Durable Research, Portable Findings: Rhetorical Methods in Case Study Research

References

• ARSTonline. (2013, April 15). ARST oral history project–an interview with Dr. Randy Harris. [Video file] Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNW5yUvW-is
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2016). Afterword: Social changes in science communication: Rattling the information chain. In A. G. Gross & J. Buehl (Eds.), Science and the internet: Communicating knowledge in a digital age (pp. 267–282). Amityville, NY: Baywood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., & Wouters, P. (2007). Not another case study: A middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of e-science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(6), 672–692. doi:10.1177/0162243907306188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Burian, R. M. (2001). The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 383–404. doi:10.1162/106361401760375794
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1984). Permanence and change: An anatomy of purpose. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. A. (1999). Response to Simons. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 85(1), 101–103. doi:10.1080/00335639909384244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric the cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2011). Manufactured scientific controversy: Science, rhetoric, and public debate. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 14(2), 195–228. doi:10.1353/rap.2010.0222
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli, L. (2017). Defending science: How the art of rhetoric can help. http://theconversation.com/defending-science-how-the-art-of-rhetoric-can-help-68210
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. D., Dienes, Z., McIntosh, R. D., Rotshtein, P., & Willmes, K. (2015). Registered reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing. Cortex, 66, A1–A2. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, J. (2005). Reclaiming rhetoric of science and technology: Knowing in and about the world. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 295–302. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_7
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. (2012). The golem: what you should know about science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, C., Lynch, J., & Winderman, E. (2012). Recent rhetorical studies in public understanding of science: Multiple purposes and strengths. Public Understanding of Science, 21(4), 386–400. doi:10.1177/0963662512437330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark, V. L. P., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264. doi:10.1177/0011000006287390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2007a). Confucius’s virtue-centered rhetoric: A case study of mixed research methods in comparative rhetoric. Rhetoric Review, 26(2), 142–159. doi:10.1080/07350190709336706
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2007b). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1986). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 3(3), 275–296. doi:10.1177/0741088386003003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaonkar, D. P. (1993). The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science. In A. G. Gross & W. Keith (Eds.), Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science (pp. 25–85). Albany, NY: SUNY Press. doi:10.1080/10417949309372909
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G. (1994). The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 3(1), 3–23. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/001
   Google Scholar
• Gross, A. G. (2006). Starring the text: The place of rhetoric in science studies. Carbondale, IN: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (1997). Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: Case studies. Davis, California: Hermagoras Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2002). Knowing, rhetoric, science. In J. Williams (Ed.), Visions and revisions: Issues in rhetoric and composition (pp. 163–218). Carbondale, In Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2005). Rhetoric and incommensurability. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2012, June 1–3). Rhetoric, incommensurability, and the curious case of David Brewster. Keynote presented at Incommensurability 50. Taipei (Taiwan).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. A. (2018). Landmark essays on rhetoric of science: case studies, 2nd. London, UK:Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartelius, E. J. (2010). The rhetoric of expertise. Boulder, CO: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herndl, C. G., Fennell, B. A., & Miller, C. R. (1991). Understanding failures in organizational discourse. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 279–305). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamnik, M. R., & Lane, D. J. (2017). The use of Reddit as an inexpensive source for high-quality data. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(5), 1–10. ISSN:1531-7714.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. B. (Ed.). (2012). A handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchenham, A. D. (2012). Mixed methods in case study research. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 562–564). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412957397
   Google Scholar
• MacNealy, M. S. (1997). Toward better case study research. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 40(3), 182–196. doi:10.1109/47.649554
   Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, B. (2010). Technology and instruction: Designed for everyday learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. doi:10.2307/375964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1995). A comment on positivists, postmodernists, Aristotelians, and the challenger disaster. College English, 57(5), 603–605. doi:10.2307/378835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intentional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 205–242. doi:10.1023/A:1015241914483
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–141. doi:10.1093/cje/bep058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelli, L. (2013). The prospect of invention in rhetorical studies of science, technology, and medicine. Poroi, 9(1), 1–10. doi:10.13008/2151-2957.1164
   Google Scholar
• Schriver, K. A. (2017). Plain language in the US gains momentum: 1940–2015. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60(4), 343–383. doi:10.1109/TPC.2017.2765118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 443–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, A., & Gross, A. (1995). Arthur Walzer and Alan Gross respond. College English, 57(5), 605–606. doi:10.2307/378836
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, A. E., & Gross, A. (1994). Positivists, postmodernists, Aristotelians, and the challenger disaster. College English, 56(4), 420–433. doi:10.2307/378336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn, J. (2017). Rhetoric of science bibliography (2013–2018). http://www.arstmonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ARSTM%20New%20Book%20List%202013-18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (1989). Sheepfarming after chernobyl: a case study in communicating scientific information. Environment: science and policy for sustainable development. 31(2), 10-39.
   Google Scholar