Advocating for Sustainability: A Report on and Critique of the Undergraduate Capstone Course

References

• Allen, N., & Benninghoff, S. T. (2004). TPC program snapshots: Developing curricula and addressing challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 157–185. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1302_3
   Google Scholar
• Blythe, S., Grabill, J. T., & Riley, K. (2008). Action research and wicked environmental problems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 22(3), 272–298. doi:10.1177/1050651908315973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. A., & Schreiber, J. (2013). Static to dynamic: Professional identity as inventory, invention, and performance in classrooms and workplaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(4), 343–362. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.794089
   Google Scholar
• Bushnell, J. (1999). A contrary view of the technical writing classroom: Notes toward future discussion. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(2), 175–188. doi:10.1080/10572259909364658
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. (2007). Ways of knowing, doing, and writing in the disciplines. College Composition and Communication, 58(3), 385–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, F. (2016). The pedagogy of usability: An analysis of technical communication textbooks, anthologies, and course syllabi and descriptions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 12–28. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W., Elliot, N., Newsham, F., & Klobucar, A. (2016). Programmatic research in technical communication: An interpretive framework for writing program assessment. Programmatic Perspectives, 8(2), 5–45.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, N. W., & Karis, B. (Eds.). (2000). Technical communication, deliberative rhetoric, and environmental discourse: Connections and directions. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, B., & Maid, B. (2009). Assessing outcomes in a technical communication capstone. In C. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 152–166). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• DeVoss, D. N., Julier, L., & Ritz, J. (2013). A professional writing capstone course: The portfolio seminar at Michigan State University. Programmatic Perspectives, 5(1), 123–152.
   Google Scholar
• DeVoss, D. N., McKee, H. A., & Selfe, R. D. (2009). Technology ecologies and sustainability. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, J. M. (2002). More than a knack: Techne & teaching technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(2), 129–145. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1102_2
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, P. (2009). Sustainability and digital technology: Program analysis via a “three-legged” framework: A report on the development and sustainability efforts of the digital technology and culture degree. In D. N. DeVoss, H. A. McKee, & R. D. Selfe (Eds.), Technology ecologies and sustainability (n.p.). Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. (2009). The pedagogical missions of professional and technical communication programs: What we say in the journals and what we say on the web. Programmatic Perspectives, 1(2), 112–138.
   Google Scholar
• Grabill, J. T., & Simmons, W. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. doi:10.1080/10572259809364640
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H., & Conklin, J. (2006). Toward a meaningful model for technical communication. Technical Communication, 53(4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauhart, R. C., & Grahe, J. E. (2015). Designing and teaching undergraduate capstone courses. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Henschel, S., & Melonçon, L. (2014). Of horsemen and layered literacies: Assessment instruments for aligning technical and professional communication undergraduate curricula with professional expectations. Programmatic Perspectives, 6(1), 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Henze, B. R., Sharer, W., & Tovey, J. (2010). Disciplinary identities: Professional writing, rhetorical studies, and rethinking “English”. In D. Franke, A. Reid, & A. DiRenzo (Eds.), Design discourse: Composing and revising programs in professional and technical writing (pp. 63–86). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (2004). (Deeply) sustainable programs, sustainable cultures, sustainable selves: Essaying growth in technical communication. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication, Volume II: Strategies for professional status (pp. 101–119). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Killingsworth, M. J. (2005). From environmental rhetoric to ecocomposition and ecopoetics: Finding a place for professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(4), 359–373. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_1
   Google Scholar
• Kimme Hea, A. C., & Shah, R. W. (2016). Silent partners: Developing a critical understanding of community partners in technical communication service-learning pedagogies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 48–66. doi:10.1080/10572252.2016.1113727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer-Simpson, E., Newmark, J., & Ford, J. D. (2015). Learning beyond the classroom and textbook: Client projects’ role in helping students transition from school to work. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 58(1), 106–122. doi:10.1109/TPC.2015.2423352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L. (2012). Current overview of academic certificates in technical and professional communication in the United States. Technical Communication, 59(3), 207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L. (Ed.). (2013). Rhetorical accessability: At the intersection of technical communication and disability studies. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L. (2014). Curricular challenges of emphasis degrees in technical and professional communication. In T. Bridgeford, K. S. Kitalong, & B. Williamson (Eds.), Sharing our intellectual traces: Narrative reflections from administrators of professional, technical, and scientific, communication programs (pp. 179–200). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L. (2017). TechComm programmatic central. Unpublished raw data.
   Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L., & Henschel, S. (2013). Current state of U.S. undergraduate degree programs in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 45–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. doi:10.2307/375964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, J. (2003). Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication, 50(4), 505–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. (2017). Toward a critical alignment with efficiency philosophies. Technical Communication, 64(1), 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B. (2004). Rearticulating civic engagement through cultural studies and service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 289–306. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_4
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (2006). Introduction: Why cultural studies? Expanding technical communication’s critical toolbox. In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 1–19). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spoel, P., Goforth, D., Cheu, H., & Pearson, D. (2008). Public communication of climate change science: Engaging citizens through apocalyptic narrative explanation. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(1), 49–81. doi:10.1080/10572250802437382
   Google Scholar
• St.Amant, K. (2015). Culture and the contextualization of care: A prototype-based approach to developing health and medical visuals for international audiences. Communication Design Quarterly, 3(2), 38–47. doi:10.1145/2752853.2752858
   Google Scholar
• St.Amant, K., & Melonçon, L. (2016). Reflections on research: Examining practitioner perspectives on the state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication, 63(4), 346–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. L., Martin, M. S., & Anderson, E. R. (2003). Moving from the periphery: Conceptions of ethos, reputation, and identity for the technical communicator. In T. Kynell-Hunt & G. J. Savage (Eds.), Power and legitimacy in technical communication, Volume 1: The historical and contemporary struggle for professional status (pp. 115–136). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S., & Patton, M. D. (2006). Ten engineers reading: Disjunctions between preference and practice in civil engineering faculty responses. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 36(3), 253–271. doi:10.2190/07LL-2K2M-27KH-CX1W
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., & McShane, B. J. (2007). Skills and literacies for the 21st century: Assessing an undergraduate professional and technical writing program. Technical Communication, 54(4), 412–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisser, C., & Grobman, L. (2012). Undergraduate writing majors and the rhetoric of professionalism. Composition Studies, 40(1), 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood, S. A., & Mackiewicz, J. (2013). Lessons in service learning: Developing the service learning opportunities in technical communication (slot-c) database. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 260–283. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.775542
   Google Scholar