Mapping the Terrain: Examining the Conditions for Alignment Between the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine and the Medical Humanities

References

• Angeli, E. L. (2012). Metaphors in the rhetoric of pandemic flu: Electronic media coverage of H1N1 and swine flu. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 42(3), 203–222. doi:10.2190/TW.42.3.b
   Google Scholar
• Angeli, E. L. (2015). Three types of memory in emergency medical services communication. Written Communication, 32(1), 3–38. doi:10.1177/0741088314556598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduser, L. (2017). Living chronic: Agency and expertise in the rhetoric of diabetes. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., Evans, B., Woods, A., & Kearns, R. (2015). ‘The medical’ and ‘health’ in a critical medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities, 36(1), 71–81. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9314-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2000). The interactional practices of referrals and accounts in medical discourse: Expertise and compliance. Discourse Studies, 2(3), 259–281. doi:10.1177/1461445600002003001
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2001). Design in observational research on the discourse of medicine: Toward disciplined interdisciplinarity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15(3), 309–332. doi:10.1177/105065190101500303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2004). Discourse methods and critical practice in professional communication: The front-stage and back-stage discourse of prognosis in medicine. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(1), 67–111. doi:10.1177/1050651903258127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, E. (2005). Introduction to the special issue: The discourses of medicine. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(3), 245–248. doi:10.1177/1050651905275636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batistatou, A., Doulis, E. A., Tiniakos, D., Anogiannaki, A., & Charalabopoulos, K. (2010). The introduction of medical humanities in the undergraduate curriculum of Greek medical schools: Challenge and necessity. Hippokratia, 14(4), 241–243. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3031316/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, S. A. (2003). Improving document review practices in pharmaceutical companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 17(4), 439–473. doi:10.1177/1050651903255345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boettger, R. K., Friess, E., & Carliner, S. (2014, October). Who says what to whom? Assessing the alignment of content and audience between scholarly and professional publications in technical communication (1996–2013). In Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2014 IEEE International (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Boettger, R. K., & Palmer, L. A. (2010). Quantitative content analysis: Its use in technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53(4), 346–357. doi:10.1109/TPC.2010.2077450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, H. (2011). Defining the medical humanities: Three conceptions and three narratives. Journal of Medical Humanities, 32(1), 1–7. doi:10.1007/s10912-009-9094-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burleson, D. (2013). Communication challenges in the hospital setting: A comparative case study of hospitalists’ and patients’ perceptions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28(2), 187–221. doi:10.1177/1050651913513901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2013). To whom do we speak? The audiences for scholarship on the rhetoric of science and technology. Poroi: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, 9(1), Article 7 Retrieved from: http://ir.uiowa.edu/poroi/vol9/iss1/7/. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1151
   Google Scholar
• Chiapperino, L., & Boniolo, G. (2014). Rethinking medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities, 35(4), 377–387. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9269-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edbauer, J. (2005). Unframing models of public distribution: From rhetorical situation to rhetorical ecologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 35(4), 5–24. doi:10.1080/02773940509391320
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, K. (2013). Embracing interdependence: Technology developers, autistic users, and technical communicators. In L.Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessibility: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 15–38). New York, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, H. M., & Greaves, D. A. (2002). “Medical humanities”—What’s in a name? Medical Humanities, 28(1), 1–3. doi:10.1136/mh.28.1.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, H. M., & Greaves, D. A. (2010). Ten years of medical humanities: A decade in the life of a journal and a discipline. Medical Humanities, 36(2), 66–68. doi:10.1136/jmh.2010.005603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigante, M. E. (2017). Argumentation by self-model: Missing methods and opportunities in the personal narratives of popular health coaches. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047281617696984
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G. (2007). Medical tables, graphics, and photographs: How they work. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(4), 419–433. doi:10.2190/5511-470N-G082-5460
   Google Scholar
• Haas, C. (2009). Special issue call for papers: Writing and medicine. Written Communication, 26(2), 210–211. doi:10.1177/0741088309332047
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. (2002). The rhetoric of promoting health. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 32(2), 125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Hammar, L. (1999). Re-embodying subjects in the medical humanities: Introduction to the theme issue. Journal of Medical Humanities, 20(2), 77–79. doi:10.1023/A%3A1022990618950
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. A., & Lam, C. (2016). Patterns of dissemination: Examining and documenting practitioner knowledge sharing practices on blogs. Technical Communication, 63(4), 328–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harry, B., Sturges, K. M., & Klingner, J. K. (2005). Mapping the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educational Researcher, 34(2), 3–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X034002003
   Google Scholar
• Heifferon, B., & Brown, S. (2000). Guest editors’ column. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(3), 245–248. doi:10.1080/10572250009364698
   Google Scholar
• Herselman, S. (1996). Some problems in health communication in a multicultural clinical setting: A South African experience. Health Communication, 8(2), 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutto, D. (2008). Graphics and ethos in biomedical journals. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38(2), 111–131. doi:10.2190/TW.38.2.b
   Google Scholar
• Jack, J. (2010). What are neurorhetorics? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 40(5), 405–410. doi:10.1080/02773945.2010.519758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2015). An ecological turn in rhetoric of health scholarship: Attending to the historical flow and percolation of ideas, assumptions, and arguments. Communication Quarterly, 63(5), 522–526. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1103600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2014). Public engagements with health and medicine. Journal of Medical Humanities, 35(2), 103–109. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9275-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, L., Young, A. J., Neimeyer, R. A., Baker, J. N., & Barfield, R. C. (2008). Keeping users at the center: Developing a multimedia interface for informed consent. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 335–357. doi:10.1080/10572250802100451
   Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum, K. (2012). Physician communication in the operating room: Expanding application of face-negotiation theory to the health communication context. Health Communication, 27(3), 292–301. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.585449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, A., & McMichael, L. (2008). Qualitative sampling methods: A primer for technical communicators. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(4), 454–473. doi:10.1177/1050651908320362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerber, A., & Still, B. (2008). Guest editors’ introduction: Online health communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 259–263. doi:10.1080/10572250802100329
   Google Scholar
• Kolodziejski, L. R. (2014). Harms of hedging in scientific discourse: Andrew wakefield and the origins of the autism vaccine. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 165–183. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.816487
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, L., Garwood, K., Schryer, C. F., & Spafford, M. M. (2003). A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science and Medicine, 56(3), 603–616. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00057-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, L., Schryer, C., Garwood, K., & Spafford, M. (2003). “Talking the talk”: School and workplace genre tension in clerkship case presentations. Medical Education, 37(7), 612–620. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01553.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loel, K., Young, A. J., Neimeyer, R. A., Baker, J. N., & Barfield, R. C. (2008). Keeping users at the center: Developing a multimedia interface for informed consent. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 335–357. doi:10.1080/10572250802100451
   Google Scholar
• Longo, B., Weinert, C., & Fountain, T. K. (2007). Implementation of medical research findings through insulin protocols: Initial findings from an ongoing study of document design and visual display. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(4), 435–452. doi:10.2190/V986-K02V-519T-721J
   Google Scholar
• Lyne, J. (2001). Contours of intervention: How rhetoric matters to biomedicine. Journal of Medical Humanities, 22(1), 3–13. doi:10.1023/A%3A1026622309671
   Google Scholar
• MacNealy, M. S. (1999). Strategies for empirical research in writing. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & Frost, E. (2015). Charting an emerging field: The rhetorics of health and medicine and its importance in communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(4), 7–14. doi:10.1145/2826972.2826973
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods source book. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moeller, M. (2015). Pushing boundaries of normalcy: Employing critical disability studies in analyzing medical advocacy websites. Communication Design Quarterly, 2(4), 52–80. doi:10.1145/2721874.2721877
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. (2009). Gestural enthymemes: Delivering movement in 18th- and 19th-century medical images. Written Communication, 26(3), 273–294. doi:10.1177/0741088309335404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. (1982). The realm of rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L., (1969). The new rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A., Bleakley, A., Brömer, R., & Marshall, R. (2008). The medical humanities today: Humane health care or tool of governance? Journal of Medical Humanities, 29(1), 1–4. doi:10.1007/s10912-007-9044-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Podolsky, S. H., & Greene, J. A. (2016). Are the medical humanities for sale? Lessons from a historical debate. Journal of Medical Humanities, 37(4), 355–370. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9301-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popham, S. L., & Graham, S. L. (2008). A structural analysis of coherence in electronic charts in juvenile mental health. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 149–172. doi:10.1080/10572250801904622
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A. R. (2016). Building on bibliography: Toward useful categorization of research in rhetorics of health and medicine. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication. Retrieved from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0047281617696984
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D. (2008). Designing procedural graphics for surgical patient-education modules: An experimental study. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 173–201. doi:10.1080/10572250701878850
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln, (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769–802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, C., Lingard, L., Spafford, M., & Garwood, K. (2003). Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing society: Perspectives on writing (pp. 62–96). Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F., Lingard, L., & Spafford, M. M. (2005). Techne or artful science and the genre of case presentations in healthcare settings. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 234–260. doi:10.1080/03637750500120485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B., Segal, J. Z., & Keränen, L. (2013). The rhetorics of health and medicine: Inventional possibilities for scholarship and engaged practice. Poroi, an Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention. Retrieved from: http://ir.uiowa.edu/poroi/vol9/iss1/17/
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practice of HIV testing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2005). Interdisciplinarity and bibliography in rhetoric of health and medicine. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 311–318. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_9
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2009). Internet health and the 21st-century patient: A rhetorical view. Written Communication, 26(4), 351–369. doi:10.1177/0741088309342362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J., Kasman, D., & Shafer, A. (2006). Words and wards: A model of reflective writing and its uses in medical education. Journal of Medical Humanities, 27(4), 231–244. doi:10.1007/s10912-006-9020-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stone, M. H. (1997). In search of patient agency in the rhetoric of diabetes care. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 201–217. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0602_5
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Teston, C. (2012). Moving from artifact to action: A grounded investigation of visual displays of evidence during medical deliberations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 21(3), 187–209. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.650621
   Google Scholar
• Willerton, R. (2008). Writing toward readers’ better health: A case study examining the development of online health information. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 311–334. doi:10.1080/10572250802100428
   Google Scholar