Ong’s Ramus: Origins and Implications of the Decline of Agonistic Practice

References

• Backer, D. I. (2017). Radical discussions: Agonistic democratic education. Philosophy of Education Yearbook, 73, 127–143. doi:10.47925/73.127
   Google Scholar
• Education in Europe: Medieval Education. (n.d.) In science encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://science.jrank.org/pages/9077/Education-in-Europe-Medieval-Education.html
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England.
   Google Scholar
• Ellul, J. (1985). The humiliation of the word. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company: Grand Rapids, Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. J., & Soukup, P. A. (Eds.). (2002). An Ong reader: Challenges for further inquiry. Hampton Press, Inc: New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. S. (1993). The Diffusion of Writings of Petrus Ramus in Central Europe, c. 1570–c. 1630. Renaissance Quartlery, 46(1), 98–152. doi:10.2307/3039149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravelle, S. S. (1988). The Latin-vernacular question and humanist theory of language and culture. Journal of the History of Ideas, 49(3), 367–386. doi:10.2307/2709483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, I. M. (2009). Humanism and Protestantism in early modern English education. Routledge. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.stvincent.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=292497&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. (2003). Instruction in the making: Peter Ramus and the beginnings of modern schooling. Presented at American Education Research Association Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Jarc, J. (2014). Mobiliteracy: Applying Ong’s psychodynamic characteristics to users of mobile communication technology. Communication Research Trends, 33(1), 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Khushf, G. (1995). Grammacentrism and the transformation of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 28(1), 30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobe, D. (n.d.). Luther and science. LeaderU Archive. Retrieved from, http://www.leaderu.com/science/kobe.html
   Google Scholar
• Lungstrum, J., & Sauer, E. (1997). Agonistics: Arenas of creative contest. State University of New York Press: Albany, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Nauert, C. G. (1998). Humanism as Method. Roots of Conflict with the Scholastics.The Sixteenth Century Journal, 29(2), 427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauert, C. G. (1998). Humanism as method: Roots of conflict with the scholastics. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 29(2), 427–438. doi:10.2307/2544524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naughton, M. (2017). Luther’s media phenomenon. Published in Harvard Divinity School News & Events, 23 March 2016. Republished in Media Development February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1953). Peter Ramus and the naming of methodism: Medieval science through ramist homiletic. Journal of the History of Ideas, 14(2), 235–248. doi:10.2307/2707473
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1954). Fouquelin's French Rhetoric and the Ramist Vernacular Tradition. Studies in philology, 51(2), 127–142.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1958). Ramus, method and the decay of dialogue. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1959). Latin Language Study as a Renaissance Puberty Rite. Studies in philology, 56, 103–124.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1961). Ramist method and commercial mind. Studies in the Renaissance, 8, 155–172. doi:10.2307/2856994
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1962a). Educationists and the tradition of learning. In W. J. Ong (Ed.), The barbarian within (pp. 149–163). The MacMillan Company: New York, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1967). The presence of the word. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1974). Agonistic structures in academia: Past to present. Daedalus, 103(4), 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1975). The writer’s audience is always a fiction. PMLA, 90(1), 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1977). Interfaces of the Word, Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1979). Literacy and orality in our times. Profession, 1–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25595303
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1982a). The agonistic base of scientifically abstract thought: Issues in fighting for life: Contest, sexuality and consciousness. In T. J. Farrell & P. J. Soukup (Eds.), An Ong reader: Challenges for further inquiry (pp. 20–227). Hampton Press, Inc: Westhampton Beach, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (1982b). Orality and literacy. Routledge: London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, W. J. (2002). Ramus: Rhetoric and the PRE-NEWTONIAN Mind. In T. J. Farrell & P. J. Soukup (Eds.), An Ong reader: Challenges for further inquiry (pp. 209–227). Hampton Press, Inc: Westhampton Beach, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1968). Rhetoric and philosophy. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Perreiah, A. (1982). Humanist critiques of scholastic dialectic. Sixteenth Century Journal, 13(3), 3–22. doi:10.2307/2539602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly. Vintage Books: Vancouver, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Strate, L. (2013, January 12). The problem in the system. Time Passing, Retrieved from http://lancestrate.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-problem-in-system.html
   Google Scholar
• Walton, C. (1970). Ramus and the art of judgment. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 3(3), 152–164.
   Google Scholar