Affordances as Material Communication: How the Spatial Environment Communicates to Organize Cyclists in Copenhagen, Denmark

References

• Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2010). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83–104. doi:10.1177/1350508410376256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2011). What goes down must come up: Communication as incarnation and transcension. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(2), 194–200. doi:10.1080/14791420.2011.567810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Cooren, F. (2011). Communication as incarnation. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 8(2), 186–187. doi:10.1080/14791420.2011.567800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummans, B. H. J. M., Cooren, F., Robichaud, D., & Taylor, J. R. (2014). Approaches to the communicative constitution of organizations. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 173–194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2012). Mixing or adding methods?: An exploration and critique. In N. K. Denzin & M. D. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and the politics of advocacy (pp. 123–144). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colville-Andersen, M. (2014). The green waves of Copenhagen. Retrieved from http://www.copenhagenize.com/2014/08/the-green-waves-of-copenhagen.html
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2006). The organizational world as a plenum of agencies. In F. Cooren, J. R. Taylor, & E. J. Van Every (Eds.), Communication as organizing: Empirical and theoretical explorations in the dynamic of text and conversation (pp. 81–100). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2010). Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62, 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Brummans, B. H. J. M., & Charrieras, D. (2008). The coproduction of organizational presence: A study of Médecins Sans Frontières in action. Human Relations, 61(10), 1339–1370. doi:10.1177/0018726708095707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Fox, S., Robichaud, D., & Talih, N. (2005). Arguments for a plurified view of the social world: Spacing and timing as hybrid achievements. Time & Society, 14(2/3), 265–282. doi:10.1177/0961463X05055138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Kuhn, T. R., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. doi:10.1177/0170840611410836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denmark. (2016). Copenhageners love their bikes. Retrieved from http://denmark.dk/en/green-living/bicycle-culture/copenhageners-love-their-bikes
   Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. doi:10.1111/joms.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garbarini, F., & Adenzato, M. (2004). At the root of embodied cognition: Cognitive science meets neurophysiology. Brain and Cognition, 56(1), 100–106. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology (pp. 79–84). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. London, UK: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Københavs Kommune. (2017). Cykelstrategien 2011-2025. Retrieved from http://kk.sites.itera.dk/apps/kk_pub2/?mode=detalje&id=818
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A., & Burk, N. R. (2016). Accomplishing authority in collaborative work. Western Journal of Communication, 80(4), 393–413. doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1159728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krag, T. (2002). Urban cycling in Denmark. In H. McClintock (Ed.), Planning for cycling: Principles, practice and solutions for urban planners (pp. 223–236). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Beijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2009a). Crossing the implementation line: Exploring the relationship between technology development and use in organizations. Communication Theory, 19(3), 278–310. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2009b). Why do people reject new technologies and stymie organizational changes of which they are in favor? Exploring misalignments between social interactions and materiality. Human Communication Research, 35(3), 407–441. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, W. C. (2011). Materiality as organizational communication: Technology, intention, and delegation in the production of meaning. In T. R. Kuhn (Ed.), Matters of communication: Political, cultural, and technological challenges to communication theorizing (pp. 101–124). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, S. (2011). In the plex: How Google thinks, works, and shapes our lives. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T., & Taylor, B. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433–474. doi:10.1080/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, E., & Rosenberg, J. (2014). How Google works. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Snizek, B., Nielsen, T. A. S., & Skov-Petersen, H. (2013). Mapping bicyclists’ experiences in Copenhagen. Journal of Transport Geography, 30, 227–233. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Topinka, R. J. (2016). Race, circulation, and the city: The case of the Chicago city sticker controversy. Western Journal of Communication, 80(2), 163–184. doi:10.1080/10570314.2016.1139173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. In C. T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 36 (pp. 143–189). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2129853
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 31(3), 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, E. D., & Kisselburgh, L. G. (2015). Collective action without organization: The material constitution of bike commuters as collective. Organization Studies, 36(5), 573–592. doi:10.1177/0170840614556916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhoit, E. D., & Kisselburgh, L. G. (2016). Through the eyes of the participant: Making connections between researcher and subject with participant viewpoint ethnography. Field Methods, 28(2), 208–226. doi:10.1177/1525822X15601950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar