A posteriori error estimates for mixed finite element approximation of nonlinear quadratic optimal control problems

References

• Arada , N. , Casas , E. and Troltzsch , F. 2002 . Error estimates for a semilinear elliptic control problem . Comput. Optim. Appl. , 23 : 201 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babuska , I. and Rheinboldt , W. C. 1978 . Error estimates for adaptive finite element computations . SIAM J. Numer. Anal. , 5 : 736 – 754 .
   Google Scholar
• Babuska , I. and Strouboulis , T. 2001 . The Finite Element Method and Its Reliability , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Becker , R. , Kapp , H. and Rannacher , R. 2000 . Adaptive finite element methods for optimal control of partial differential equations: Basic concept . SIAM J. Control Optim. , 39 : 113 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezzi , F. and Fortin , M. 1991 . Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods , Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Brunner , H. and Yan , N. 2003 . Finite element methods for optimal control problems governed by integral equations and integro-differential equations . Appl. Numer. Math. , 47 : 173 – 187 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen , C. 1997 . A posteriori error estimate for the mixed finite element method . Math. Comp. , 66 : 465 – 476 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. 2008 . Superconvergence of optimal control problems by rectangular mixed finite element methods . Math. Comp. , 77 : 1269 – 1291 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. 2008 . Superconvergence of quadratic optimal control problems by triangular mixed finite elements . Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. , 75 : 881 – 898 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. and Liu , W. 2002 . Posteriori error estimates for mixed finite elements of a quadratic optimal control problem . Recent Prog. Comput. Appl. PDEs , 2 : 123 – 134 .
   Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. and Liu , W. 2008 . A posteriori error estimates for mixed finite element solutions of convex optimal control problems . J. Comput. Appl. Math. , 211 : 76 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y. and Lu , Z. 2010 . Error estimates for parabolic optimal control problem by fully discrete mixed finite element methods . Finite Elem. Anal. Des. , 46 : 957 – 965 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement , P. 1975 . Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization . RAIRO Ser. Rougr Anal. Numer. , 2 : 77 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• Falk , F. S. 1973 . Approximation of a class of optimal control problems with order of convergence estimates . J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 44 : 28 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzburger , M. D. and Hou , S. L. 1996 . Finite dimensional approximation of a class of constrained nonlinear control problems . SIAM J. Control Optim. , 34 : 1001 – 1043 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunzburger , M. D. , Hou , S. L. and Svobodny , T. 1991 . Analysis and finite element approximation of optimal control problems for stationary Navier-stokes equations with Dirichlet controls . RAIRO Model. Math. Anal. Numer. , 25 : 711 – 748 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou , L. and Turner , J. C. 1995 . Analysis and finite element approximation of an optimal control problem in electrochemistry with current density controls . Numer. Math. , 71 : 289 – 315 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles , G. 2001 . Finite element approximation of parabolic time optimal control problems . SIAM J. Control Optim. , 20 : 414 – 427 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladyzhenskaya , O. A. and Uraltseva , N. 1968 . Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• R. Li and W. Liu, available at http://circus.math.pku.edu.cn/AFEPack.
   Google Scholar
• Li , R. , Liu , W. , Ma , H. and Tang , T. 2002 . Adaptive finite element approximation for distributed convex optimal control problems . SIAM J. Control Optim. , 41 : 1321 – 1349 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lions , J. L. 1971 . Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations , Berlin : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , W. and Barrett , J. W. 1993 . Error bounds for the finite element approximation of some degenerate quasilinear parabolic equations and variational inequalities . Adv. Comput. Math. , 1 : 223 – 239 .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , W. and Barrett , J. W. 1994 . Quasi-norm error bounds for the finite element approximation of some degenerate quasilinear elliptic equations and variational inequalities . Math. Model. Numer. Anal. , 28 : 725 – 744 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , W. and Yan , N. 2001 . A posteriori error estimates for optimal control problems governed by nonlinear elliptic equations . Adv. Comput. Math. , 15 : 285 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , W. and Yan , N. 2002 . A posteriori error estimates for distributed convex optimal control problems . Adv. Comput. Math. , 15 : 285 – 309 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , H. and Yan , N. 2004 . Global superconvergence for optimal control problems governed by Stokes equations . Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. , 3 : 283 – 302 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu , Z. and Chen , Y. 2009 . A posteriori error estimates of triangular mixed finite element methods for semilinear optimal control problems . Adv. Appl. Math. Mech. , 1 : 242 – 256 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliner , F. A. 1985 . Mixed finite element methods for quasilinear second-order elliptic problems . Math. Comp. , 44 : 303 – 320 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Raviart and J.M. Thomas, A Mixed Finite Element Method for 2nd Order Elliptic Problems, Mathematical Aspects of the Finite Element Method, Lecture Notes in Math. 606, Springer, Berlin, 1977, pp. 292–315.
   Google Scholar
• Xing , X. and Chen , Y. 2008 . L∞-error estimates for general optimal control problem by mixed finite element methods . Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model. , 5 : 441 – 456 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan , N. 2003 . A posteriori error estimators of gradient recovery type for FEM of a model optimal control problem . Adv. Comput. Math. , 19 : 323 – 336 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar