Empty Templates: The Ethical Habits of Empty State Pages

References

• Alexander, K. P. (2013). The usability of print and online video instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 237–259. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.775628
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle (2002). Nicomachean ethics. London, UK: Oxford University Press, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Arola, K. L. (2010). The design of web 2.0: The rise of the template, the fall of design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Ballentine, B. D. (2015). Creativity counts: Why study abroad matters to technical and professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 291–305. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.1078846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bay, J., & Rickert, T. (2010). Dwelling with new media. In C. Ball & J. Kalmbach (Eds.), RAW: Reading and writing new media (pp. 117–140). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bay, J. L., & Blackmon, S. (2016). Inhabiting professional writing: Exploring rhetoric, play, and community in second life. In J. De Winter & R. Moeller’s (Eds.), Computer games and technical communication (pp. 211–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, K., & Shepherd, D. (2016). Understanding how algorithms work persuasively through the procedural enthymeme. Computers and Composition, 42, 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, C. G. (2009). Lingua fracta: Towards a rhetoric of new media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. J. (2015). Ethical programs: Hospitality and the rhetorics of software. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. doi:10.3998/dh.13474172.0001.001
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, T. A. M. (2009). Interface as exordium: The rhetoric of interactivity. Computers and Composition, 26(3), 164–173. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, H., & Howard, T. (2017). “Constructivist” research methods for experience architecture and design. In L. Potts & M. J. Salvo (Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 122–143). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. (2016). Updating to remain the same: Habitual new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, J., & Holmes, S. (2018). Rhetoric, Technology, and the Virtues. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolmage, J. T. (2014). Disability rhetoric. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. (2017). The good writer: Virtue ethics and the teaching of writing. College English, 79(3), 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Gallagher, J. R., & Holmes, S. (2018). Virtue ethics. Rhetoric Review, 37(4), 321–392. doi:10.1080/07350198.2018.1497882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyman, D., & Ball, C. E. (2014). Composing for digital publication: Rhetoric, design, code. Composition Studies, 42(1), 114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, B. (1999). Intuitive ethics: Understanding and critiquing the role of intuition in ethical decisions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8(2), 189–202. doi:10.1080/10572259909364659
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. New York, NY: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, T. K. (2014). Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R. (2015a). Five strategies internet writers use to “continue the conversation”. Written Communication, 32(4), 396–425. doi:10.1177/0741088315601006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R. (2015b). The rhetorical template. Computers and Composition, 35(1), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2014.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R. (2017). Challenging the monetized template. Enculturation, (24). Retrieved from http://enculturation.net/challenging_the_monetized_template
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L. (2006). Always already new: Media, history, and the data of culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., & Herndl, C. (2013). Multiple ontologies in pain management: Toward a postplural rhetoric of science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 103–125. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.733674
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., Kim, S.-Y., DeVasto, D. M., & Keith, W. (2015). Statistical genre analysis: Toward big data methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 70–104. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawk, B. (2004). Toward a post-techne-or, inventing pedagogies for professional writing. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(4), 371–392. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1304_2
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, S. (2017). Procedural habits: The rhetoric of videogames as embodied practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. (2009). Design to thrive: Creating social networks and online communities that last. New York, NY: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hunsinger, R. P. (2006). Culture and cultural identity in intercultural technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 31–48. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_4
   Google Scholar
• Ittersum, D. V. (2014). Craft and narrative in DIY instructions. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(3), 227–246. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.798466
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, D. S., Fleming, D., Werner, M., & Sinsheimer‐Weeks, A. (1993). Collaborative argument across the visual‐verbal interface. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(1), 37–49. doi:10.1177/01492063970230030
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 133–147). Retrieved from http://frontdeskapparatus.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Immaterial-Labor-Maurizio-Lazzarato.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCorkle, B. (2012). Whose body? Looking critically at new interface designs. In K. Arola & A. Wysocki (Eds.), Composing (media) = composing (embodiment) (pp. 174–187). Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, P., & Fitz, C. (1993). Using gestalt theory to teach document design and graphics. Technical Communication Quarterly, 2(4), 389–410. doi:10.1080/10572259309364549
   Google Scholar
• Oswal, S. K. (2013). Accessible eportfolios for visually-impaired users: Interface, designs, and infrastructures. In K. V. Wills & R. Rice (Eds.), ePortfolio performance support systems: Constructing, presenting, and assessing portfolios (pp. 135–153). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. A. (2010). A private sphere: Democracy in a digital age. London, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L., & Salvo, M. J. (2017). Introduction. In L. Potts & M. J. Salvo (Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 3–16). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. P. (2014). What can design thinking offer writing studies? College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 612–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reider, D. (2013). From GUI to NUI: Microsoft’s kinect and the politics of the (body as) interface. Present Tense: A Journal of Rhetoric in Society, 1(3), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., Longo, B., & Wills, K. V. (Eds.). (2007). Critical power tools: Technical communication and cultural studies. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selber, S. (2010). A rhetoric of electronic instruction sets. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(2), 95–117. doi:10.1080/10572250903559340
   Google Scholar
• Selfe, C. L., & Selfe, R. J. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480–504. doi:10.2307/358761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidler, M., & Jones, N. (2008). Genetics interfaces: Representing science and enacting public discourse in online spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(1), 28–48. doi:10.1080/10572250802437317
   Google Scholar
• Sorapure, M. (2010). Information visualization, web 2.0, and the teaching of writing. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2009.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. (2017). Beckon, encounter, experience: The danger of control and the promise of encounters in the study of user experience. In L. Potts & M. J. Salvo (Eds.), Rhetoric and experience architecture (pp. 17–40). Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarsa, R. (2015). Upvoting the exordium: Literacy practices of the digital interface. College English, 78(1), 12–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovey, J. (1996). Computer interfaces and visual rhetoric: Looking at the technology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 5(1), 61–76. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq0501_4
   Google Scholar
• Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. (2005). Looking to the future: Electronic texts and the deepening interface. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 327–333. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_11
   Google Scholar
• Winsor, D. (2006). Using writing to structure agency: An examination of engineers’ practice. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 411–430. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_1
   Google Scholar
• Zdenek, S. (2015). Reading sounds: Closed-captioned media and popular culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226312811.001.0001
   Google Scholar