Healing Arts: Rhetorical Techne as Medical (Humanities) Intervention

References

• American Diabetes Association. (n.d.). The burden of diabetes in North Carolina. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://main.diabetes.org/dorg/PDFs/Advocacy/burden-of-diabetes/north-carolina.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Angier, T. (2010). Techne in Aristotle’s ethics: Crafting the moral life. London, UK: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. (2009, September 17). Today, I was diagnosed with diabetes. Retrieved from https://www.fmylife.com/article/today-i-was-diagnosed-with-diabetes-i-went-to-tell-my-grandpa-who-immediately-said-i-m-sorry-l_157655.html
   Google Scholar
• Arduser, L. (2017). Living chronic: Agency and expertise in the rhetoric of diabetes. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2014). Nicomachean ethics (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atwill, J. (1998). Rhetoric reclaimed. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
   Google Scholar
• Atwill, J., and J. Lauer. (1995). Refiguring rhetoric as an art: Aristotle’s concept of techne. in R. J. Gabin (Ed.), Discourse studies in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 25–40). Potomac, MD: Scripta Humanistica.
   Google Scholar
• Atwill, J. M. (2009). Rhetoric reclaimed: Aristotle and the liberal arts tradition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bard College Institute for Writing and Thinking. (2014). Mission. Retrieved May 16, 2014, from http://writingandthinking.org/about/mission/
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J. D., and A. Fuks. (2015). The humanities in medical education: Ways of knowing, doing and being. Journal of Medical Humanities, 36(4), 321–336. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9285-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke, K. (1984). Attitudes toward history (3rd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charon, R. (2008). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, S. (2008). Transactional approach to understanding meanings and benefits of occupation in older adulthood. in S. Coppola, S. Elliott, P. Toto (Eds.), Strategies to advance gerontology excellence (SAGE): Promoting best practice in occupational therapy (pp. 15–58). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutchin, M. P., R. M. Aldrich, A. L. Bailliard, and S. Coppola. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686625
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M., F. Jameson, and C. Lovitt. (1980). On the oppositional practices of everyday life. Social Text, 3, 3–43. doi:10.2307/466341
   Google Scholar
• Detienne, M., and J. P. Vernant. (1978). Cunning intelligence in Greek culture & society, IL, Trans. Janet Lloyd. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. (2009). Metis, Mêtis, Mestiza, Medusa: Rhetorical bodies across rhetorical traditions. Rhetoric Review, 28(1), 1–28. doi:10.1080/07350190802540690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, T. K. (2014). Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. W. (2013). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, C. G. (2017). Introduction to the symposium on engaged rhetoric of science, technology, engineering and medicine. POROI: an International Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, 12(2), 1–15. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1259
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B. (2003). Technological paternalism: On how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(3), 343–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isocrates. (2001). Against the sophists. in P. Bizzell, B. Herzberg (Eds.), The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present (2nd ed., pp. 72–75). Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2010). Scientific characters: Rhetoric, politics, and trust in breast cancer research. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. (1988). The illness narratives: Suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• LeFevre, K. B. (1987). Invention as a social act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malkowski, J. (2014). Beyond prevention: Containment rhetoric in the case of bug chasing. Journal of Medical Humanities, 35(2), 211–228. doi:10.1007/s10912-014-9280-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattingly, C. (1991). The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(11), 998–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. H. (2004). Toward a writing and healing approach in the basic writing classroom: One professor’s personal odyssey. Journal of Basic Writing, 23(2), 93–115.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. H. (2013). Writing and healing from trauma: An interview with James Pennebaker. Composition Forum, 28. Retrieved from http://compositionforum.com.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/issue/28/pennebaker.php
   Google Scholar
• Murray, D. M. (1999). Write to learn (6th ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Papillion, T. (1995). Isocrates’ techne and rhetorical pedagogy. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 25(1–4), 149–163. doi:10.1080/02773949509391038
   Google Scholar
• Pender, K. (2011). Techne, from neoclassicism to postmodernism: Understanding writing as a useful, teachable art. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Writing to heal: A guided journal for recovering from trauma and emotional upheaval. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker, J. W., and J. M. Smyth. (2016). Opening up by writing it down: How expressive writing improves health and eases emotional pain (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, J. (1996). Rhetoric and healing: Revising narratives about disability. College English, 58(7), 820–834. doi:10.2307/378416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200–234. doi:10.1177/0741088393010002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F., L. Lingard, and M. M. Spafford. (2005). Techne or artful science and the genre of case presentations in healthcare settings. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 234–260. doi:10.1080/03637750500120485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B., J. Z. Segal, and L. Keränen. (2013). The rhetorics of health and medicine: Inventional possibilities for scholarship and engaged practice. POROI: An International Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, 9(1), 1–6. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1157
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J. Z. (2009). Internet health and the 21st-century patient: A rhetorical view. Written Communication, 26(4), 351–369. doi:10.1177/0741088309342362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teston, C. (2017). Bodies in flux: Scientific methods for negotiating medical uncertainty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. (1999). Narratives of pain: Trauma and the healing power of writing. The Journal of the Assembly for Expanded Perspectives on Learning, 5(1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• Viney, W., F. Callard, and A. Woods. (2015). Critical medical humanities: Embracing entanglement, taking risks. Medical Humanities, 41(1), 2–7. doi:10.1136/medhum-2015-010692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsop, A. (2002). Art, science, and the existential focus of clinical medicine. Medical Humanities, 28(2), 74–77. doi:10.1136/mh.28.2.74
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wickman, C. (2012). Rhetoric, technê, and the art of scientific inquiry. Rhetoric Review, 31(1), 21–40. doi:10.1080/07350198.2012.630953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar