Asexuality, Affect Aliens, and Digital Affect Cultures: Relationality with the Happy Objects of Sexual and Romantic Relationships

References

• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, S. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K., & Adams, T. (2016). Family bullies. Journal of Family Communication, 16(1), 51–63. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1111217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogaert, A. (2015). Asexuality: What it is and why it matters. The Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 362–379. doi:10.1080/00224499.2015.1015713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brotto, L., & Yule, A. (2017). Asexuality: Sexual orientation, paraphilia, sexual dysfunction, or none of the above? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 619–627. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0802-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M., & Izuma, K. (2018). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward sex and romance in asexuals. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(8), 962–974. doi:10.1080/00224499.2017.1303438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerankowski, K. J., & Milks, M., Eds. (2014). Asexualities: Feminist and queer perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chasin, C. (2015). Making sense in and of the asexual community: Navigating relationships and Identities in a context of resistance. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 167–180. doi:10.1002/casp.2203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheverette, R. (2013). Outing heteronormativity in interpersonal and family communication: Feminist applications of queer theory “beyond the sexy streets” Communication Theory, 23(2), 170–190. doi:10.1111/comt.12009
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., Mcdonnell, L., & Scott, S. (2016). Negotiating the boundaries of intimacy: The personal lives of asexual people. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 349–365. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, M., Scott, S., & Mcdonnell, L. (2018). ‘“Asexual” isn’t who I am’: The politics of asexuality. Sociological Research Online, 23(2), 374–391. doi:10.1177/1360780418757540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döveling, K., Harju, A., & Sommer, D. (2018). From mediatized emotion to digital affect cultures: New technologies and global flows of emotion. Social Media Society, 4(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, A., Eklund, A., Brewster, M., Walker, A., & Candon, E. (2019). Personal agency disavowed: Identity construction in asexual women of color. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 6(2), 127-137.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Ralston, R. (2016). Queer identity online: Informal learning and teaching experiences of LGBTQ individuals on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 635–642. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1949). An outline of psycho-analysis. J. Strachey Trans Original work published 1940 New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1959). Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. J. Strachey Trans Original work published 1921 New York, NY: W.W. North & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, K. (2017). “And now I’m just different, but there’s nothing actually wrong with me”: Asexual marginalization and resistance. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(8), 991–1013. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1236590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, K. (2018). Gendering asexuality and asexualizing gender: A qualitative study exploring the intersections between gender and asexuality. Sexualities, 22(7-8), 1197-1216.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, B., & Chen, Y. (2019). Developing a method of critical thematic analysis for qualitative communication inquiry. Howard Journal of Communications, 30(1), 92–106. doi:10.1080/10646175.2018.1439423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T., & Taylor, B. C. (2019). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeela, P., & Murphy, A. (2015). Freedom, invisibility, and community: A qualitative study of self-Identification with asexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 799–812. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0458-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, J. (2015). Paradoxes of (im)purity: Affirming heteronormativity and queering heterosexuality in family discourses of purity pledges. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(1), 99–117. doi:10.1080/07491409.2014.954687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollet, A. L., & Lackman, B. (2018). Asexual borderlands: Asexual collegians’ reflections on inclusion under the LGBTQ umbrella. Journal of College Student Development, 59(5), 623–628. doi:10.1353/csd.2018.0058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J., & Manning, J. (2019). What counts as critical interpersonal and family communication research? A review of an emerging field of inquiry. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(1), 40–57. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1570825
   Google Scholar
• Owen, W. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryzybylo, E. (2011). Crisis and safety: The asexual in sexusociety. Sexualities, 14(4), 444–461. doi:10.1177/1363460711406461
   Google Scholar
• Pryzybylo, E. (2019). Asexual erotics: Intimate readings of compulsory sexuality. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, B. (2015). “Where I can be myself … where I can speak my mind”: Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529. doi:10.1177/1461444814530095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, N., Low, K., & Query, K. (2016). A qualitative exploration of the “coming out” process for asexual individuals. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(3), 751–760. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0561-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simecek, K. (2017). Affect theory. The Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory, 25(1), 418–435. doi:10.1093/ywcct/mbx022
   Google Scholar
• Suter, E. A. (2018). The promise of contrapuntal and intersectional methods for advancing critical interpersonal and family communication research. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 123–139. doi:10.1080/03637751.2017.1375131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, L. H. (2019). Introduction to the special issue: Increasing space for families on the margin. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 171–176. doi:10.1080/15267431.2019.1632314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houdenhove, E., Gijs, L., T’sjoen, G., & Enzlin, P. (2015). Stories about asexuality: A qualitative study in asexual women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(3), 262–281. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2014.889053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vares, T. (2018). ‘My [asexuality] is playing hell with my dating life’: Romantic identified asexuals negotiate the dating game. Sexualities, 21(4), 520–536. doi:10.1177/1363460717716400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willes, K., Jagiello, K., Allen, M., & Motel, L. (2019). No matter what: A qualitative analysis of how LGBTQ families and allies define family through an interactive art project. Journal of Family Communication, 19(3), 277–289. doi:10.1080/15267431.2019.1632865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar