Classified Conversations: Psychiatry and Tactical Technical Communication in Online Spaces

References

• Autistic Self Advocacy Network. (2016). About ASAN. Retrieved from http://autisticadvocacy.org/home/about-asan/
   Google Scholar
• Bartesaghi, M. (2009). Conversation and psychotherapy: How questioning reveals institutional answers. Discourse Studies, 11(2), 153–177. doi:10.1177/1461445608100942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2004). Linguistic discourse analysis: How the language in texts works. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Ed.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 57–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2008). Further contributions from the ethical turn in Composition/Rhetoric: Analyzing ethics in interaction. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 596–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. L. (2000). The interactional practices of referrals and accounts in medical discourse: Expertise and compliance. Discourse Studies, 2(3), 259–281. doi:10.1177/1461445600002003001
   Google Scholar
• Bellwoar, H. (2012). Everyday matters: Reception and use as productive design of health-related texts. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(4), 325–345. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.702533
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C. (2008). Patient tales: Case histories and the uses of narrative in psychiatry. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., & Ravotas, D. (1997). Genre as tool in the transmission of practice over time and across professional boundaries. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4(4), 256–274. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0404_4
   Google Scholar
• Compton, W. M., & Guze, S. B. (1995). The neo-Kraepelinian revolution in psychiatric diagnosis. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 245(4–5), 196–201. doi:10.1007/BF02191797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society: On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, M. (2000). Constructing normality: A discourse analysis of the DSM-IV. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 7(1), 69–77. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2850.2000.00261.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (1997). Constructing normalcy: The bell curve, the novel, and the invention of the disabled body in the nineteenth century. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 9–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., & Yergeau, M. (Eds.). (2011). Disability and rhetoric [Special issue]. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(3).
   Google Scholar
• Frances, A. (2013). Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, Big Pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, A. D. (1992). From DSM-I to III-R; voices of self, mastery, and the other: A cultural constructivist reading of U.S. psychiatric classification. Social Science and Medicine, 35(1), 3–24. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90115-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Heilker, P., & King, J. (2010). The rhetorics of online autism advocacy: A case for rhetorical listening. In S. Selber (Ed.), Rhetorics and technologies: New directions in writing and communication (pp. 113–133). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilker, P., & Yergeau, M. (2011). Autism and rhetoric. College English, 73(5), 485–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, A. V. (2002). Creating mental illness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. J. (1993). Medicine, rhetoric, and euthanasia: A case study in the workings of a postmodern discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 79(2), 201–224. doi:10.1080/00335639309384029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. J. (2001). The call of conscience: Heidegger and Levinas, rhetoric and the euthanasia debate. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, J. (2014). Autism and gender: From refrigerator mothers to computer geeks. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2010). The skeleton on the couch: The Eagleton affair, rhetorical disability, and the stigma of mental illness. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 40(5), 459–478. doi:10.1080/02773945.2010.517234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217–250.
   Google Scholar
• Karkasis, K. (2008). Fixing sex: Intersex, medical authority, and lived experience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2007). “Cause someday we all die”: Rhetoric, agency, and the case of the “patient” preferences worksheet. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 93(2), 179–210. doi:10.1080/00335630701425100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. (2006). Cars, culture, and tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 67–86. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_6
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, S. R. (2013). Diagnosis and its discontents: Critical perspectives on psychiatric nosology and the DSM. Feminism & Psychology, 23(1), 10–28. doi:10.1177/0959353512467963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafrance, M. N., & McKenzie-Mohr, S. (2013). The DSM and its lure of legitimacy. Feminism & Psychology, 23(1), 119–140. doi:10.1177/0959353512467974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (2006a). A mad fight: Psychiatry and disability activism. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 339–352). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, B. (2006b). Moving beyond Prozac, DSM, and the new psychiatry: The birth of postpsychiatry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (2007). Bipolar expeditions: Mania and depression in American culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, L. P., & Gerring, J. P. (1994). Revising psychiatry’s charter document: DSM-IV. Written Communication, 11(2), 147–192. doi:10.1177/0741088394011002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, H. A., & Porter, J. E. (2009). The ethics of Internet research: A rhetorical, case-based process. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, N. (2010). The DSM-V project: Bad science produces bad psychiatry. Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry, 12(3), 189–199. doi:10.1891/1559-4343.12.3.189
   Google Scholar
• Metzl, J. (2003). Prozac on the couch: Prescribing gender in the era of wonder drugs. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzl, J. (2009). The protest psychosis: How schizophrenia became a black disease. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirel, B. (2004). Interaction design for complex problem solving: Developing useful and usable software. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, C. (2015). Recuperative ethos and agile epistemologies: Toward a vernacular engagement with mental illness ontologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45(2), 138–163. doi:10.1080/02773945.2015.1010125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncrieff, J. (2010). Psychiatric diagnosis as a political device. Social Theory & Health, 8(4), 370–382. doi:10.1057/sth.2009.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, S. L., & Graham, S. L. (2008). A structural analysis of coherence in electronic charts in juvenile mental health. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 149–172. doi:10.1080/10572250801904622
   Google Scholar
• Prendergrast, C. (2001). On the rhetorics of mental disability. In J. C. Wilson & C. Lewiecki-Wilson (Eds.), Embodied rhetorics: Disability in language and culture (pp. 189–206). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological citizenship. In A. Ong & S. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 439–463). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. doi:10.1177/0741088397014004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., Spafford, M., & Garwood, K. (2003). Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves, writing society: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 62–96). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2011). What, in addition to drugs, do pharmaceutical ads sell? The rhetoric of pleasure in direct-to-consumer advertising for prescription pharmaceuticals. In D. Dysart-Gale & J. Leach (Eds.), Rhetorical questions of health and medicine (pp. 9–32). Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, P., & Mountain, D. (2007). The medical model is dead—Long live the medical model. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191(5), 375–377. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.107.037242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, S. (2015). Neurotribes: The legacy of autism and the future of neurodiversity. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, W. M., & Zoetewey, M. W. (2012). Productive usability: Fostering civic engagement and creating more useful online spaces for public deliberation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 251–276. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.673953
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. L., Harp, B., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2011). Infantilizing autism. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(3), n.p. doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i3.1675
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. (1976). Fundamental principles of disability. London, England: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (1993). DSM-III and the transformation of American psychiatry: A history. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(3), 399–410. doi:10.1176/ajp.150.3.399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yergeau, M. (2013). Clinically significant disturbance: On theorists who theorize theory of mind. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4). doi:10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3876
   Google Scholar