Teaching Writing for the Health Professions: Disciplinary Intersections and Pedagogical Practice

References

• Ahlzén, R. (2007). Medical humanities—Arts and humanistic science. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10(4), 385–393. doi:10.1007/s11019-007-9081-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aldridge, M. D. (2004). Writing and designing readable patient education materials. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 31(4), 373–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angeli, E. L. (2015). Three types of memory in emergency medical services communication. Written Communication, 32(1), 3–38. doi:10.1177/0741088314556598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntfield, M., & Johnston, J. (2016). Healthcare writing: A practical guide to professional success. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Assad, M. K. (2013). Peer review and the “non-specialist reader”: Strategies for developing audience awareness in the writing for the health professions classroom. The CEA Forum, 42(2),119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Association of American Medical Colleges. (2017). Core competencies for entering medical students. Retrieved from https://www.aamc.org/admissions/dataandresearch/477182/corecompetencies.html
   Google Scholar
• Barker, T. (2012). Program assessment: The role of outcomes. Programmatic Perspectives, 4(2), 183–208. Retrieved from http://www.cptsc.org/pp/vol4-2/barker.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beemer, C. (2016). From the margins of healthcare: De-mythicizing cancer online. Peitho, 19(1), 93–127. Retrieved from http://peitho.cwshrc.org/files/2017/01/19.1_Beemer_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blease, C. R. (2016). In defence of utility: The medical humanities and medical education. Medical Humanities, 42(2), 103–108. doi:10.1136/medhum-2015-010827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, R. J. (2015). Writing for today’s healthcare audiences. Peterborough, Canada: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breuch, L. A., Bakke, A., Thomas-Pollei, K., Mackey, L. E., & Weinert, C. (2016). Toward audience involvement: Extending audiences of written physician notes in a hospital setting. Written Communication, 33(4), 418–451. doi:10.1177/0741088316668517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, E. R., & Cagle, L. E. (2016). Teaching a “critical accessibility case study”: Developing disability studies curricula for the technical communication classroom. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(4), 440–463. doi:10.1177/0047281616646750
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. (2009). Medical education and disability studies. Journal of Medical Humanities, 30(4), 221–235. doi:10.1007/s10912-009-9088-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiapperino, L., & Boniolo, G. (2014). Rethinking medical humanities. Journal of Medical Humanities, 35(4), 377–387. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9269-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colton, J. S., & Walton, R. (2015). Disability as insight into social justice pedagogy in technical communication. Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy, 8. Retrieved from https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/disability-as-insight-into-social-justice-pedagogy-in-technical-communication/
   Google Scholar
• Couser, G. T. (2011). What disability studies has to offer medical education. Journal of Medical Humanities, 32(1), 21–30. doi:10.1007/s10912-010-9125-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crick, N., & Gabriel, J. M. (2016). Medical narrative and the rhetoric of identification: The many faces of Anna White Dildane. Health Communication, 31(11), 1318–1326. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1052870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy. New York, NY: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2015). Universal design: Places to start. Disability Studies Quarterly, 35(2). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4632
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, M., & Greaves, D. (1999). Exploring the medical humanities: A new journal will explore a new conception of medicine. British Medical Journal, 319(7219), 1216. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7219.1216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, E. A., & Haas, A. M. (2017). Seeing and knowing the womb: Examining rhetorics of fetal ultrasound toward a decolonization of women’s bodies. Computers and Composition: an International Journal, 43, 88–105. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Garden, R. (2010). Disability and narrative: New directions for medicine and the medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 36(2), 70–74. doi:10.1136/jmh.2010.004143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goering, S. (2015). Rethinking disability: The social model of disability and chronic disease. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 8(2), 134–138. doi:10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heifferon, B. A. (2005). Writing in the health professions. New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, D. P. (2005). Disease versus disability: The medical humanities and disability studies. PMLA, 120(2), 593–598.
