How Students Respond to Critical Feedback from Teaching Assistants: The Effect of Instructor and Feedback Characteristics on Perceptions of Credibility, Efficacy, Affect, and Self-Esteem

References

• Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2010). Instructor feedback: How much do students really want? Journal of Marketing Education, 32(2), 172–181. doi:10.1177/0273475309360159
   Google Scholar
• Adebayo, C. T., & Allen, M. (2020). The experience of international teaching assistants in the U.S. classroom: A qualitative study. Journal of International Students, 10(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v10i1.1086
   Google Scholar
• Atmes, P., & Eslami, Z. R. (2012). An analysis of non-native English-speaking graduate teaching assistants’ online journal entries. Language and Education, 26(6), 537–552. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.669766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Reviews, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., & Fink, D. S. (1993). Student perceptions of teaching assistants (TAs). Basic Communication Course Annual, 5(1), 71–100. Retrieved from http://ecommons.udayton.edu/bcca/vol5/iss1/8
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C. (2002). Teacher praise and feedback and students’ perceptions of the classroom experience. Educational Psychology, 22(1), 5–16. doi:10.1080/01443410120101215
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, Y., Kim, M., Svinicki, M. D., & Decker, M. L. (2011). Exploring teaching concerns and characteristics of graduate teaching assistants. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 267–279. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.524920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cionea, I. A. (2013). A dual perspective on the management of relational transgressions in romantic relationships (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3587414)
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Hayfield, N. (2015). Thematic analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 222–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, R. J., Gupta, S., & Krispin, J. (2018). Students’ perceptions of instructor interaction, feedback, and course effectiveness in a large class environment. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 20. Retrieved from https://www.aabri.com/jip.html
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. E., Anderson, L. B., & Wolvin, A. D. (2017). Understanding instructor immediacy, credibility, and facework strategies through a qualitative analysis of written instructor feedback. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 18(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/17459435.2016.1247113
   Google Scholar
• Hadden, A. A., & Frisby, B. N. (2019). Face threat mitigation in feedback: An examination of student feedback, anxiety, self-efficacy, and perceived emotional support. Communication Quarterly, 67(1), 60–75. doi:10.1080/01463373.2018.1531043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (1999, August 2). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture. University of Auckland. Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/education/about/research/documents/influences-on-student-learning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349–371. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies, R., De, P. I. E., & Judge, T. (2007). Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback and the role of self‐esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 590–609. doi:10.1108/02683940710778459
   Google Scholar
• Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Lindemann, S. (2015). Mitigating U.S. undergraduates’ attitudes toward international teaching assistants. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 681–706. doi:10.1002/tesq.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J. (2001). Teacher communication activities relevant to student motivation: Classroom facework and instructional communication competence. Communication Education, 50(3), 256–273. doi:10.1080/03634520109379252
   Google Scholar
• Kerssen-Griep, J., & Terry, C. L. (2016). Communicating instructional feedback: Definitions, explanations, principles, and questions. In P. L. Witt (Ed.), Communication and learning (pp. 287–321). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. E., Schrodt, P., & Weisel, J. J. (2009). The instructional feedback orientation scale: Conceptualizing and validating a new measure for assessing perceptions of instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58(2), 235–261. doi:10.1080/03634520802515705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. E., & Tucker King, C. S. (2020). Instructor perceptions of feedback and the best practices: A pilot study. American Communication Journal, 22(1), 1–10. Retrieved from https://www.ac-journal.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211–232. doi:10.3102/00346543047002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524–536. doi:10.1017/S0261444819000247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., Yu, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Hong Kong secondary students’ motivation in EFL writing: A survey study. TESOL Quarterly, 52(1), 176–187. doi:10.1002/tesq.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Mazer, J. P., & Ju, R. (2011). Resolving international teaching assistant language inadequacy through dialogue: Challenges and opportunities for clarity and credibility. Communication Education, 60(4), 461–478. doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.565352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, B. (2018). Education in the United States of America. Word Education News + Reviews. Retrieved from https://wenr.wes.org/2018/06/education-in-the-united-states-of-america
   Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., Kurdziel, J. P., Roehrig, G. H., & Turner, J. (2004). Growing a garden without water: Graduate teaching assistants in introductory science laboratories at a doctoral/research university. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 211–233. doi:10.1002/tea.20004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machette, A. T. (2020, May). The dialectical tensions of graduate teaching assistants. [Virtual conference presentation]. Annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Gold Coast, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Machette, A. T. (2021). The dialectical tensions of graduate teaching assistants. The Texas Speech Communication Journal, 45, 13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Manohar, U., & Appiah, O. (2016). Perspective taking to improve attitudes towards international teaching assistants: The role of national identification and prior attitudes. Communication Education, 65(2), 149–163. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1081956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaka, V. (2009). The niche of graduate teaching assistants (GTAs): Perceptions and reflections. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/13562510802602400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okahana, H., & Zhou, E. (2018). Graduate enrollment and degrees: 2007 to 2017. Council of Graduate Schools. Retrieved from https://cgsnet.org/ckfinder/userfiles/files/CGS_GED17_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Patel, V. (2016, April 29). How colleges help foreign grad students with their teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, 62(33), A14.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, V. (2017, August 4). Training graduate students to be effective teachers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 63(42), 16.
   Google Scholar
• Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143–154. doi:10.1080/02602930601127869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13. doi:10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Priceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, D. M., Twale, D. J., & Moore, M. S. (1998). TA teaching effectiveness: The impact of training and teaching experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(4), 440–466. doi:10.1080/00221546.1998.11775144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37(4), 556–569. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., Snyder, C., & Handelsman, M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 314–321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.2.314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, T. (1997). Do we need to train teachers how to administer praise? Self-worth theory says we do. Learning and Instruction, 7(1), 49–63. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)80730-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trees, A. R., Kerssen-Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009). Earning influence by communicating respect: Facework’s contributions to effective instructional feedback. Communication Education, 58(3), 397–416. doi:10.1080/03634520802613419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2000, April). Positive (negative) feedback: Encouragement or discouragement? Retrieved from http://www/huji.ac.il/unew/main.html
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, G. M., & Case, R. E. (2019). Tale of the tape: International teaching assistant noticing during videotaped classroom observations. Journal of International Students, 5(4), 434–446. doi:10.32674/jis.v5i4.406
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. L., & Kerssen-Griep, J. (2011). Instructional feedback I: The interaction of facework and immediacy on students’ perceptions of instructor credibility. Communication Education, 60(1), 75–94. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.507820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. L., & Bippus, A. M. (2008). Assessment of graduate teaching assistant (GTA) training: A case study of a training program and its impact on GTAs. Communication Teacher, 22(4), 116–129. doi:10.1080/17404620802382680
   Google Scholar