. The five-parameter logistic: A characterization and comparison with the four-parameter logistic. Analytical Biochemistry 343 (1):54–65. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2005.04.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, J. C., J. W. Cone, B. A. Williams, F. M. L. Debersaques, and Egbert A., Lantinga. 1996. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 64 (1):77–89. doi:10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01012-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härdle, W. 1990. Applied nonparametric regression. Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T. J., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1990. Generalized additive modelsVol. 43. Chapman and Hall
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, E., and M. Maechler. (2019), lokernlokern : Kernel Regression Smoothing with Local or Global Plug-in Bandwidth. R package version 1.1-8. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lokern
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. T., H. An, A. G. Bailey, D. P. M. Dittmer, and J. S Marron. 2019. Dr4pl: Dose response data analysis using the 4 parameter logistic (4pl) model.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, J. J., and R. Liu. 2009. Re-parameterization of five-parameter logistic function. Journal of Chemometrics 23 (5):248–253. doi:10.1002/cem.1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, J. W. 1988. Testing for lack of fit in nonlinear regression. Annals of Statistics 16 (2):733–740. doi:10.1214/aos/1176350831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, J. S., and T. Hayfield. (2019), np : Nonparametric Kernel Smoothing Methods for Mixed Data Types. R package version 0.60-9. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=np
   Google Scholar
• Ranke, J., J. Wöltjen, and S. Meinecke. 2018. Comparison of software tools for kinetic evaluation of chemical degradation data. Environmental Sciences Europe 30 (1). doi:10.1186/s12302-018-0145-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reynolds, A. R. 2010. Potential relevance of bell-shaped and u-shaped dose-responses for the therapeutic targeting of angiogenesis in cancer. Dose-Response 8 (3):253–284. doi:10.2203/dose-response.09-049.Reynolds.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, J. H., and G. A. Head. 1999. A five-parameter logistic equation for investigating asymmetry of curvature in baroreflex studies. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 277 (2):R441–454. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.2.R441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, C., F. Baty, J. C. Streibig, D. Gerhard, and Y. Xia. 2015. Dose-response analysis using R. PLoS One 10 (12):e0146021. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, C., S. M. Jensen, D.Gerhard, and J. C, Streibig. 2019. Dose-response analysis using R. Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman & Hall/CRC The R Series.
   Google Scholar
• Ritz, C., and T. Martinussen. 2011. Lack-of-fit tests for assessing mean structures for continuous dose-response data. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 18 (2):349–366. doi:10.1007/s10651-010-0136-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, C., and J. Streibig. 2005. Bioassay analysis using r. Journal of Statistical Software 12 (5):1–22. doi:10.18637/jss.v012.i05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satti, J. 2009. The emerging low-dose therapy for advanced cancers. Dose-Response 7 (3):208–220. doi:10.2203/dose-response.08-010.Satti.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand, M., C. Moler, and B. Ripley. (2019), KernSmooth : Functions for Kernel Smoothing. R package version 2.23-16. URL: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=KernSmooth
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S. Y., X. Li, Y. Xia, H. Liang. (2021), ‘A novel model checking approach for dose-response relationships’, Statistical Methods in Medical Research 30, 2119–2129.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., and A. Bowman. 1995. Non-parametric analysis of covariance. Biometrics 51 (3):920–931. doi:10.2307/2532993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar