Durable, Portable Research through Partnerships with Interdisciplinary Advocacy Groups, Specific Research Topics, and Larger Data Sets

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boettger, R., & Friess, E. (2016). Academics are from Mars, practitioners are from Venus: Analyzing content alignment within technical communication forums. Technical Communication, 63(4), 314–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charney, D. (1996). Empiricism is not a four-letter word. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 567–593. doi:10.2307/358602
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). The basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plan Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (2008). Doing quantitative grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2015). The politics of pain medicine: A rhetorical-ontological inquiry. Chicago,  IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2017). Data and lore in technical communication research. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 5(1), 8–25. doi:10.1145/3090152.3090154
   Google Scholar
• Grant-Davie, K., Matheson, B., & Stephens, E. J. (2017). Helping doctoral students establish long-term identities as technical communication scholars. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 47(2), 151–171. doi:10.1177/0047281617692071
   Google Scholar
• Jason, L. A., & Glenwick, D. S. (2016). Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research. Location: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2014). This weird, incurable disease”: Competing diagnoses in the rhetoric of Morgellons. In T. Jones, L. Friedman, & D. Wear (Eds.), Health humanities reader (pp. 36–49). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, N. (2015). The US intelligence community’s mathematical ideology of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 217–234. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.1044122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, C. (2016). Correspondence analysis: A statistical technique ripe for technical and professional communication researchers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(3), 299–310. doi:10.1109/TPC.2016.2583279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of science studies to the social sciences. The British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–526. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melonçon, L., & St. Amant, K. (2018). Empirical research in technical and professional communication: A 5-year examination of research methods and a call for research sustainability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 1–28. doi:10.1177/0047281618764611
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2003). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke U Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, C. (2015). “I just really love my spirit”: A rhetorical inquiry into dissociative identity disorder, Rhetoric Review, 34(4), 462-478. doi:10.1080/07350198.2015.1074027
   Google Scholar
• Pauwels, E. (2011). The value of science and technology studies (STS) to sustainability research: A critical approach toward synthetic biology promises. In C. C. Jaeger, J. D. Tàbara, & J. Jaeger (Eds.), European research on sustainable development: Volume 1: Transformative science approaches for sustainability (pp. 111–135). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19202-9_9
   Google Scholar
• Rude, C. D. (2015). Building identity and community through research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(4), 366–380. doi:10.1177/0047281615585753
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Amant, K., & Melonçon, L. (2016a). Addressing the incommensurable. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 267–283. doi:10.1177/0047281616639476
   Google Scholar
• St. Amant, K., & Melonçon, L. (2016b). Reflecting on research: Examining practitioner perspectives on the state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication, 63(4), 346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkup, K. L., & Cannon, P. (2018). Health ecologies in addiction treatment: Rhetoric of health and medicine and conceptualizing care. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(1), 108–120. doi:10.1080/10572252.2018.1401352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340. doi:10.1177/0306312713488820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar