Contemporary Research Methodologies in Technical Communication

REFERENCES

• Artemeva, N. & Freedman, A. (Eds.). (2007). Rhetorical genre studies and beyond. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Inkshed Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bawarshi, A. & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genre and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79–99). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1997). Discursively structured activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 296–308.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2013). A rhetoric of literate action (Vols. 1–2). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10, 475–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blythe, S., Grabill, J. & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 272–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it's like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, L. (2003). Information acceleration and visual trends in print, television, and web news sources. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12, 155–181.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D. & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. (2011). Rhetorical agency as emergent and enacted. College Composition and Communication, 62, 420–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2008). The use of cognitive and social apprenticeship to teach a disciplinary genre: Initiation of graduate students into NIH grant writing. Written Communication, 25, 3–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H. & Savage, G. (2013). Guest editor's introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. & Bell, G. (2011). Divining a digital future: Mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evia, C. & Patriarca, A. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 340–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, K. & Haas, C. (2012). A grounded theory approach for studying writing and literacy. In K. Powell & P. Takayoshi (Eds.), Practicing research in writing studies: Reflexive and ethically responsible research (pp. 81–96). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. (2011). A history of writing. London, England: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, K., Spinuzzi, C., Rickly, R. & Clarke Papper, C. (2008). The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. College Composition and Communication, 60, 388–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraiberg, S. (2013). Reassembling technical communication: A framework for studying multilingual and multimodal practices in global contexts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 10–27.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A. & Smart, G. (1997). Navigating the current of economic policy: Written genres and the distribution of cognitive work at a financial institution. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 238–255.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (2007). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction. (Original work published 1967)
   Google Scholar
• Goubil-Gambrell, P. (1998). Guest editor's column. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7, 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T. (2003). Community computing and citizen productivity. Computers and Composition, 20, 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, L. (2013). Iconographic tracking: A digital research method for visual rhetoric and circulation studies. Computers and Composition, 30, 332–348.
   Google Scholar
• Gygi, K. & Zachry, M. (2010). Productive tensions and the regulatory work of genres in the development of an engineering communication workshop in a transnational corporation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24, 358–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2002). Tool-being: Heidegger and the metaphysics of objects. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2005). Guerrilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. (2011). The quadruple object. Washington, DC: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawk, B. (2011). Vitalism, animality, and the material grounds of rhetoric. In J. Packer & S. Wiley (Eds.), Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility and networks (pp. 196–207). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. Resnick J. Levine & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283–307). Washington, DC: APA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J. (1997). Nostalgic angels: Rearticulating hypertext writing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kain, D. & Wardle, E. (2005). Building context: Using activity theory to teach about genre in multi-major professional communication courses. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, 113–139.
   Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. (2014). Guest editor's introduction: Social media in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology—Building society (pp. 225–259). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2013, November). Another way to compose the common world. An executive session of the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. In HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4, 301–307.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mara, A. & Hawk, B. (2009). Posthuman rhetorics and technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. E., Grabill, J. T., Hart-Davidson, W. & McLeod, M. (2011). Content management in the workplace: Community, context, and a new way to organize writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25, 367–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, L. D. & Paretti, M. C. (2010). Activity theory, speech acts, and the “doctrine of infelicity”: Connecting language and technology in globally networked learning environments. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24, 323–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNely, B. (2009). Backchannel persistence and collaborative meaning-making. In SIGDOC '09: Proceedings of the 27th annual international conference on design of communication (pp. 297–304). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B. (2013). Visual research methods and communication design. In K. Gossett (Ed.), SIGDOC '13: Proceedings of the 31st Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 123–132). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B., Gestwicki, P., Gelms, B. & Burke, A. (2013). Spaces and surfaces of invention: A visual ethnography of game development. Enculturation, 15. Retrieved from http://enculturation.net/visual-ethnography
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B. & Rivers, N. (2014). All of the things: Engaging complex assemblages in communication design. In D. L. Jones & B. McNely (Eds.), SIGDOC '14: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirel, B. (1998). “Applied constructivism” for user documentation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 12, 7–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirel, B. (2004). Interaction design for complex problem solving: Developing useful and usable software. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Mirel, B., Barton, E. & Ackerman, M. S. (2008). Researching telemedicine: Capturing complex clinical interactions with a simple interface design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 358–378.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and ecology after the end of the world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. (2005). Objects of desire: Power and passion in collaborative activity. Journal of Mind, Culture and Activity, 12, 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. & Hutchins, E. (1988). Computation via direct manipulation. Final Report: ONR Contract N00014-85-C-0133. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, Institute for Cognitive Science.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2009). Using actor network theory to trace and improve multimodal communication design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 281–301.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2014). Social media in disaster response. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., Seitzinger, J., Jones, D. & Harrison, A. (2011). Tweeting disaster: Hashtag constructions and collisions. In C. J. Costa & C. Meghini (Eds.), SIGDOC '11: Proceedings of the 29th annual international conference on design of communication (pp. 235–240). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2006). A sociocultural theory of writing. In C. MacArthur S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 54–66). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2009). From speech genres to mediated multimodal genre systems: Bakhtin, Voloshinov, and the question of writing. In C. Bazerman A. Bonini & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 17–34). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Propen, A. D. & Schuster, M. L. (2010). Understanding genre through the lens of advocacy: The rhetorical work of the Victim Impact Statement. Written Communication, 27, 3–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullman, G. & Gu, B. (2007). Guest editor's introduction: Rationalizing and rhetoricizing content management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. (2009). Networked exchanges, identity, writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 294–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, J. [Jeff]. (2012). Digital Detroit: Rhetoric and space in the age of the network. Carbondale, IL: SIU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. [Jenny]. (2012). Distant publics: Development rhetoric and the subject of crisis. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickert, T. (2013). Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1993). Vygotsky, Dewey, and externalism: Beyond the student/discipline dichotomy. Journal of Advanced Composition, 13, 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing instruction. In J. Petraglia (Ed.), Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction (pp. 51–76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1997a). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1997b). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces: A review of studies that use cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 224–237.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (2009). Uses of activity theory in written communication research. In A. Sannino H. Daniels & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 40–52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (2010). Writing in multiple contexts: Vygotskian CHAT meets the phenomenology of genre. In C. Bazerman R. Krut K. Lunsford S. McLeod S. Null P. Rogers & A. Stansell (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 353–364). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1986). The origins of writing: An archaeologist's perspective. Written Communication, 3, 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, M. L., Russell, A. L. B., Bartels, D. M. & Kelly-Trombley, H. (2013). “Standing in Terri Shiavo's shoes”: The role of genre in end-of-life decision making. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17, 381–412.
   Google Scholar
• Selfe, C. & Selfe, R. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45, 480–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherlock, L. (2009). Genre, activity, and collaborative work and play in world of warcraft: Places and problems of open systems in online gaming. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 263–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M. (2007). Participation and Power. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slack, J., Miller, D. & Doak, J. (1993). The technical communicator as author: Meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 12–36.
   Google Scholar
• Spafford, M. M., Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L. & Mian, M. (2010). Accessibility and order: Crossing borders in child abuse forensic reports. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19, 118–143.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). Lost in the translation: Shifting claims in the migration of a research technique. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, 411–446.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Guest editor's introduction: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 265–277.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2010). Secret sauce and snake oil: Writing monthly reports in a highly contingent environment. Written Communication, 27, 363–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone, together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2013). Topsight: A guide to studying, diagnosing, and fixing information flow in organizations. Austin, TX: Amazon CreateSpace.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C., Hart-Davidson, W. & Zachry, M. (2006). Chains and ecologies: Methodological notes toward a communicative-mediational model of technologically mediated writing. In R. Pierce & J. Stamey (Eds.), SIGDOC '06: Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 43–50). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Crafting culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2009). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24, 127–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2011). Technological literacy as network building. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20, 274–302.
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. & Kim, L. (2007). Guest editor's introduction: New technological spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23, 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Teston, C. B. (2009). A grounded investigation of gendered guidelines in cancer care deliberations. Written Communication, 26, 320–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teston, C. B. (2012). Moving from artifact to action: A grounded investigation of visual displays of evidence during medical deliberations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 187–209.
   Google Scholar
• Varpio, L., Spafford, M. M., Schryer, C. F. & Lingard, L. (2007). Seeing and listening: A visual and social analysis of optometric record-keeping practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, 343–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whithaus, C. (2012). Claim-evidence structures in environmental science writing: Modifying Toulmin's model to account for multimodal arguments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21, 105–128.
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. (1994). Invention and writing in technical work: Representing the object. Written Communication, 11, 227–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. A. (2001). Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 5–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachry, M. (2006). Interview with Bonnie A. Nardi. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 483–503.
   Google Scholar