Reddit’s “Explain Like I’m Five”: Technical Descriptions in the Wild

References

• Allen, J. (1990). The case against defining technical writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4(2), 68–77. doi:10.1177/105065199000400204
   Google Scholar
• Bostian, F. F. (1984). Technical writing—“Very useful stuff.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 27(3), 121–125. doi:10.1109/TPC.1984.6448714
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1980). The state and technical innovation: A case study of the electrical vehicle in France. Research Policy, 9(4), 358–376. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(80)90032-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1981). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not: The sociologic of translation. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 197–219). Dordecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–223). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world (G. Burchell, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, M. (2009). Oxford guide to plain English (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daer, A., & Potts, L. (2014). Teaching and learning with social media. Programmatic Perspectives, 6(2), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, A., Grabill, J. T., Hart-Davidson, W., & Iyer, V. (2008). Grassroots: Supporting the knowledge work of everyday life. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(4), 413–434. doi:10.1080/10572250802324937
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, N. (2014). It’s supposed to look like shit: The Internet ugly aesthetic. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 314–339. doi:10.1177/1470412914544516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durack, K. T. (1997). Gender, technology, and the history of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(3), 249–260. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0603_2
   Google Scholar
• ELI5_Modteam. (2015, August). ELI5: How do American blind people tell the difference between different bank notes when they are all the same size? Message posted to https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3fis7p/eli5_how_do_american_blind_people_tell_the/?sort=new
   Google Scholar
• Federal Plain Language Guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.plainlanguage.gov/howto/guidelines/FederalPLGuidelines/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Ferro, T., & Zachry, M. (2014). Technical communication unbound: Knowledge work, social media, and emergent communicative practices. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 6–21. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850843
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R. (2015). Five strategies Internet writers use to “continue the conversation.” Written Communication, 32(4), 396–425. doi:10.1177/0741088315601006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C. J., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 193–208). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T., & Pigg, S. (2012). Messy rhetoric: Identity performance as rhetorical agency in online public forums. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 42(2), 99–119. doi:10.1080/02773945.2012.660369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G., & McClellan, E. D. (2009). Vernacular rhetoric and social movements: Performances of resistance in the rhetoric of the everyday. In S. McKenzie Stevens & P. M. Malesh (Eds.), Active voices: Composing a rhetoric of social movements (pp. 23–46). Binghamton, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwood, R. H. (1988). Explanation and description in science teaching. Science Education, 72(1), 41–49. doi:10.1002/sce.3730720104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImALittleTeaBot. (2015, September). ELI5: What do Tibetan Buddhist monks actually do day-to-day and why are they more well known than other Buddhist monk groups? Message posted to https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3gn9f6/eli5_what_do_tibetan_buddhist_monks_actually_do/?sort=new
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, A., & Rowan, C. (n.d.). Ten hundred words of science. Retrieved from http://tenhundredwordsofscience.tumblr.com
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J. (2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. P. (1986). The genre of technical description. Technical Writing Teacher, 13(1), 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. A. (2006). Cars, culture, and tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 67–86. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_6
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393. doi:10.1007/BF01059830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, B. (1998). An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(1), 53–73. doi:10.1080/10572259809364617
   Google Scholar
• Loudon, M. (2014). “Research in the wild” in online communities: Reddit’s resistance to SOPA. First Monday, 19, 2. doi:10.5210/fm.v19i2.4365
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2010). The co-construction of credibility in online product reviews. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 403–426. doi:10.1080/10572252.2010.502091
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2011). Epinions advisors as technical editors: Using politeness across levels of edit. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 421–448. doi:10.1177/1050651911411038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, J. (2014). Motivating quality: The impact of amateur editors’ suggestions on user-generated content at Epinions.com. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(4), 419–446. doi:10.1177/1050651914535930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. (1972). Explanation in social science: Some recent work. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2(1), 61–81. doi:10.1177/004839317200200105
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B. (2011). Sociotechnical notemaking: Short-form to long-form writing practices. Present Tense, 2(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (2001). Writing in a culture of simulation: Ethos online. In P. Coppock (Ed.), The semiotics of writing: Transdisciplinary perspectives on the technology of writing (pp. 58–83). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2357–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671. doi:10.1177/030631279402400402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monroe, R. (2012, November 12). US space team’s up goer five. XKCD. Retrieved from https://xkcd.com/1133/
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, R. (2015). Thing explainer: Complicated stuff in simple words. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, R. (1989). Patent writing as a heuristic for teaching technical description. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 3(2), 64–77. doi:10.1177/105065198900300205
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, S. (2014). Coordinating constant invention: Social media’s role in distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 69–87. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.796545
   Google Scholar
• Plain Writing Act of 2010, 5 USC § 111–274 (2010). Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr946
   Google Scholar
• Porter, J. E. (2010). Rhetoric in(as) a digital economy. In S. Selber (Ed.), Rhetorics and technologies: New directions in writing and communication (pp. 173–197). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2009). Using actor network theory to trace and improve multimodal communication design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 281–301. doi:10.1080/10572250902941812
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2013). Social media in disaster response. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., & Harrison, A. (2013, September 30–October 1). Interfaces as rhetorical constructions: Reddit and 4chan during the Boston Marathon bombings. sSIGDOC’13, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., & Jones, D. (2011). Contextualizing experiences: Tracing the relationships between people and technologies in the social web. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(3), 338–358. doi:10.1177/1050651911400839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddit. (n.d.-a). Explain like I’m five. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/
   Google Scholar
• Reddit. (n.d.-b). Rules for r/explainlikeimfive. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/about/rules/
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. (2004). Encyclopedia of social theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, T. (n.d.). The up-goer five text editor. Retrieved from http://splasho.com/upgoer5/
   Google Scholar
• Selber, S. A. (2010). A rhetoric of electronic instruction sets. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 95–117. doi:10.1080/10572250903559340
   Google Scholar
• Slattery, S. (2005). An argument for the value of writers’ skill with information technology. Technical Communication, 52(3), 353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slattery, S. (2007). Undistributing work through writing: How technical writers manage texts in complex information environments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 311–325. doi:10.1080/10572250701291046
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2007). Guest editor’s introduction: Technical communication in the age of distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 265–277. doi:10.1080/10572250701290998
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2007). Mobility and composition: The architecture of coherence in non-places. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 279–309. doi:10.1080/10572250701291020
   Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(2), 127–163. doi:10.1177/1050651909353307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarts, J., & Kim, L. (2009). Guest editors’ introduction: New technological spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 211–223. doi:10.1080/10572250902941986
   Google Scholar
• Tveito, S. (1982). Why are today’s technical descriptions still “a journey through the unknown?” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12(2), 161–166. doi:10.2190/EMCG-VXV0-DQCQ-XJYB
   Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum, D. (2014). Craft and narrative in DIY instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 227–246. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.798466
   Google Scholar
• Verzosa Hurley, E., & Kimme Hea, A. C. (2014). The rhetoric of reach: Preparing students for technical communication in the age of social media. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 55–68. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.850854
   Google Scholar
• Vickery, J. R. (2014). The curious case of Confession Bear: The reappropriation of online macro-image memes. Information, Communication & Society, 17(3), 301–325. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.871056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willerton, R. (2015). Plain language and ethical action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zappen, J. P. (2005). Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 319–325. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10
   Google Scholar