References

  • Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906–912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
  • Afifi, W. A., & Cornejo, M. (2020). #CommSoWEIRD: The question of sample representativeness in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Doerfel & J. L. Gibbs (Eds.), Organizing inclusion: Moving diversity from demographics to communication processes (pp. 238–259). New York: Routledge.
  • Ainlay, S. C., & Crosby, F. (1986). Stigma, justice, and the dilemma of difference. In S. C. Ainlay, G. Becker, & L. M. Coleman (Eds.), The dilemma of difference: Perspectives in Social Psychology (pp. 17–37). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7568-5_2
  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. The American Psychologist, 46(4), 331–341. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.4.333
  • Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (2004). Social identity theory and the organization. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational identity: A reader (pp. 134–160). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bardeen, J. R., Fergus, T. A., Hannan, S. M., & Orcutt, H. K. (2016). Addressing psychometric limitations of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale through item modification. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 298–309. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1091774
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  • Baumrind, D. (1967). With simplicity and wisdom. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews, 12(9), 475-475. doi:10.1037/007831
  • Braithwaite, D. O., Bach, B. W., Baxter, L. A., DiVerniero, R., Hammonds, J. R., Hosek, A. M., & Wolf, B. M. (2010). Constructing family: A typology of voluntary kin. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 27(3), 388–407. doi:10.1177/0265407510361615
  • Carr, K., Holman, A., Abetz, J., Kellas, J. K., & Vagnoni, E. (2015). Giving voice to the silence of family estrangement: Comparing reasons of estranged parents and adult children in a nonmatched sample. Journal of Family Communication, 15(2), 130–140. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1013106
  • Dailey, R. M. (2006). Confirmation in parent–adolescent relationships and adolescent openness: Toward extending confirmation theory. Communication Monographs, 73(4), 434–458. doi:10.1080/03637750601055432
  • DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. E., & Masicampo, E. J. (2009). Rejection: Resolving the paradox of emotional numbness after exclusion. In A. L. Vangelisti (Ed.), Handbook of hurt feelings in close relationships (pp. 123–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511770548.008
  • DeWall, C. N., & Bushman, B. J. (2011). Social acceptance and rejection: The sweet and the bitter. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 256–260. doi:10.1177/0963721411417545
  • DiStefano, C., & Motl, R. W. (2006). Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(3), 440–464. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
  • Dorrance Hall, E. (2015). The process and dimensions of family member marginalization [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from Proquest. (3719163). Indiana, USA: Purdue University.
  • Dorrance Hall, E. (2017). The process of family member marginalization: Turning points experienced by “black sheep“. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 491–512. doi:10.1111/pere.12196
  • Dorrance Hall, E. (2018). The communicative process of resilience for marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(3), 307–328. doi:10.1177/0265407516683838
  • Dorrance Hall, E., & Wilson, S. R. (2021). Explicating the dimensions and types of marginalized family members. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2099–2120. doi:10.1177/02654075211003981
  • Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1990). Separate lives: Why siblings are so different. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Hess, J. (2000). Maintaining nonvoluntary relationships with disliked partners: An investigation into the use of distancing behaviors. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 458–488. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00765.x
  • Hitlan, R. T., Cliffton, R. J., & DeSoto, M. C. (2006). Perceived exclusion in the workplace: The moderating effects of gender on work-related attitudes and psychological health. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(2), 217–236.
  • Hitlan, R. T., & Noel, J. (2009). The influence of workplace exclusion and personality on counterproductive work behaviours: An interactionist perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(4), 477–502. doi:10.1080/13594320903025028
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hogg, M. A. (2005). All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others: Social identity and marginal membership. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 243–261). New York NY: Psychology Press.
  • Horstman, H. K., Schrodt, P., Warner, B., Koerner, A., Maliski, R., Hays, A., & Colaner, C. W. (2018). Expanding the conceptual and empirical boundaries of family communication patterns: The development and validation of an expanded conformity orientation scale. Communication Monographs, 85(2), 157–180. doi:10.1080/03637751.2018.1428354
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jensen, A. C., Whiteman, S. D., Fingerman, K. L., & Birditt, K. S. (2013). “Life still isn’t fair”: Parental differential treatment of young adult siblings. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 75(2), 438–452. doi:10.1111/jomf.12002
  • Kang, J., & Downey, G. (2007). Rejection sensitivity. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 741–742). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412956253.n444
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. (2002). Toward a theory of family communication. Communication Theory, 12(1), 70–91. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00260.x
  • Lay, C., Fairlie, P., Jackson, S., Ricci, T., Eisenberg, J., Sato, T., … Melamud, A. (1998). Domain-specific allocentrism-idiocentrism: A measure of family connectedness. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(3), 434–460. doi:10.1177/0022022198293004
  • Leary, M. R. (2005). Variations of interpersonal rejection. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 243–261). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Leary, M. R. (2010). Affiliation, acceptance, and belonging: The pursuit of interpersonal connection. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey Eds., Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 864–897). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002024.
  • Lucksted, A., & Drapalski, A. L. (2015). Self-stigma regarding mental illness: Definition, impact, and relationship to societal stigma. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 38(2), 99–102. doi:10.1037/prj0000152
  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
  • McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., & Daly, J. A. (1975). The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(4), 323–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x
  • Moussaid, M., Kammer, J. E., Analytis, P. P., & Neth, H. (2013). Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation. PloS One, 8(11), e78433. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078433
  • Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., MacDonald, G., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1998). Through the looking glass darkly? When self-doubts turn into relationship insecurities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1459–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1459
  • Özen, D. S., & Güneri, F. K. (2018). Basic determinant of success of interpersonal relationship: Rejection sensitivity. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 10(4), 444–459. doi:10.18863/pgy.360041
  • Rhee, E., Uleman, J. S., & Lee, H. K. (1996). Variations in collectivism and individualism by ingroup and culture: Confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 1037–1054. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.1037
  • Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S., & Zaalberg, R. (2008). Attack, disapproval, or withdrawal? The role of honour in anger and shame responses to being insulted. Cognition and Emotion, 22(8), 1471–1498. doi:10.1080/02699930701822272
  • Rohner, R. P. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire (PARQ): Test manual. In R. P. Rohner & A. Khaleque (Eds.), Handbook for the study of parental acceptance and rejection (4th ed., pp. 43–106). Mansfield CT: Rohner Research Publications.
  • Sato, T. (2007). The family allocentrism-idiocentrism scale: Convergent validity and construct exploration. Individual Differences Research, 5(3), 194–200.
  • Scharp, K. M. (2019). “You’re not welcome here”: A grounded theory of family distancing. Communication Research, 46(4), 427–455. doi:10.1177/0093650217715542
  • Scharp, K. M., & Dorrance Hall, E. (2017). Family marginalization, alienation, and estrangement: A review of and call for research that questions the nonvoluntary status of family relationships. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 28–45. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1285680
  • Scharp, K. M., & Dorrance Hall, E. (2019). Reconsidering family closeness: A review and call for research on family distancing. Journal of Family Communication, 19(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/15267431.2018.1544563
  • Scharp, K. M., Kubler, K. F., & Wang, T. R. (2020). Individual and community practices for constructing communicative resilience: Exploring the communicative processes of coping with parental alienation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 48(2), 207–226. doi:10.1080/00909882.2020.1734225
  • Scharp, K. M., Thomas, L. J., & Paxman, C. G. (2015). “It was the straw that broke the camel’s back”: Exploring the distancing processes communicatively constructed in parent-child estrangement backstories. Journal of Family Communication, 15(4), 330–348. doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1076422
  • Sechrest, L. (2005). Validity of measures is no simple matter. Health Services Research, 40(5), 1584–1604. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00443.x
  • Settles, I. H., & Buchanan, N. T. (2014). Multiple groups, multiple identities, and intersectionality. In V. Benet-Martínez & Y. Y. Hong (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of multicultural identity (pp. 160–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199796694.013.017
  • Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(3), 194–200. doi:10.1080/10705500802222972
  • Van den Berg, L. J. M., Tollenaar, M. S., Pittner, K., Block, L. H. C. G. C., Buisman, R. S. M., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Elzinga, B. M. (2018). Pass it on? The neural responses to rejection in the context of a family study on maltreatment. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 13(6), 616–627. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy035
  • Wilson, S. R., Chernichky, S. M., Wilkum, K., & Owlett, J. S. (2014). Do family communication patterns buffer children from difficulties associated with a parent’s military deployment? Examining deployed and at-home parents’ perspectives. Journal of Family Communication, 14(1), 32–52. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.857325

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.