10/10 Would Review Again: Variation in the Player Game Review Genre

References

• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (2002). Applied genre analysis: A multi-perspective model. Ibérica: Revista de La Asociación Europea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos, 4, 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (28th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/sci.28
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Duan, W., & Gan, Q. (2011). Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 511–521. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlotte. (2015, April 9). No laughing matter: The problem with Steam’s “funny” review button. Retrieved from http://femhype.com/2015/04/09/no-laughing-matter-the-problem-with-steams-funny-review-button/
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. K., Zimmermann, T., & Nagappan, N. (2014). The first hour experience: How the initial play can engage (or lose) new players. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 57–66). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2658537.2658540
   Google Scholar
• DarkForge Games. (2015, January 15). Valve added a “funny” button to Steam’s… [Facebook Status Update]. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/nekro.darkforgegames/posts/696723857106812
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, I. K. E., & Burgers, C. (2013). Do consumer critics write differently from professional critics? A genre analysis of online film reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 2(2), 75–83. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dom. (2014, November 3). Steam reviews are 10/10 best feature ever. Retrieved from http://egmr.net/2014/11/steam-user-reviews/
   Google Scholar
• Dyer-Witheford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2009). Games of empire global capitalism and video games. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grayson, N. (2014, May 15). Valve slowly but surely making Steam user reviews useful. Retrieved from http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2014/05/15/steam-user-reviews-better/
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Davidson, W. (2007). Web 2.0: What technical communicators should know. Intercom, 54(8), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, S., & Simonsen, J. G. (2013). Extracting usability and user experience information from online user reviews. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2089–2098). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2470654.2481286
   Google Scholar
• Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. C. (2013). Social media in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 1–5. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850841
   Google Scholar
• Kitami, K., Saga, R., & Matsumoto, K. (2011). Comparison analysis of video game purchase factors between Japanese and American consumers. In A. König, A. Dengel, K. Hinkelmann, K. Kise, R. J. Howlett, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), 15th international conference knowledge-based and intelligent information and engineering systems (pp. 285–294). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23854-3_30
   Google Scholar
• Kline, S., Dyer-Witheford, N., & de Peuter, G. (2003). Digital play: The interaction of technology, culture, and marketing. Montréal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, C. (2014, September 5). The most baffling Steam reviews. Retrieved from http://www.pcgamer.com/the-most-baffling-steam-reviews/
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2008). Reviewer motivations, bias, and credibility in online reviews. In S. Kelsey, & K. St. Amant (Eds.), Handbook of research on computer mediated communication (pp. 252–266). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-863-5.ch020
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2010). Assertions of expertise in online product reviews. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(1), 3–28. doi:10.1177/1050651909346929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2014). Motivating quality: The impact of amateur editors’ suggestions on user-generated content at Epinions.com. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(4), 419–446. doi:10.1177/1050651914535930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2015). Quality in product reviews: What technical communicators should know. Technical Communication, 62(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2013). Video games as technical communication ecology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 219–236. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.760062
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, K. S. (2004). Game work: Language, power, and computer game culture. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morain, M., & Swarts, J. (2012). YouTutorial: A framework for assessing instructional online video. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(1), 6–24. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.626690
   Google Scholar
• Selber, S. A. (2010). A rhetoric of electronic instruction sets. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 95–117. doi:10.1080/10572250903559340
   Google Scholar
• Skalicky, S. (2013). Was this analysis helpful? A genre analysis of the Amazon.com discourse community and its “most helpful” product reviews. Discourse, Context & Media, 2(2), 84–93. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2013.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow_Hawk. (2014, January 18). Review for Rust. Retrieved from http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197970343422/recommended/252490/
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taboada, M. (2011). Stages in an online review genre. Text & Talk, 31(2), 247–269. doi:10.1515/text.2011.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentaten, D. (2015, January 16). A self-aware Steam adds “funny” button to user reviews. Retrieved from https://ggtriple.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/a-self-aware-steam-adds-funny-button-to-user-reviews/
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, D. (2014). Craft and narrative in DIY instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 227–246. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.798466
   Google Scholar
• Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299–326. doi:10.2307/258774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagal, J. P., Ladd, A., & Johnson, T. (2009). Characterizing and understanding game reviews. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 215–222). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1536513.1536553
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., & Fang, X. (2014). What nouns and adjectives in online game reviews can tell us about player experience? In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1471–1476). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2559206.2589648
   Google Scholar