Making Sense of the People’s Climate March: Towards an Aesthetic Approach to the Rhetoric of Social Protest

References

• Adorno, T. W. (2001). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture ( J. N. Bernstein (Ed.)). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1972)
   Google Scholar
• Blair, C. (2001). Reflections on criticism and bodies: Parables from public places. Western Journal of Communication, 65(3), 271–294. doi:10.1080/10570310109374706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boutilier, J. (2014, September 23). Why the People’s Climate March actually was awesome. CommonDreams. Retrieved from https://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/09/23/why-peoples-climate-march-actually-was-awesome
   Google Scholar
• Brecht, B. (1992). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (Vol. 13) ( J. Willett, Ed.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1957).
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. The Drama Review, 46(2), 145–156. doi:10.1162/105420402320980550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, D. (2014, September 29). Vermont at the People’s Climate March. Brattleboro Reformer. Accessed via Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 19(2), 125–151. doi:10.1080/07393180216559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck-Wanzer, D. (2006). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lords Organization’s garbage offensive. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(2), 174–201. doi:10.1080/00335630600816920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2011). Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(3), 257–282. doi:10.1080/00335630.2011.585167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Senda-Cook, S., & Cozen, B. (2014). Not just a place to park your car: PARK(ing) as spatial argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 50(3), 121–140. doi:10.1080/00028533.2014.11821814
   Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Sprain, L., & Peterson, T. R. (2008). The imperative of praxis-based environmental communication research: Suggestions from the Step It Up 2007 national research project. Environmental Communication, 2(2), 237–245. doi:10.1080/17524030802141794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, D., Sprain, L. M., & Peterson, T. R. (2009). Social movement to address climate change: Local steps for global action. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2010). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the Earth. New York, NY: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage. (Original work published 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, R. W., & Cozen, B. (2015). Passé media: Communication and transportation on commuter and computer buses. Communication Theory, 25, 290–309. doi:10.1111/comt.12056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, A. (2014, September 22). “This is history”: People’s Climate March organizer Bill McKibben on 400,000-strong turnout. Democracy Now! Retrieved from http://www.democracynow.org/2014/9/22/this_is_history_peoples_climate_march
   Google Scholar
• Greene, R. W. (1998). The aesthetic turn and the rhetorical perspective on argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 35(1), 19–29. doi:10.1080/00028533.1998.11951614
   Google Scholar
• Gregg, R. B. (1971). The ego-function of the rhetoric of protest. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 4(2), 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, C. (2014, August 31). The last gasp of climate change liberals. truthdig: Drilling beneath the headlines. Retrieved from https://www.truthdig.com/articles/the-last-gasp-of-climate-change-liberals/
   Google Scholar
• Hertsgaard, M. (2014a, September 16). How to define success for the People’s Climate March. The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/how-define-success-peoples-climate-march/
   Google Scholar
• Hertsgaard, M. (2014b, September 21). The People’s Climate March was huge, but will it change everything? The Nation. Retrieved from https://www.thenation.com/article/peoples-climate-march-was-huge-will-it-change-everything/
   Google Scholar
• Hess, A. (2011). Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of rhetoric. Communication Studies, 62(2), 127–152. doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.529750
   Google Scholar
• Hinderliter, B., Kaizen, W., Maimon, V., Mansoor, J., & McCormick, S. (Eds.). (2009). Communities of sense: Rethinking aesthetics and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (Eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2014, September 21). Hundreds of thousands attend climate march. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/thousands-attend-peoples-climate-march-in-new-york-city-1411324590
   Google Scholar
• Khin, I. (2014, October 9). The People’s Climate March: The initial steps in the right direction. Graphite. Retrieved from https://graphitepublications.com/the-peoples-climate-march-the-initial-steps-in-the-right-direction-2/
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R. A. (1983). Enacting red power: The consummatory function in native American protest rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69(2), 127–142. doi:10.1080/00335638309383642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, E. (2016). Visualizing homeland: Remembering 9/11 and the production of the surveilling flâneur. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(6), 536–547. doi:10.1177/1532708616655823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. (2014). Wrong, disagreement, subjectification. In J. P. Deranty (Ed.), Jacques Rancière: Key concepts (pp. 69–79). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McHendry, G. F. Jr, Middleton, M. K., Endres, D., Senda-Cook, S., & O’Byrne, M. (2014). Rhetorical critic(ism)’s body: Affect and fieldwork on a plane of immanence. Southern Communication Journal, 79(4), 293–310. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2014.906643
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. E. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communications Monographs, 56(2), 91–111. doi:10.1080/03637758909390253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKibben, B. (2014, May 21). A call to arms: An invitation to demand action on climate change. Rolling Stone Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/a-call-to-arms-an-invitation-to-demand-action-on-climate-change-20140521
   Google Scholar
• McKibben, B., & Hedges, C. (2014, September 8). The climate march: Will it be a call to arms for the earth, or are more radical actions needed? Alternet. Retrieved from https://www.alternet.org/activism/climate-march-will-it-be-call-arms-earth-or-are-more-radical-actions-needed
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K. (2014). Housing, not handcuffs: Homeless misrecognition and “SafeGround Sacramento’s” homeless activism. Communication, Culture & Critique, 7(3), 320–337. doi:10.1111/cccr.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Hess, A., Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2015). Participatory critical rhetoric: Theoretical and methodological foundations for studying rhetoric in situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, M. K., Senda-Cook, S., & Endres, D. (2011). Articulating rhetorical field methods: Challenges and tensions. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 386–406. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.586969
   Google Scholar
• Mirzoeff, N. (2011). The right to look: A counterhistory of visuality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, K. A., & Sloop, J. M. (1992). Commitment to telos—A sustained critical rhetoric. Communications Monographs, 59(1), 48–60. doi:10.1080/03637759209376248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2014, September 8). Everything you need to know to attend the biggest climate march in history. Climate Progress. Retrieved from https://thinkprogress.org/everything-you-need-to-know-to-attend-the-biggest-climate-march-in-history-bf7bb6b461f3/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, K. R. (1996). The spaces of public dissension: Reconsidering the public sphere. Communications Monographs, 63(3), 231–248. doi:10.1080/03637759609376391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plus Media Solutions. (2014, October 15). From minneapple to the big apple: A teen’s perspective on the People’s Climate March. US Official News. Accessed via Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2006). The politics of aesthetics (G. Rockhill, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 2000)
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Senda-Cook, S. (2012). Rugged practices: Embodying authenticity in outdoor recreation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98(2), 129–152. doi:10.1080/00335630.2012.663500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senda-Cook, S. (2013). Materializing tensions: How maps and trails mediate nature. Environmental Communication, 7(3), 355–371. doi:10.1080/17524032.2013.792854
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of ‘public’ and ‘private’ life. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(3), 107–125. doi:10.1177/02632764030203007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoneman, E. (2011). Appropriate indecorum rhetoric and aesthetics in the political theory of Jacques Rancière. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 44(2), 129–149. doi:10.1353/par.2011.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strine, M. S. (1998). Articulating performance/performativity: Disciplinary tasks and the contingencies of practice. In J. Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the helm for the twenty-first century (pp. 312–317). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tanke, J. J. (2011). Jacques Rancière: An introduction: Philosophy, politics, aesthetics. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Utphall, N. (2014, September 28). Your views. Wisconsin State Journal. Accessed via Lexis Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Vicaro, M. P. (2015). Hunger for voice: Transformative argumentation in the 2005 Guantanamo Bay hunger strike. Argumentation and Advocacy, 51(3), 171–184. doi:10.1080/00028533.2015.11821848
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, A. S. (2014, September 23). NYPD adopts less confrontational posture at climate protests. Gotham Gazette. Retrieved from http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/opinion/5340-nypd-adopts-less-confrontational-posture-climate-protests-vitale
   Google Scholar
• Vivian, B. (1999). The veil and the visible. Western Journal of Communication, 63(2), 115–139. doi:10.1080/10570319909374633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. (1989). A theory of argumentation. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willihnganz, S., Hart, J., & Willard, C. A. (1993). Valuing dissensus, message design logic, and competing organizational demands. In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twelfth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Windt, T. O.Jr. (1972). The diatribe: Last resort for protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/00335637209383096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar