Contingent Faculty, Online Writing Instruction, and Professional Development in Technical and Professional Communication

References

• Bartholomae, D. (2011). Teaching on and off the tenure track: Highlights from the ADE survey of staffing patterns in English. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 11(1), 7–32. doi:10.1215/15314200-2010-012
   Google Scholar
• Bartolotta, J., Bourelle, T., & Newmark, J. (2017). Revising the online classroom: Usability testing for training online technical communication instructors. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E., & Long, B. (2010). Does cheaper mean better? The impact of using adjunct instructors on student outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 598–613. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet, M., Scott, T., & Parascondola, L. (Eds.). (2004). Tenured bosses and disposable teachers. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breuch, L.-A. K. (2015). Faculty preparation for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 349–387). Fort Collins, CO, and Anderson, SC: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/chapter11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cason, J., & Jenkins, P. (2013). Adapting instructional documents to an online course environment. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 213–236). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• CCCC Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013). A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. C. (2005). An argument for pedagogy-driven online education. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 49–66). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. C., & Grant-Davie, K. (Eds.). (2013). Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J., & Jacobe, M. F. (2006). Consequences: An increasingly contingent faculty. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors. Retrieved from https://www.aaup.org/sites/default/files/files/AAUPContingentFacultyIndex2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dutkiewicz, K., Holder, L., & Sneath, W. D. (2013). Creativity and consistency in online courses: Finding the appropriate balance. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 45–72). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, A. (2013). Students in the online technical communication classroom: The next decade. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 133–158). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. L., & Zhang, L. (2004). Do tenured and non-tenure track faculty matter? (Working paper No. 10695). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w10695
   Google Scholar
• Fryrear, A. (2015). Survey response rates. SurveyGizmo. Retrieved from https://www.surveygizmo.com/survey-blog/survey-response-rates/
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, J., & Minter, D. (2013). The rise of the online writing classroom: Reflecting on the material conditions of college composition teaching. College Composition and Communication, 65(1), 140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L. (2015a). Grounding principles for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 33–93). Fort Collins, CO, and Anderson, SC: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/chapter1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L. (2015b). Reading to learn and writing to teach: Literacy strategies for online writing instruction. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & DePew, K. (Eds.). (2015). Foundational principles of online writing instruction. Fort Collins, CO, and Anderson, SC: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & Ehmann, C. (2004). Preparing educators for online writing instruction: Principles and processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & Ehmann Powers, C. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction. Online teaching and learning: Preparation, development, and organizational communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/10572250709336574
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., Robidoux, C., & Remley, D. (2010). Principles for exploring virtual collaborative writing. In B. L. Hewett & C. Robidoux (Eds.), Virtual collaborative writing in the workplace: Computer-mediated communication technologies and processes (pp. 1–27). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo-Santoy, J., & Cano-Monreal, G. (2013). Training faculty for online instruction: Applying technical communication theory to the design of a mentoring program. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 91–112). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• June, A. W. (2012). How universities treat adjuncts limits their effectiveness in the classroom, report says. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Adjuncts-Working-Conditions/133918/
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Maxey, D. (2012). The changing faculty and student success. Pullias Center for Higher Education. University of Southern California Rossier School of Education. Retrieved from http://summaries.thechangingfaculty.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. C. (2009). Perpetual contact: Re-articulating the anywhere, anytime pedagogical model of mobile and wireless composing. In A. C. Kimme Hea (Ed.), Going wireless: A critical exploration of wireless and mobile technologies for composition teachers and researchers (pp. 199–222). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, H., & Galle, W. P. (2011). Tenure, status, and workload: Fundamental issues among business communication faculty. Journal of Business Communication, 48(3), 319–343. doi:10.1177/0021943611406276
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (1979). Axioms for reading the landscape: Some guides to the American scene. In D. Meinig & J. B. Jackson (Eds.), The interpretation of ordinary landscapes (pp. 11–32). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maid, B., & D’Angelo, B. (2013). What do you do when the ground beneath your feet shifts? In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 11–24). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Mechenbier, M. (2015a, March). Putting the “temp” in template: Molding contingent faculty into uniform online course shells. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Mechenbier, M. (2015b). Contingent faculty and OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 227–250). Fort Collins, CO, and Anderson, SC: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/chapter7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (2007). Exploring electronic landscapes: Technical communication, online learning, and instructor preparedness. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 31–53. doi:10.1080/10572250709336576
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (2009). [TechComm Programmatic Central: Faculty and contingent faculty]. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (2012). The rise of academic programs: A call for collaboration. Intercom, 59(7), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (2014). Curricular challenges of emphasis degrees in technical and professional communication. In T. Bridgeford, K. S. Kitalong, & B. Williamson (Eds.), Sharing our intellectual traces: Narrative reflections from administrators of professional, technical, and scientific, communication program (pp. 179–200). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & Arduser, L. (2013). Communities of practice approach: A new model for online course development and sustainability. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 73–90). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & England, P. (2011). The current status of contingent faculty in technical and professional communication. College English, 73(4), 396–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., England, P., & Ilyasova, A. (2016). A portrait of non-tenure-track faculty in technical and professional communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(2), 206–235. doi:10.1177/0047281616633601
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & Henschel, S. (2013). Current state of US undergraduate degree programs in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, B., Mandernach, B. J., & Sanderson, K. (2013). Adjunct versus full-time faculty: Comparison of student outcomes in the online classroom. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 341–352.
   Google Scholar
• Rentz, K., Debs, M. B., & Meloncon, L. (2010). Getting an invitation to the English table and whether or not to accept it. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 281–299. doi:10.1080/10572252.2010.481536
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. (2015). Faculty professionalization and OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 389–410). Fort Collins, CO, and Anderson, SC: WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from https://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/chapter12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, R., & Ramirez, C. (2017). Balancing institutional demands with effective practice: A lesson in curricular and professional development. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Schell, E. (1998). Gypsy academics and mother-teachers: Gender, contingent labor, and writing instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. (2009). Dangerous writing: Understanding the political economy of composition. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vie, S. (2017). Training online technical communication educators to teach with social media: Best practices and professional recommendations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. (2005). Activity theory and the online technical communication course: Assessing quality in undergraduate online instruction. In K. C. Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 207–218). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, R. Z., & Hewett, B. L. (2017). Technical communication coaching: A strategy for instilling reader usability assurance in online course material development. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26, 3.
   Google Scholar