The General Content of Postinoculation Talk: Recalled Issue-Specific Conversations Following Inoculation Treatments

References

• Anderson, C. (1983). Imagination and expectation: The effect of imagining behavioral scripts on personal intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. R., & McGuire, W. J. (1965). Prior reassurance of group consensus as a factor in producing resistance to persuasion. Sociometry, 28, 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aronson, E., Turner, J. A., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(1), 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77, 281–311. doi:10.1080/03637751003758193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, P., & Parigi, P. (2004). Cloning headless frogs and other important matters: Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces, 83(2), 535–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. W., Bavelas, A., & Braden, M. (1961). An index to measure contingency of English sentences. Language and Speech, 4, 138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C. R. (1988). Planning, affect and social action generation. In L. Donohew H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition and affect (pp. 93–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C. M. Y., & Darke, P. R. (2006). The consumer as advocate: Self-relevance, culture, and word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 17, 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2009, Fall). Threat explication: What we know and don't yet know about a key component of inoculation theory. STAM Journal, 39, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed.) (pp. 220–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Ivanov, B. (2012). Untangling threat during inoculation theory-conferred resistance. Communication Reports, 25(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A., & Pfau, M. (2004). Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 29, pp. 97–145). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.1207/s15567419cy2901_4
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2009). Spreading inoculation: Inoculation, resistance to influence, and word-of-mouth communication. Communication Theory, 19(1), 9–28. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Giese, J. L., Spangenberg, E. R., & Crowley, A. E. (1996). Effects of product-specific word-of-mouth communication on product category involvement. Marketing Letters, 7(2), 187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. O. (1984). A cognitive approach to human communication: An action-assembly theory. Communication Monographs, 57, 289–306.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (2008). Imagined interaction theory: Mental representations of interpersonal communication. In L. A. Baxter & D. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication (pp. 77–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B. (2011). Designing inoculation messages for health communication campaigns. In Hyunyi Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design: Theory and practice (pp. 73–93). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Miller, C. H., Compton, J., Averbeck, J. M., Robertson, K. J., Sims, J. D., … Parker, J. L. (2012). Effects of post-inoculation talk on resistance to influence. Journal of Communication, 62, 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L., & Wadsworth, A. J. (1989). Content analysis. In P. Emmert & L. L. Baker (Eds.), Measurement of communication behavior (pp. 197–217). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, S. A., Fink, E. L., Armstrong, G. B., & Bauer, C. L. (1986). Message discrepancy and the persistence of attitude change: Implications of an information integration model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 507–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report. Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training, U. S. Naval Air Station, Memphis, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2005). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-K., & Pfau, M. (2007). Can inoculation work against the spiral of silence: A study of public opinion on the future of Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, A. A., & Janis, I. L. (1953). Resistance to ‘counterpropaganda’ produced by one-sided and two-sided ‘propaganda’ presentations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17(3), 311–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961a). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 1 (pp. 191–229). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., … Averbeck, J. A. (2013). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39, 127–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okamoto, D. G., & Smith-Lovin, L. (2001). Changing the subject: Gender, status, and the dynamics of topic change. American Sociological Review, 66, 852–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation's efficacy with young adults' risky behaviors: Can inoculation confer cross-protection over related but untreated issues? Health Communication, 27(3), 223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Banas, J., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., … Underhill, J. (2010). Role and impact of involvement and enhanced threat in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., An, C., Wittenberg, E. M., Ferguson, M., … Malyshev, Y. (2006). The conundrum of the timing of counterarguing effects in resistance: Strategies to boost the persistence of counterarguing output. Communication Quarterly, 54(2), 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., Wittenberg, E. M., An, C., Ferguson, M., … Malyshev, Y. (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility: Do they trigger distinct or overlapping processes of resistance? Human Communication Research, 30, 329–360. doi:10.1093/hcr/30.3.329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M., Sims, J., Gilchrist, E., … Richert, N. (2005). Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence. Communication Monographs, 72(4), 414–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K. H., & Shen, L. (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance. Communication Monographs, 70, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., Lane, L., … Banas, J. (2009). Nuances about the role and impact of affect in inoculation. Communication Monographs, 76(1), 73–98. doi:10.1080/03637750802378807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Koerner, A., Penaloza, L. J., … Yang, S. (1997). Nuances in inoculation: The role of inoculation approach, ego involvement, and message processing disposition in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 45, 461–481. doi:10.1080/01463379709370077
   Google Scholar
• Quereshi, M. Y., & Strauss, L. A. (1980). Immunization of a controverted belief through group discussion. Social Behavior and Personality, 8(2), 229–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., Esposito, J. L., & Gibney, L. (1988). Factors influencing rumor spreading: Replication and extension. Language and Communication, 8, 29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., & Yzer, M. C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 31, pp. 420–462). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., & Yzer, M. C. (2009). When (and why) interpersonal talk matters for campaigns. Communication Theory, 19(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, T. W., Poppe, P. R., & Merritt, A. P. (1996). Mass-media-generate interpersonal communication as sources of information about family planning. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 247–265.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Downing, J., Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Strength-related properties of attitudes: Measures, manipulations, and future directions. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 455–487). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., & Pfau, M. (2010). Arguing with emotion: A closer look at affect and the inoculation process. Communication Research Reports, 27(3), 217–229. doi:10.1080/08824091003737901
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. L. M. (2007). Rethinking the inoculation analogy: Effects on subjects with differing preexisting attitudes. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 357–378. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar