The Influence of Biological Sex on Perceived Aggressive Communication in Debater–Judge Conflicts in Parliamentary Debate

References

• Allen, M., Trejo, M., Bartanen, M., Schroeder, A. & Ulrich, T. (2004). Diversity in United States forensics: A report on research conducted for the American Forensic Association. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40, 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., Staley, B. & Schultz, C. C. (1987). Training in argumentativeness: New hope for nonassertive women. Women's Studies in Communication, 10, 58–66. doi:10.1080/07491409.1987.11089706
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., Clabaugh, S., Clark, R., Kosovski, M., Daar, R., Hefner, V. & Suri, R. (2007). Teasing among college men and women. Communication Studies, 58, 157–172. doi:10.1080/10510970701341105
   Google Scholar
• Billings, A. C. (1999). He said, she said: An analysis of judging differences between the sexes. The Forensic, 84, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, J. (2000). Advancing the discipline: The role of forensics in the communication field. The Forensic, 86, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bruschke, J. & Johnson, A. (1994). An analysis of differences in success rates of male and female debaters. Argumentation and Advocacy, 30, 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, M., Dillard, J. & Doran, N. E. (1983). Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violations of expectations by males and females. Human Communication Research, 10, 283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, G. H., Tucker, M., Li, G., Zhou, X. & Hwang, S. (2011). Exploratory analysis of verbal aggression in romantic relationships among unmarried men and women: Predictive patterns by gender and race. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 28, 1005–1023. doi:10.1177/0265407510397984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchirillo, V. & Roberto, A. (2008, November). The influence of target race and gender on teasing topics. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchirillo, V. & Roberto, A. (2012). Teasing by the numbers: How race and gender influence teasing behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 29, 87–98. doi:10.1080/08824096.2012.667776
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, K. R. (1993). The effects of debate participation on argumentativeness and verbal aggression. Communication Education, 42, 206–214. doi:10.1080/03634529309378928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert, K. R. & Biggers, T. (1985). Why should we support debate? Journal of the American Forensics Association, 21, 237–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cupach, W. R., Canary, D. J. & Spitzberg, B. H. (2010). Competence in interpersonal conflict. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darus, H. J. (1994). Argumentativeness in the workplace: A trait by situation study. Communication Research Reports, 11, 99–106. doi:10.1080/08824099409359945
   Google Scholar
• De Conti, M. (2014). The impact of competitive debate on managing the conflict communication strategies of Italian students. Argumentation & Advocacy, 51, 123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Dhillon, K. & Larson, A. (2011). Biological sex as a predictor of competitive success in intercollegiate forensics. National Forensic Journal, 29, 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H. & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedley, S. A. & Manchester, B. B. (1985). An analysis of male/female participation at select national championships. National Forensic Journal, 3, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstreet, R., Joeckel, K., Martin, J. & Piercy, K. (1998). The gender-based experiences of women in intercollegiate forensics. The Forensic, 83, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J. (1997). Justifying decisions: Good ballots give good reasons. Southern Journal of Forensics, 2, 87–105.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, K. (2009). Gender and competitive equity: The 2007 and 2008 National Parliamentary Debate Association national tournaments. The Forensic, 94, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hensley, W. E. & Strother, D. B. (1968). Success in debate. Speech Teacher, 17, 233–235.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D. V. & Brussee, C. (1996). Improving the pedagogical value of debate: A call for oral critiques. National Forensic Journal, 14, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1981). Trait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 265–272. doi:10.1080/10510978109368105
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1982). The argumentative student in the speech communication classroom: An investigation and implications. Communication Education, 31, 141–148. doi:10.1080/03634528209384671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1985). Inducing women to be more argumentative: Source credibility effects. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 13, 33–44. doi:10.1080/00909888509388419
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1987). Aggressiveness. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 157–192). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1988). Arguing constructively. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. (1989). Response to high argumentatives: Message and sex differences. Southern Communication Journal, 54, 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Myers, S. A. & Buerkel, R. A. (1994). Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 73–84. doi:10.1080/10570319409374488
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. & Rancer, A. S. (1982). A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research. Communication Yearbook, 19, 319–351.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Rancer, A. S. & Jordan, F. F. (1996). Affirming and nonaffirming style, dyad sex, and the perception of argumentation and verbal aggression in an interpersonal dispute. Human Communication Research, 22, 315–334. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Sabourin, T. C., Rudd, J. E. & Shannon, E. A. (1990). Verbal aggression in violent and nonviolent marital disputes. Communication Quarterly, 38, 361–371. doi:10.1080/01463379009369773
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A., Wall, C. H., Leap, C. J. & Danielson, K. (1984). Verbal aggression as a function of the receiver's argumentativeness. Communication Research Reports, 1, 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Infante, D. A. & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61–69. doi:10.1080/03637758609376126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., Averbeck, J. M., Kelley, K. M. & Liu, S. (2011). When serial arguments predict harm: Examining the influences of argument function, topic of the argument, perceived resolvability, and argumentativeness. Argumentation and Advocacy, 47, 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. & Treadaway, G. (2000). A preliminary study of the relationships between support, self-esteem, and perceptions of sexual harassment in intercollegiate debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 21, 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan-Jackson, F. F., Lin, Y., Rancer, A. S. & Infante, D. A. (2008). Perceptions of males and females’ use of aggressive affirming and nonaffirming messages in an interpersonal dispute: You've come a long way baby? Western Journal of Communication, 72, 239–258. doi:10.1080/10570310802210122
   Google Scholar
• Kinney, T. A., Smith, B. A. & Donzella, B. (2001). The influence of sex, gender, self-discrepancies, and self-awareness on anger and verbal aggressiveness among U.S. college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 245–275. doi:10.1080/00224540109600550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosberg, R. L. & Rancer, A. S. (1998). Enhancing argumentativeness and argumentative behavior: The influence of gender and training. In L. Longmire & L. Merrill (Eds.), Untying the tongue: Gender, power, and the word (pp. 251–265). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., Burant, P. A. & Weber, K. (1997). Verbal aggression in sibling relationships. Communication Quarterly, 45, 304–317. doi:10.1080/01463379709370067
   Google Scholar
• Matz, S. & Bruschke, J. (2006). Gender inequity in debate, legal and business professions. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 27, 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, M. A. (2001). Women in parliamentary debate: An examination of women's performance at the National Parliamentary Debate Association's National Tournament. Parliamentary Debate, 8, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A., Brann, M. & Martin, M. M. (2013). Identifying the content and topics of instructor use of verbally aggressive messages. Communication Research Reports, 30, 252–258. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.806260
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. & Johnson, A. D. (2003). Verbal aggression and liking in interpersonal relationships. Communication Research Reports, 20, 90–96. doi:10.1080/08824090309388803
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S. A. & Knox, R. L. (1999). Verbal aggression in the college classroom: Perceived instructor use and student affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47, 33–45. doi:10.1080/01463379909370122
   Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M. & Rancer, A. S. (1994). The influence of sex on self-perceptions and social stereotyping of aggressive communication predispositions. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 283–307. doi:10.1080/10570319409374501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., Steele, J., Catalani, A. & Simpson, N. (2012). Conceptualization and test of an aggression competence model. Communication Research Reports, 29, 12–25. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.639909
   Google Scholar
• Onyekwere, E. O., Rubin, R. B. & Infante, D. A. (1991). Interpersonal perception and communication satisfaction as a function of argumentativeness and ego-involvement. Communication Quarterly, 39, 35–47. doi:10.1080/01463379109369781
   Google Scholar
• Pettus, A. B. & Danielson, M. A. (1994). Coaching intercollegiate debate and raising a family: An analysis of perspectives from women in the trenches. National Forensic Journal, 11, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Rancer, A. S. & Avtgis, T. A. (2006). Argumentative and aggressive communication: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rancer, A. S. & Baukus, R. A. (1987). Discriminating males and females on belief structures about arguing. In L. B. Nadler M. K. Madler & W. R. Todd-Mancillas (Eds.), Advances in gender and communication research (pp. 155–173). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Rancer, A. S. & Dierks-Stewart, K. J. (1985). The influence of sex and sex-role orientation on trait argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 69–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancer, A. S., Whitecap, V. G., Kosberg, R. L. & Avtgis, T. A. (1997). Testing the efficacy of a communication training program to increase argumentativeness and argumentative behavior in adolescents. Communication Education, 46, 273–286. doi:10.1080/03634529709379101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, K. (1992). Teacher demographic characteristics and levels of teacher argumentativeness. Communication Research Reports, 9, 65–71. doi:10.1080/08824099209359898
   Google Scholar
• Rogan, R. G. & La France, B. H. (2003). An examination of the relationship between verbal aggressiveness, conflict management strategies, and conflict interaction goals. Communication Quarterly, 51, 458–469. doi:10.1080/01463370309370167
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J. E. (1997). A community of unequals: An analysis of dominant and subdominant culturally linked perceptions of participation and success within intercollegiate competitive debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 18, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-DuPre, R. L. (2006). Women in debate: From virtual to material. Contemporary Argumentation & Debate, 27, 106–120.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. W. (1990). To disclose or not to disclose? Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 11, 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfatt, T. M. (1990). College debate a quarter century later. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 11, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Stepp, P. (2001). Sexual harassment in communication extra-curricular activities: Intercollegiate debate and individual events. Communication Education, 50, 34–50. doi:10.1080/03634520109379230
   Google Scholar
• Stepp, P., Simerly, G. & Logue, B. (1994). Sexual harassment in CEDA debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Stone-Watt, S. (2012). Authentic assessment in debate: An argument for using ballots to foster talent-development and promote authentic learning. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 33, 75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, C. L. (2008, November). Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and competitive relational satisfaction in the parliamentary debate dyad. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, C. L. & Vourvoulias, C. (2006). Argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and relational satisfaction in the parliamentary debate dyad. Parliamentary Debate, 11, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Szwapa, C. A. (1994). Sexual harassment and gender discrimination in NDT debate. Argumentation and Advocacy, 31, 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, W. (1983). The influence of the judge on the debate round. In D. Zarefsky M. O. Sillars & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Argument in transition: Proceedings of the third summer conference on argumentation (pp. 938–950). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. E. (1997). Gender as a predictor of competitive success in extemporaneous speaking. National Forensic Journal, 15, 21–38.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, M. G. & Eskilson, A. (1985). Speech style, gender stereotypes, and corporate success: What if women talk more like men? Sex Roles, 12, 993–1007. doi:10.1007/BF00288100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. M. & Hobbs, J. (1997). A feminist critique of intercollegiate debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 18, 57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Worthen, T. & Pack, G. (1993, November). The case of the missing female debater revisited: Judge and debater perceptions of team effectiveness based on gender. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar