Balancing Institutional Demands with Effective Practice: A Lesson in Curricular and Professional Development

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2004, November). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://olc.onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/survey/entering_the_mainstream2004
   Google Scholar
• Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow, Advanced Technology Group, Apple Computer, Inc. (1992, May). Classroom management: Teaching in high-tech environments: First-fourth year findings (Classroom Management Research Summary #10). Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/euro/pdfs/acotlibrary/rpt10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arola, K. L. (2010). The design of Web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Artze-Vega, I., Bowden, M., Emmons, K., Eodice, M., Hess, S. K., Lamonica, C. C., & Nelms, G. (2013). Privileging pedagogy: Composition, rhetoric, and faculty development. College Composition and Communication, 65(1), 162–184. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43490812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolotta, J., Bourelle, T., & Newmark, J. (2017). Revising the online classroom: Usability testing for training online technical communication instructors. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(3).
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S. (2001). Designing online courses: User-centered practices. Computers and Composition, 18(4), 347–358. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00066-4
   Google Scholar
• Bunn, M. (2013). Motivation and connection: Teaching reading (and writing) in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication, 64(3), 496–516. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43490768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile Cook, K. (2005). An argument for pedagogy-drive online education. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education: Global questions, local answers (pp. 49–66). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc. doi:10.2190/OEGC3
   Google Scholar
• Clayton-Pedersen, A. R., & O’Neill, N. (2005). Curricula designed to meet 21st-century expectations. In D. G. Oblinger & J. L. Oblinger (Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 9.1–9.16). Washington, DC: Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/pub7101i.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Conference on College Composition and Communication. (2013). A position statement of principles and example effective practices for online writing instruction (OWI). Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/cccc/resources/positions/owiprinciples
   Google Scholar
• Cyrs, T. E. (1997). Competence in teaching at a distance. In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.), Teaching and learning at a distance: What it takes to effectively design, deliver, and evaluate programs (pp. 15–18). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Dayton, D., & McShane Vaughn, M. (2007). Developing a quality assurance process to guide the design and assessment of online courses. Technical Communication, 54(4), 475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, K. E., & Magill, J. (2002). Faculty perception and participation in distance education: Pick fruit from the low-hanging branches. In R. Discenza, C. Howard, & K. Schenk (Eds.), The design & management of distance learning programs (pp. 75–92). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, P., & Abbott, C. (2003). Using focus groups to supplement the assessment of technical communication texts, programs, and courses. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 25–45. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1201_3
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. M., & Gerson, S. J. (1991). Using templates to teach technical correspondence. Technical Communication, 38(4), 570–572. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43095842
   Google Scholar
• Harman, J. L. (2008). Moving teaching and learning with technology from adoption to transformation. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(6), 24–25. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/10/moving-teaching-and-learning-with-technology-from-adoption-to-transformation
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, S., Rickly, R., & Day, M. (Eds.). (2000). The online writing classroom. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L. (2015). The online writing conference: A guide for teachers and tutors. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett, B. L., & Ehmann, C. (2004). Preparing educators for online writing instruction: Principles and processes. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo-Santoy, J., & Cano-Monreal, G. (2013). Training faculty for online instruction: Applying technical communication theory to the design of a mentoring program. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 91–112). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc. doi:10.2190/OE2C591-112
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. K. (2002). Meta, meta, meta: Modeling in a methods course for teaching English. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 83–102. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478329
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Curiskis, N. (2006). Online course planning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 42–48. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/05014b.htm
   Google Scholar
• Kastman Breuch, L. (2015). Faculty preparation for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 349–387). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Luck, A. (2001). Developing courses for online delivery: One strategy. The Technology Source Archives at the University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/developing_courses_for_online_delivery/?em_x=22
   Google Scholar
• Marek, K. (2009). Learning to teach online: Creating a culture of support for faculty. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 275–292. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://www.alise.org/jelis-2
   Google Scholar
• Maryland Online. (2016). Quality matters/QM. Retreived from https://www.qualitymatters.org/
   Google Scholar
• Mechenbier, M. (2015). Contingent faculty and OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 227–249). Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & Arduser, L. (2013). Communities of practice approach: A new model for online course development and sustainability. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online education 2.0: Evolving, adapting, and reinventing online technical communication (pp. 73–90). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc. doi:10.2190/OE2C4
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., England, P., & Ilyasova, A. (2016). A portrait of non-tenure-track faculty in technical and professional communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(2), 206–235. doi:10.1177/0047281616633601
   Google Scholar
• Meyen, E. L., Tangen, P., & Lian, C. H. T. (1999). Developing online instruction: Partnership between instructors and technical developers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(1), 18–31. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016264349901400102
   Google Scholar
• Mirtz, R., & Leverenz, C. S. (2000). A mediated coexistence: The case for integrating traditional and online classroom training for new and experienced college teachers. In S. Harrington, R. Rickly, & M. Day (Eds.), The online writing classroom (pp. 319–338). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M. F. (1999). Worlds within which we teach: Issues for designing World Wide Web course material. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(1), 61–72. doi:10.1080/10572259909364649
   Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. G., & Hawkins, B. L. (2006). The myth about online course development: “A faculty member can individually develop and deliver an effective online course.” Educause Review, 41(1), 14–15. Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2006/1/the-myth-about-online-course-development
   Google Scholar
• Online Learning Consortium. (2016). The 5 pillars/OLC quality framework. Author. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/5-pillars/
   Google Scholar
• Onodipe, G., Ayadi, M. F., & Marquez, R. (2016). The efficient design of an online course: Principles of economics. Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 17(1), 39–51. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1804899941?accountid=8360
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, M., Kiefer, K., Hartvigsen, J., & Goodlew, B. (1998). Transitions: Teaching writing in computer-supported and traditional classrooms. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, A. M. (2012). Professional identity in a contingent-labor profession: Expertise, autonomy, community in composition teaching. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 35(2), 108–126. Retrieved from http://wpacouncil.org/archives/35n2/35n2penrose.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R. (2015). Faculty professionalization for OWI. In B. L. Hewett & K. E. DePew (Eds.), Foundational practices of online writing instruction (pp. 389–410). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/owi/
   Google Scholar
• Rude, C. (2005). Strategic planning for online education: Sustaining students, faculty, and programs. In K. Cargile Cook & K. Grant-Davie (Eds.), Online Education: Global Questions, Local Answers (pp. 67–85). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc. doi:10.2190/OEGC4
   Google Scholar
• Schrum, L., & Benson, A. (2002). Establishing successful online distance learning environments: Distinguishing factors that contribute to online courses and programs. In R. Discenza, C. Howard, & K. Schenk (Eds.), The design & management of distance learning programs (pp. 190–204). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. Q. (2004). Teaching with technologies: A reflexive auto-ethnographic portrait. Computers and Composition, 21(1), 49–62. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, B. W. (2000). The academy, online classes, and the breach in ethics. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2000(84), 73–81. doi:10.1002/tl.8410
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical Communication, 52(2), 163–174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/43089196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaiss, C., & Porter, T. (2010). The state of WAC/WID in 2010: Methods and results of the U.S. survey of the international WAC/WID mapping project. College Composition and Communication, 61(3), 534–570. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40593339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiberius, R. G. (2001). A brief history of educational development: Implications for teachers and developers. In D. Lieberman (Ed.), To Improve the Academy (Vol. 20, pp.20–37). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Torrisi, G., & Davis, G. (2000). Online learning as a catalyst for reshaping practice—The experiences of some academics developing online learning materials. International Journal for Academic Development, 5(2), 166–176. doi:10.1080/13601440050200770
   Google Scholar
• Vie, S. (2017). Training online technical communication educators to teach with social media: Best practices and professional recommendations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(3).
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., & Morris, L. V. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32(1), 35–47. doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9033-5
   Google Scholar