1,130
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Values and Validity: Navigating Messiness in a Community-Based Research Project in Rwanda

REFERENCES

  • Africa Development Bank. (2011). Rwanda: Bank group country strategy paper 2012–2016. Retrieved from http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/Rwanda%20-%20CSP%202012-2016.pdf
  • Agboka, G. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 28–49.
  • Bakardjieva, M., Feenberg, A. & Goldie, J. (2004). User-centered internet research: The ethical challenge. In E. A. Buchanan (Ed.), Readings in virtual research ethics: Issues and controversies (pp. 338–350). Hershey, PA: Information Science.
  • Baldauf, S. (2007). Rwanda aims to become Africa's high-tech hub. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1017/p01s02-woaf.html
  • Bandyopadhyay, T. & Negash, S. (2009). Factors affecting PC use among African youth: Empirical study from Ethiopia and Rwanda. In Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference—SAISC ‘09 (pp. 140–145). Charleston, SC: Georgia Southern University. Retrieved from http://sais.aisnet.org/2009/proceedings/SAIS%202009.pdf/Bandyopadhyay,%20Negash.pdf
  • Berman, R. C. & Tyyska, V. (2010). A critical reflection on the use of translators/interpreters in a qualitative cross-language research project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10, 178–190.
  • Blumenstock, J., Gillick, D. & Eagle, N. (2010, March). Who's calling? Demographics of mobile phone use in Rwanda. AAAI Spring Symposium 2010 on Artificial Intelligence for Development (AI-D) (pp. 116–117). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
  • Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T. & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22, 272–298.
  • Boal, A. (1979). The theatre of the oppressed. New York, NY: Urizen Books.
  • Bowdon, M. (2004). Technical communication and the role of the public intellectual: A community HIV-prevention case study. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 325–340.
  • Brink, P. J. (1991). Issues of reliability and validity. In J. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 164–86). London, England: Sage.
  • Burawoy, M. (2009). Public ethnography as film: Michael Apted and the Up! series. Ethnography, 10, 317–319.
  • Clark, D. (2004). Is professional writing relevant? A model for action research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 307–324.
  • Clark, D. (2010). Shaped and shaping tools: The rhetorical nature of technical communication technologies. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 85–102). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cole, A. & Knowles, J. G. (2008). Arts-informed research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 55–69). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Conquergood, D. (2002). Performance studies: Interventions and radical research. The Drama Review, 46, 145–156.
  • Crabtree, R. & Sapp, D. (2005). Technical communication, participatory action research, and global civic engagement: A teaching, research, and social action collaboration in Kenya. REFLECTIONS: A Journal of Rhetoric, Civic Writing and Service Learning, 4, 9–33.
  • Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G. & Kock, N. (2004). Principles of canonical action research. Information Systems Journal, 14, 65–86.
  • Ding, H. (2009). Rhetorics of alternative media in an emerging epidemic: SARS, censorship, and extra-institutional risk communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 327–350.
  • Donnor, J. (2006). The use of mobile phones by microentrepreneurs in Kigali, Rwanda: Changes to social and business networks. Information Technologies & International Development, 3, 3–19.
  • Driesbach, C., Walton, R., Kolko, B. E. & Seidakmatova, A. (2009). Asking Internet users to explain non-use in Kyrgyzstan. In Proceedings From the International Professional Communication Conference—IPCC 2009 (pp. 1–6). Waikiki, HI: IEEE
  • Dysart-Gale, D., Pitula, K. & Radhakrishnan, T. (2011). Culture, communication, and ICT for development: A Caribbean study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 54, 43–55.
  • Edwards, R. (1998). A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24, 197–208.
  • Evia, C. & Patriarca, A. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 340–367.
  • Faber, B. (2002). Community action and organizational change: Image, narrative, and identity. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. London, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Flammia, M. (2005). Preparing technical communication students to play a role on the translation team. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 401–412.
  • Fleckenstein, K. S., Spinuzzi, C., Rickly, R. J. & Papper, C. C. (2008). The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for writing research. College Composition and Communication, 60, 388–419.
  • Gauntlett, D. (1997). Video critical: Children, the environment and media power. London, England: John Libbey.
  • Gauntlett, D. & Holzwarth, P. (2006). Creative and visual methods for exploring identities. Visual Studies, 21, 82–91.
  • Grabill, J. T. (2000). Shaping local HIV/AIDS services policy through activist research: The problem of client involvement. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9, 29–50.
  • Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29, 75–91.
  • Hughes, M. A. & Hayhoe, G. F. (2008). A research primer for technical communication. New York, NY: Earlbaum.
  • Human Rights Watch. (2003). Lasting wounds: Consequences of genocide and war for Rwanda's children. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3f4f595a12.html
  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. P. & Becker, A. B. (2001). Community-based participatory research: Policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 14, 182–197.
  • Johnson, R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Jones, N. (2014). Methods and meanings: Reflections on reflexivity and flexibility in an intercultural ethnographic study of an activist organization. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5, 14–43.
  • Kanyesigye, F. (2012, April 14). Youth, ICT ministries merged. The New Times. Retrieved from http://mail.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=14962&a=52483
  • Kapborg, I. & Berterö, C. (2002). Using an interpreter in qualitative interviews: Does it threaten validity? Nursing Inquiry, 9, 52–56.
  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). The foundation of behavioral research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Lane, S. D., Rubenstein, R. A., Narine, L., Back, I., Cornell, C. & Hodgens, A. (2011). Action anthropology and pedagogy: University-community collaborations in setting policy. Human Organization, 70, 289–299.
  • Larkin, P., Dierckx de Casterlé, B. & Schotsmans, P. (2007). Multilingual translation issues in qualitative research: Reflections on a metaphorical process. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 468–476.
  • Le Dantec, C. A. & Edwards, W. K. (2008). Designs on dignity: Perceptions of technology among the homeless. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI '08 (pp. 627–636). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Long, R. G., White, M. C., Friedman, W. H. & Brazeal, D. V. (2000). The ‘qualitative’ versus ‘quantitative’ research debate: A question of metaphorical assumptions? International Journal of Value-Based Management, 3, 189–197.
  • Longo, B. (2010). Human + machine culture: Where we work. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Digital literacy for technical communication: 21st century theory and practice (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McIntyre, M. & Cole, A. (2008). Love stories about caregiving and Alzheimer's disease: A performance methodology. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 213–255.
  • McNely, B. J. (2013). Visual research methods and communication design. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication—SIGDOC '13 (pp. 123–132). New York, NY: ACM Press.
  • Melton, J. (2008). Lost in translation: Professional communication competencies in global training contexts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51, 198–214.
  • Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40, 610–617.
  • Miller, C. R. (1989). What's practical about technical writing?. In B. E. Fearing & W. K. Sparrow (Eds.), Technical writing: Theory and practice (pp. 14–32). New York, NY: MLA.
  • Minkler, M. (2005). Community-based research partnerships: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Urban Health, 82, ii3–ii12.
  • Minkler, M. & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
  • Mosher, H. (2013). A question of quality: The art/ science of doing collaborative public ethnography. Qualitative Research, 13, 428–441.
  • Musoni, E. (2010, December 29). Rwanda: 50 percent have access to mobile phones. The New Times. Retrieved from http://allafrica.com/stories/201012290119.html
  • Negash, S. (2012). Perception of African youth on personal computer utilization: The case of Ethiopia and Rwanda. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 3, 39–59.
  • Nyirabera, M. C. (2012, August 8). Ubushakashatsi bwa youth connection mu gufasha urubyiruko kuva mu bibazo. [Youth connection research to help challenges of young adults] IGIHE. Retrieved from http://www.igihe.com/amakuru/u-rwanda/ubushakashyatsi-bwa-youth-connection-buzafasha-urubyiruko-kuva-mu-bibazo-rufite
  • Ornatowski, C. M. & Bekins, L. K. (2004). What's civic about technical communication? Technical communication and the rhetoric of “community.” Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 251–269.
  • Pan, Z., Wenjie, Y., Jing, G. & Zheng, J. (2011). Exploring structured inequality in Internet use behavior. Asian Journal of Communication, 21, 116–132.
  • Phillips, H. P. (1960). Problem of translation and meaning in field work. In R. N. Adams & J. J. Preiss (Eds.), Human organization research: Field relations and techniques (pp. 290–307). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
  • Price, R., Walton, R. & Petersen, M. (2014). Methodological journey: Lessons learned from a student-led intercultural pilot study. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5, 90–107.
  • Riessman, C. (2000). “Even if we don't have children [we] can live”: Stigma and infertility in South India. In C. Mattingly & L. C. Garro (Eds.), Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing (pp. 128–152). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Risku, H. (2001). Migrating from translation to technical communication and usability. In G. Hansen K. Malmkjaer & D. Gile (Eds.), Claims, changes and challenges in translation studies (pp. 181–196). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
  • Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, S. I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London, England: Sage.
  • Rubinstein-Ávila, E. (2013). Accounting for—and owning up to—the messiness in cross-cultural/linguistic qualitative research: Toward methodological reflexivity in South America's Internet cafés. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 1041–1061.
  • Rude, C. D. (2004). Toward an expanded concept of rhetorical delivery: The uses of reports in public policy debates. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13, 271–288.