   Google Scholar
• Ilyasova, K. A., & Bridgeford, T. (2014). Establishing an outcomes statement for technical communication. In T. Bridgeford, K. S. Kitalong, & B. Williamson (Eds.), Sharing our intellectual traces: Narrative reflections from administrators of professional technical, and scientific communication programs (pp. 53–80). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, A. E., Ivey, M. B., & Zalaquett, C. P. (2013). Intentional interviewing and counseling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrett, C., Redish, J., & Summers, K. (2014). Designing for people who do not read easily. In L. Meloncon (Ed.), Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies (pp. 39–65). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D. (2012). Addressing health literacy in the design of health messages. In H. Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 171–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. N., Moore, K. R., & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalichman, S. C. (2008). Health literacy and AIDS treatment and prevention. In T. Edgar, S. M. Noar, & V. S. Freimuth (Eds.), Communication perspectives on HIV/AIDS for the 21st century (pp. 329–350). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2007). “Cause someday we all die”: Rhetoric, agency, and the case of the “patient” preferences worksheet. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 93(2), 179–210. doi:10.1080/00335630701425100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khetarpal, A. (2012). Disability studies in medical education. International Journal of User-Driven Healthcare, 2(2), 44–51. doi:10.4018/ijudh.2012040105
   Google Scholar
• Kirklin, D. (2004). Editorial: The medical humanities teaching and research agenda: A symbiotic relationship. Medical Humanities, 30(2), 96–97. doi:10.1136/jmh.2004.000175
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longo, B., Weinert, C., & Fountain, T. K. (2007). Implementation of medical research findings through insulin protocols: Initial findings from an ongoing study of document design and visual display. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(4), 435–452. doi:10.2190/V986-K02V-519T-721J
   Google Scholar
• Lubet, A. (2004). Can disability studies survive and prosper within medically modeled criteria? Disability Studies Quarterly, 24(4). doi:10.18061/dsq.v24i4.891
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York, NY: NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (Ed.). (2014). Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L. (2016). Patient experience design: Technical communication’s role in patient health information and education. Intercom, 63(1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Meloncon, L., & Frost, E. A. (2015). Charting an emerging field: The rhetoric of health and medicine and its importance in communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(4), 7–14. doi:10.1145/2826972.2826973
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. doi:10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K. (2013). Exploring accessibility as a potential area of research for technical communication: A modest proposal. Communication Design Quarterly, 1(4), 50–60. doi:10.1145/2524248.2524261
   Google Scholar
• Palmeri, J. (2006). Disability studies, cultural analysis, and the critical practice of technical communication pedagogy. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 49–65. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_5
   Google Scholar
• Popham, S. L., & Graham, S. L. (2008). A structural analysis of coherence in electronic charts in juvenile mental health. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 149–172. doi:10.1080/10572250801904622
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, E. (2010, April 13). APSO needs to replace SOAP in EMRs [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2010/04/11/apso-needs-to-replace-soap-in-emrs/
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. F. (2008). “All on the list”: Uptake in talk about depression. In B. Heifferon & S. C. Brown (Eds.), Rhetoric of healthcare: Essays toward a new disciplinary inquiry (pp. 149–157). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roush, S. E., & Sharby, N. (2011). Disability reconsidered: The paradox of physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 91(12), 1715–1727. doi:10.2522/ptj.20100389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., & Meloncon, L. (2018). Manifesting methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine. In L. Meloncon & J. B. Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., Segal, J. Z., & Keränen, L. (2013). The rhetorics of health and medicine: Inventional possibilities for scholarship and engaged practice. Poroi, 9(1), 1–6. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1157
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2009). Internet health and the 21st century patient: A rhetorical view. Written Communication, 26(4), 351–369. doi:10.1177/0741088309342362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2010). The social model of disability. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 266–273). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T., Iezzoni, L. I., & Groce, N. E. (2009). Disability and the training of health professionals. Lancet, 374(9704), 1815–1816. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62050-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoichet, C.E, Fantz, A., & Yan, H. (2014). Hospital ‘dropped the ball’ with Ebola patient’s travel history, NIH official says. CNN Retrieved fromhttp://www.cnn.com/2014/10/01/health/ebola-us/
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. D. (2012). Guide to clinical documentation (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber, A. (2006). The moral domain of the medical record: The routine ethics evaluation. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(4), W1–W6. doi:10.1080/15265160600843544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terryberry, K. (2004). Writing for the health professsions. Boston, MA: Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Teston, C. (2016). Rhetoric, precarity, and mHealth technologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 251–268. doi:10.1080/02773945.2016.1171694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versel, N. (2014, May 8). Physicians rethinking the progress note: Physicians assess ‘SOAP’ vs. ‘APSO’. Retrieved from http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/rethinking-progress-note
   Google Scholar
• Wailoo, K. (2011). How cancer crossed the color line. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, S. (2010). Toward an accessible pedagogy: Dis/ability, multimodality, and universal design in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 427–454. doi:10.1080/10572252.2010.502090
   Google Scholar
• Wear, D. (2009). The medical humanities: Toward a renewed praxis. Journal of Medical Humanities, 30(4), 209–220. doi:10.1007/s10912-009-9091-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wendell, S. (2001). Unhealthy disabled: Treating chronic illnesses as disabilities. Hypatia, 16, 17–33. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00751.x
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. C. (2000). Making disability visible: How disability studies might transform the medical and science writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(2), 149–161. doi:10.1080/10572250009364691
   Google Scholar
• Yan, H. (2014). 1st Ebola diagnosis in the United States: Should we worry? CNN Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/01/health/ebola-us-no-reason-to-panic/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood, S. A. (2012). Communicating web accessibility to the novice developer: From user experience to application. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(2), 209–232. doi:10.1177/1050651912458924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdenek, S. (2015). Reading sounds: Closed-captioned media and popular culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar