Disrupting the Past to Disrupt the Future: An Antenarrative of Technical Communication

References

• Agboka, G. Y. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
   Google Scholar
• Agboka, G. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. doi:10.2190/TW.44.3.e
   Google Scholar
• Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 13(3), 405–436. doi:10.1086/494426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, A. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, B. F., & Barton, M. S. (1993). Ideology and the map: Toward a postmodern visual design practice. In N. R. Blyler & C. Thralls (Eds.), Professional communication: The social perspective (pp. 49–78). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beamer, L. (1992). Learning intercultural communication competence. Journal of Business Communication, 29(3), 285–303. doi:10.1177/002194369202900306
   Google Scholar
• Black, L. L., & Stone, D. (2005). Expanding the definition of privilege: The concept of social privilege. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33(4), 243–255. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1912.2005.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackmon, S. (2004). Which came first? On minority recruitment and retention in the academy. CPTSC Proceedings, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Blyler, N. R. (1995). Research as ideology in professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4(3), 285–313. doi:10.1080/10572259509364602
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D., Rosile, G. A., & Gardner, C. L. (August 2004). Antenarratives, narratives and anaemic stories. Presented at the All Academy Symposium “Actionable Knowledge as the Power to Narrate” Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. (2008). Storytelling organizations. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boje, D. M. (Ed.). (2011). Storytelling and the future of organizations: An antenarrative handbook. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosley, D. S. (1994). Feminist theory, audience analysis, and verbal and visual representation in a technical communication writing task. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(3), 293–307. doi:10.1080/10572259409364573
   Google Scholar
• Brasseur, L. (2005). Florence Nightingale’s visual rhetoric in the rose diagrams. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(2), 161–182. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1402_3
   Google Scholar
• Britt, E. C. (2001). Conceiving normalcy: Rhetoric, law, and the double binds of infertility. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardon, P. W. (2008). A critique of Hall’s contexting model: A meta-analysis of literature on intercultural business and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 399–428. doi:10.1177/1050651908320361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J., & Markel, M. (2001). Web accessibility for people with disabilities: An introduction for web developers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(4), 225–233. doi:10.1109/47.968105
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connors, R. J. (1982). The rise of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12(4), 329–352. doi:10.2190/793K-X49Q-XG7M-C1ED
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, N., & Karis, B. (Eds.). (2000). Technical communication, deliberative rhetoric, and environmental discourse: Connections and directions. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, E. (2015, April 25). Live, work as a team. Retrieved from http://www.ellencushman.com/social-change/-ditsaligo-itsehesdi-live-work-as-a-team
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2013). Transcultural risk communication and viral discourses: Grassroots movements to manage global risks of H1N1 flu pandemic. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 126–149. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.746628
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H., & Savage, G. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 1–9. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.735634
   Google Scholar
• Dobrin, D. N. (1983). What’s technical about technical writing? In P. V. Anderson, R. J. Brockmann, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, practice (pp. 227–250). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, J. M. (2004). Teaching technical communication: Critical issues for the classroom. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Dura, L., Singhal, A., & Elias, E. (2013). Minga Perú’s strategy for social change in the Peruvian Amazon: A rhetorical model for participatory, intercultural practice to advance human rights. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 4(1), 33–54.
   Google Scholar
• Durack, K. (1997). Gender, technology and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 249–260. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0603_2
   Google Scholar
• Eble, M. F., & Gaillet, L. L. (2004). Educating “community intellectuals”: Rhetoric, moral philosophy, and civic engagement. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 341–354. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_7
   Google Scholar
• Evia, C., & Patriarca, A. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 340–367. doi:10.1177/1050651912439697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, M. (2015, March). Addressing normativity in technical communication: Putting technical communication in conversation with queer theory. Paper presented at the Conference for the Association of Teachers of Technical Communication, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Friess, E. (2010). The sword of data: Does human-centered design fulfill its rhetorical responsibility? Design Issues, 26(3), 40–50. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, E. (2015). Apparent feminist pedagogies: Embodying feminist pedagogical practices at East Carolina University. Programmatic Perspectives, 7(2), 251–276.
   Google Scholar
• Getto, G. (2014). Designing for engagement: Intercultural communication and/as participatory design. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5(1), 44–66.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T. (2001). Community literacy programs and the politics of change. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T. (2003). The written city: Urban planning, computer networks, and civic literacies. In B. McComiskey & C. Ryan (Eds.), City comp: Identities, spaces, practices (pp. 128–141). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T., & Simmons, W. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. doi:10.1080/10572259809364640
   Google Scholar
• Gurak, L., & Bayer, N. (2004). Making gender visible: Extending feminist critiques of technology to technical communication. In J. M. Dubinsky (Ed.), Teaching technical communication (pp. 446–457). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Gutsell, M., & Hulgin, K. (2013). Supercrips don’t fly: Technical communication to support ordinary lives of people with disabilities. In L. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 84–94). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, A. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. doi:10.1177/1050651912439539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. A. (2010). Legal literacy: Coproducing the law in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 20(1), 5–24. doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.528343
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, C. G. (1993). Teaching discourse and reproducing culture: A critique of research and pedagogy in professional and non-academic writing. College Composition and Communication, 44(3), 349–363. doi:10.2307/358988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunsinger, R. P. (2006). Culture and cultural identity in intercultural technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 31–48. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_4
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, C., Redish, J., & Summers, K. (2013). Designing for people who do not read easily. In L. K. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability (pp. 39–66). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J. (1996). Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(3), 245–270. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0503_1
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S. A. (Eds.). (2013). Solving problems in technical communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., McDavid, J., Derthick, K., Dowell, R., & Spyridakis, J. (2012). Plain language in environmental policy documents: An assessment of reader comprehension and perceptions. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(4), 331–371.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2014). The importance of ethnographic research in activist networks. In M. F. Williams & O. Pimentel (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 46–62). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2016). Found things: Genre, narrative, and identification in a networked activist organization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4). doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1228790
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2016a). Narrative inquiry in human centered design: Examining silence and voice to promote social justice in design scenarios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(1), 2016. doi:10.1177/0047281616653489
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N. (2016b). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. doi:10.1177/0047281616639472
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., & Walton, R. (forthcoming). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In M. Eble & A. Haas (Eds.), Integrating theoretical frameworks for teaching technical communication.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, S. B. (1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. College English, 54(3), 255–275. doi:10.2307/378062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. (2014). Americans’ changing perceptions of Indian cultural identity: An analysis of Indian call centers. In M. F. Williams & O. Pimentel (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 135–152). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Koerber, A. (2000). Toward a feminist rhetoric of technology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(1), 58–73. doi:10.1177/105065190001400103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, A. (2013). Breast or bottle? Contemporary controversies in infant-feeding policy and practice. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., & Zonia, S. C. (1994). The effects of race and ethnicity on perceptions of human resource policies and climate regarding diversity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(3), 319–334. doi:10.1177/1050651994008003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kynell, T., Tebeaux, E., & Allen, J. (1997). Guest editors’ column. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 245–247. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0603_1
   Google Scholar
• LaDuc, L., & Goldrick-Jones, A. (1994). The critical eye, the gendered lens, and “situated” insights: Feminist contributions to professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 3(3), 245–256. doi:10.1080/10572259409364570
   Google Scholar
• Lay, M. M. (1991). Feminist theory and the redefinition of technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5(4), 348–370. doi:10.1177/1050651991005004002
   Google Scholar
• Limaye, M. R. (1994). Responding to work-force diversity conceptualization and search for paradigms. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 8(3), 353–372. doi:10.1177/1050651994008003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippincott, G. (2003). Rhetorical chemistry: Negotiating gendered audiences in nineteenth-century nutrition studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17(1), 10–49. doi:10.1177/1050651902238544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, P. K., & Atkinson, D. (2008). A conversation on contrastive rhetoric. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout, & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric (pp. 277–298). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, C. (2014). Tweeting collaborative identity: Race, ICTs, and performing Latinidad. In M. F. Williams & O. Pimentel (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 63–86). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. doi:10.2307/375964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, K. (2013). Exposing hidden relations: Storytelling, pedagogy, and the study of policy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(1), 63–78. doi:10.2190/TW.43.1.d
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. (forthcoming). A resistant pedagogy: Black feminist theory as a framework community-based teaching. In M. Eble & A. Haas (Eds.), Integrating theoretical frameworks for teaching technical communication.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. R. (2016). Public engagement in Environmental Impact Studies: A case study of professional communication in transportation planning. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 26(3), 242–260.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. R., & Elliott, T. J. (2016). From participatory design to a listening infrastructure: A case of urban planning and participation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30(1), 59–84. doi:10.1177/1050651915602294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukavetz, A. M. R. (2014). Towards a cultural rhetorics methodology: Making research matter with multi-generational women from the Little Traverse Bay Band. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5(1), 108–125.
   Google Scholar
• Ornatowski, C. M. (1992). Between efficiency and politics rhetoric and ethics in technical writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1(1), 91–103. doi:10.1080/10572259209359493
   Google Scholar
• Ornatowski, C. M., & Bekins, L. K. (2004). What’s civic about technical communication? Technical communication and the rhetoric of “community. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 251–269. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_2
   Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K., & Hewett, B. L. (2013). Accessibility challenges for visually impaired students and their OWI teachers. In L. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 135–156). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K., & Meloncon, L. (2014). Paying attention to accessibility when designing online courses in technical and professional communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(3), 271–300. doi:10.1177/1050651914524780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmeri, J. (2006). Disability studies, cultural analysis, and the critical practice of technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 49–65. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_5
   Google Scholar
• Paretti, M. C. (2003). Managing nature/empowering decision-makers: A case study of forest management plans. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(4), 439–459. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1204_6
   Google Scholar
• Pass, E. (2013). Accessibility and the web design student. In L. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 115–134). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel, C., & Balzhiser, D. (2012). The double occupancy of Hispanics: Counting race and ethnicity in the US census. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 311–339. doi:10.1177/1050651912439696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. E., Sullivan, P., Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Miles, L. (2000). Institutional critique: A rhetorical methodology for change. College Composition and Communication, 51(4), 610–642. doi:10.2307/358914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, R. J., Walton, R., & Petersen, M. (2014). Methodological journey: Lessons learned from a student-led intercultural pilot study. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 5(1), 90–107.
   Google Scholar
• Pyles, L. (2013). Progressive community organizing: A critical approach for a globalizing world. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Redish, J. (2010). Technical communication and usability: Intertwined strands and mutual influences. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(3), 191–201. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2052861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, J. G., & Barnum, C. (2011). Overlap, influence, intertwining: The interplay of UX and technical communication. Journal of Usability Studies, 6(3), 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, F. (2014). The eugenics agenda: Deliberative rhetoric and therapeutic discourse of hate. In M. F. Williams & O. Pimentel (Eds.), Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication (pp. 7–22). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Rude, C. D. (2009). Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23(2), 174–215. doi:10.1177/1050651908329562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvo, M. J. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273–290. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1003_3
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, B. A. (1993). Sense and sensibility in technical documentation: How feminist interpretation strategies can save lives in the nation’s mines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 63–83. doi:10.1177/1050651993007001004
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G., & Mattson, K. (2011). Perceptions of racial and ethnic diversity in technical communication programs. Programmatic Perspectives, 3(1), 5–57.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (1995). Sophistic ethics in the technical writing classroom: Teaching nomos, deliberation, and action. Technical Communication Quarterly, 4(2), 187–199. doi:10.1080/10572259509364596
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV Testing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2004). Rearticulating civic engagement through cultural studies and service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 289–306. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_4
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (2006). Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, M. W., & Grabill, J. T. (2007). Toward a civic rhetoric for technologically and scientifically complex places: Invention, performance, and participation. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 419–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M. (2007). Participation and power. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M., & Zoetewey, M. W. (2012). Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces for public deliberation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 251–276. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.673953
   Google Scholar
• Slack, J. D., Miller, D. J., & Doak, J. (1993). The technical communicator as author: Meaning, power, authority. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7(1), 12–36. doi:10.1177/1050651993007001002
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. O., & Thompson, I. (2002). Feminist theory in technical communication: Making knowledge claims visible. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16(4), 441–477. doi:10.1177/105065102236526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Texts of our institutional lives: Accessibility scans and institutional activity: An activity theory analysis. College English, 70(2), 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 468–499. doi:10.1177/1050651905278033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. L. (1990). Political-ethical implications of defining technical communication as a practice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 10(2), 375–386.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (1989). Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing: A rationale for broadening usability. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32(4), 256–264. doi:10.1109/47.44537
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., & Moore, K. (2013). Time talk: On small changes that enact infrastructural mentoring for undergraduate women in technical fields. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 43(3), 333–354. doi:10.2190/TW.43.3.f
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P., & Porter, J. E. (1998). On theory, practice, and method: Toward a heuristic research methodology for professional writing. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 220–237). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H. (2012). Cross-cultural technology design: Creating culture-sensitive technology for local users. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, B. (2006). Intercultural rhetoric, technology, and writing in Mexican maquilas. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 383–405. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1503_6
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, B. (2010). Editor introduction: Eight needed developments and eight critical contexts for global inquiry. Rhetoric, Professional Communication, and Globalization, 1(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I. (2004). Sex differences in technical communication: A perspective from social role theory. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34(3), 217–232. doi:10.2190/PX6L-N9C7-0EAG-YA2X
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I., & Smith, E. O. (2006). Women and feminism in technical communication: An update. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 36(2), 183–199. doi:10.2190/4JUC-8RAC-73H6-N57U
   Google Scholar
• Victor, D. A. (1992). Intercultural business communication. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, C. (1996). Saving the great lakes: Public participation in environmental policy. In C. G. Herndl & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Green culture: Environmental rhetoric in contemporary America (pp. 141–165). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S. (2010). Toward an accessible pedagogy: Dis/ability, multimodality, and universal design in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 427–454. doi:10.1080/10572252.2010.502090
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2013a). Bridges & barriers to development: Communication modes, media, & devices. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 17(3). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/17.3/topoi/walton/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2013b). Stakeholder flux: Participation in technology-based international development projects. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 409–435. doi:10.1177/1050651913490940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, R. (2016). Supporting human dignity and human rights: A call to adopt the first principle of human-centered design. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(4), 402–426. doi:10.1177/0047281616653496
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. F. (2010). From black codes to recodification: Removing the veil from regulatory writing. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. F. (2013). A survey of emerging research: Debunking the fallacy of colorblind technical communication. Programmatic Perspectives, 5(1), 86–93.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. F., & Pimentel, O. (2012). Introduction: Race, ethnicity, and technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 271–276. doi:10.1177/1050651912439535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M. F., & Pimentel, O. (2014). Communicating race, ethnicity, and identity in technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood, S. A. (2013). Communicating web accessibility to the novice developer: From user experience to application. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(2), 209–232. doi:10.1177/1050651912458924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachry, M., & Thralls, C. (2007). Communicative practices in workplaces and the professions: Cultural perspectives on the regulation of discourse and organizations. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Zdenek, S. (2007). “Just roll your mouse over me”: Designing virtual women for customer service on the web. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(4), 397–430. doi:10.1080/10572250701380766
   Google Scholar