  • Rude, C. D. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 174–215.
  • Rylko-Bauer, B., Singer, M. & Willigen, J. V. (2006). Reclaiming applied anthropology: Its past, present, and future. American Anthropologist, 108, 178–190.
  • Schensul, J. J. (1999). Organizing community research partnerships in the struggle against AIDS. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 266–283.
  • Schensul, J. J., Robison, J., Reyes, C., Radda, K., Gaztambide, S. & Disch, W. (2006). Building interdisciplinary/intersectoral research partnerships for community-based mental health research with older minority adults. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 79–93.
  • Schwabenland, C. (2002). Toward a paradigm shift: Lessons from anti-oppression movements. In J. Merrifield R. Tandon C. Flower & C. Schwabenland (Eds.), Participation—North and South: New ideas in participatory development from India and the UK (pp. 5–17). London, England: The Elfida Society.
  • Scott, J. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
  • Seymour, S. (2012). The use of life history collage to explore learning related to the enactment of social consciousness in female nonprofit leaders (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan, UT.
  • Simmons, W. M. (2007). Participation and power. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Simon, S. (1996). Gender in translation: Cultural identity and the politics of transmission. London, England: Routledge.
  • Singhal, A. & Rattine-Flaherty, E. (2006). Pencils and photos as tools of communicative research and praxis: Analyzing Minga Perú's quest for social justice in the Amazon. The International Communication Gazette, 68, 313–330.
  • Sleeswijk Visser, F., Jan Stappers, P., van der Lugt, R. & Sanders, E. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 1, 119–149.
  • Sommers, M. (2006). Fearing Africa's young men: The case of Rwanda. Paper No. 32. World Bank 35149. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Soucy, K. (2012). Collaging: Getting answers to the questions you don't know to ask. Smashing Magazine. Retrieved from http://uxdesign.smashingmagazine.com/2012/02/06/collaging-getting-answers-questions-you-dont-know-ask
  • Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Spinuzzi, C. (2005). Lost in the translation: Shifting claims in the migration of a research technique. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14, 411–446.
  • Squires, A. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 277–287.
  • St. Amant, K. & Sapienza, F. (2011). Culture, communication and cyberspace: Rethinking technical communication for international online environments. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
  • Starke-Meyerring, D., Duin, A. H. & Palvetzian, T. (2007). Global partnerships: Positioning technical communication programs in the context of globalization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16, 139–174.
  • Sun, H. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 457–481.
  • Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Crafting culture-sensitive technology for local users. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Temple, B. & Young, A. (2004). Qualitative research and translation dilemmas. Qualitative Research, 4, 161–178.
  • Thatcher, B. (2006). Intercultural rhetoric, technology transfer, and writing in U.S.–Mexico border maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 385–405.
  • Thatcher, B. (2010). Reading and writing new media across cultures: Issues of fit, reciprocity, and cultural change. In C. Ball & J. Kalmbach (Eds.), RAW: Reading and writing new media (pp. 157–181). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  • The New Times. (2012, April 19). Rwanda: Tech savvy youth will accelerate development. Retrieved from http://allafrica.com/stories/201204190132.html
  • Usengumukiza, F. (2009, July 28). Overview of Rwanda's ICT context. Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR-Rwanda). PowerPoint Presentation.
  • Varpio, L., Spafford, M. M., Schryer, C. F. & Lingard, L. (2007). Seeing and listening: A visual and social analysis of optometric record-keeping practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, 343–375.
  • Walton, R. (2013). Bridges & barriers to development: Communication modes, media, and devices. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 17. Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/17.3/topoi/walton/index.html
  • Walton, R., Price, R. & Zraly, M. (2013). Rhetorically navigating Rwandan research review: A fantasy theme analysis. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 4, 78–102.
  • Walton, R., Yaaqoubi, J. & Kolko, B. E. (2012). What's it for? Expectations of Internet value and usefulness in Central Asia. Information Technologies and International Development, 8, 69–84.
  • Ward, L. M. & Eyber, C. (2009). Resiliency of children in child-headed households in Rwanda. Intervention, 7, 17–33.
  • Youngblood, S. A. & Mackiewicz, J. (2013). Lessons in service learning: Developing the Service Learning Opportunities in Technical Communication (SLOT-C) database. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 260–283.
  • Zraly, M. & Ntaganira, J. (2009, December). Youth-led households in Kigali: The social and emotional worlds of a new African public. Paper presented at the American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Zraly, M. & Ntaganira, J. (2013, November). Resilience, endurance, and well-being: Modes of emotional management in post-genocide Rwanda. Paper presented at Society for Psychological Anthropology Biennial Meeting, San Diego, CA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.