Q-Rhetoric and Controlled Equivocation: Revising “The Scientific Study of Subjectivity” for Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

References

• Anderson, D. (2016). Economic impact of recreational trout angling in the Driftless area. Retrieved from http://www.darestoration.com/documents/Economic%20Impact%20Report%20of%20Trout%20Angling%20in%20the%20Driftless%20Area.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, S., & Boyle, C. (Eds.). (2016). Rhetoric, through everyday things. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. (2002). H. Eiland & M. W. Jennings Walter Benjamin: Selected writings, Volume 3: 1935-1938. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1986). Q technique and method: Principles and procedures. In W. D. Berry & M. S. Lewis-Beck (Eds.), New tools for social scientists: Advances and applications in research methods (pp. 57-76). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91–138.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. R. (2006). A match made in heaven: A marginalized methodology for studying the marginalized. Quality & Quantity, 40, 361–382. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-8828-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble, feminist theory, and psychoanalytic discourse. In L. J. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism (pp. 324–340). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, R., Sallu, S. M., & Goodman, S. (2014). Questioning calls to consensus in conservation: A Q study of conservation discourses on Galápagos. Environmental Conservation, 41(1), 13–26. doi:10.1017/S0376892913000131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinderby, S. (2010). How to reach the ‘hard-to-reach’: The development of Participatory Geographic Information Systems (P-GIS) for inclusive urban design in UK cities. Area, 42(2), 239–251. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00912.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, B. K., Bozek, M. A., & Mitro, M. G. (2013). Influences of riparian vegetation on trout stream temperatures in central Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 33(4), 682–692. doi:10.1080/02755947.2013.785989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. M. (2004). Exploring attitudes: The case for Q methodology. Health Education Research, 20(2), 206–213. doi:10.1093/her/cyg121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. (2014, February 5). Adaptation strategies for brook trout management in the face of climate change. 7th Annual Driftless Area Symposium, La Crosse, WI.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. (2015). Earth beings: Ecologies of practice across Andean worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J., Cook, B., Bracken, L., Cinderby, S., & Donaldson, A. (2015). Combining participatory mapping with Q-methodology to map stakeholder perceptions of complex environmental problems. Applied Geography, 56, 199–208. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffield, S. J., Potter, K. W., & Wang, L. (2005). Predicting the summer temperature of small streams in southwestern Wisconsin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(1), 25–36. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03714.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffield, S. J., Rayne, T. W., Wang, L., & Bradbury, K. R. (2007). Impacts of land use and groundwater flow on the temperature of Wisconsin trout streams final report. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2015). The politics of pain medicine: A rhetorical-ontological inquiry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S. (2016). Object-oriented ontology’s binary duplication and the promise of thing-oriented ontologies. In S. Barnett & C. Boyle (Eds.), Rhetoric, through everyday things (pp. 108–124). Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., & Herndl, C. (2013). Multiple ontologies in pain management: Toward a postplural rhetoric of science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 103–125. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.733674
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães, M. H., McKee, A., Lima, M. L., Vasconcelos, L., Boski, T., & Dentinho, T. (2015). Putting transdisciplinarity into practice: A mixed mode procedure for stakeholder participation in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(10), 1827–1852. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.964850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heasley, L., & Guries, R. P. (1998). Forest tenure and cultural landscapes: Environmental histories in the Kickapoo Valley. In H. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Who owns America: Social conflict over property rights (pp. 182–207). Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. (2013). Keynote: Shifting perspectives: Rethinking indigenous knowledge and politics. International Seminar Workshop on Indigenous Studies, Mandayulong City, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/21293440/shifting_perspectives_rethinking_indigenous_knowledge_and_politics_2014_
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, C. (2018). The role of narratives in socio‐hydrological models of flood behaviors. Water Resources Research, 54(4), 3100–3121. doi:10.1002/2017WR022036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J., Thimble, S. W., & Paine, L. K. (2000). Grass versus trees: Managing riparian areas to benefit streams of central North America. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(4), 919–930. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoullier, D., Anderson, A., & Norman, W. C. (1995). Trout angling in Southwestern Wisconsin and implications for regional development. Madison: Center for Community Economic Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison/Extension, Madison, WI. Retrieved from https://dpla.wisc.edu/facstaff/faculty/marcouiller
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ockwell, D. G. (2008). Opening up policy to reflexive appraisal: A role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia. Policy Sciences, 41, 263–292. doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9066-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramlo, S. E., & Newman, I. (2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34(3), 172–191.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1301–1315. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissman, A. R., & Gillon, S. (2017). Where are ecology and biodiversity in social–Ecological systems research? A review of research methods and applied recommendations. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 86–93. doi:10.1111/conl.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, P., & Krueger, R. (2000). Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. The Professional Geographer, 52(4), 636–648. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmolck, P. (2014). PQMethod (version 2.35). Retrieved from http://schmolck.org/qmethod/
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). A mathematical model of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior; Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, IL, US: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. (1987). Q methodology: Interbehavioral and quantum theoretical connections in clinical psychology. In D. H. Ruben & D. J. Delprato (Eds.), New ideas in therapy: Introduction to an interdisciplinary approach (pp. 95–106). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. S., Westenbroek, S. M., Mitro, M. G., Lyons, J. D., Kammel, L. E., & Buchwald, C. A. (2015). A model for evaluating stream temperature response to climate change in Wisconsin (No. 2014–5186). US Geological Survey. doi:10.3133/sir20145186
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (1999). Property, substance, and effect: Anthropological essays on persons and things. London, UK: Atholone.
   Google Scholar
• Swedeen, P. (2006). Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA. Ecological Economics, 57(2), 190–208. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temp, M. E. (n.d.). Fisheries assessment of the Kickapoo River from the headwaters to Wilton, Wisconsin (Masters thesis). Geographic Information Science. Department of Resource Analysis. St. Mary’s University. Retrieved from http://www.gis.smumn.edu/GradProjects/TempM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. B., & Baas, L. R. (1992). The issue of generalization in Q methodology: “Reliable schematics” revisited. Operant Subjectivity, 16(1), 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• TUDARE. (n.d.). Driftless area restoration effort. Retrieved from https://www.tu.org/tu-projects/driftless-area-restoration-effort
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1955). The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. American Journal of Sociology, 61(2), 167–169. doi:10.1086/221704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, T. S. (2009). The crisis of late structuralism. Perspectivism and animism: Rethinking culture, nature, spirit, and bodiliness. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 7(1), 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. (2014). 2012 Census of Agriculture—County data. Retrieved from https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/
   Google Scholar
• Valley Stewardship Network. (2012). The Kickapoo River Watershed: A focus on water protection and stewardship. Retrieved from http://valleystewardshipnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Water-Protection-and-Stewardship.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Exel, N. J. A., & de Graaf, G. (2005). Q methodology: A sneak preview. Retrieved from www.jobvanexel.nl
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998). Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488. doi:10.2307/3034157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004a). Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484. doi:10.1215/0961754X-10-3-463
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004b). Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 2(1), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). Cannibal metaphysics. ( P. Skafish Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Univocal.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (2013). Summary of public comments on the regional & property analysis. Driftless Area Master Plan. Retrieved from http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/Lands/MasterPlanning/DriftlessStreams/documents/SummaryPublicComments.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. (2014). Trout fishing in Wisconsin: Angler behavior, program assessment and regulation and season preferences. Bureau of Science Services. Bureau of Fisheries Management. Retrieved from http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/fishing/documents/trout/TroutReportJan2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts. (2011). Wisconsin’s changing climate: Impacts and adaptation. Madison: Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved from https://www.wicci.wisc.edu/report/2011_WICCI-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar