Disconnecting to Connect: Developing Postconnectivist Tactics for Mobile and Networked Technical Communication

References

• Barta, K., & Neff, G. (2016). Technologies for sharing: Lessons from quantified self about the political economy of platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 19(4), 518–531. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1118520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, S. (2008). An introduction to connective knowledge. In T. Hug (Ed.), Media, knowledge & education: Exploring new spaces, relations and dynamics in digital media ecologies (pp. 77–102). Innsbruck, Germany: Innsbruck University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duin, A. H., & Moses, J. (2015). Intercultural connectivism. Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization, 7(1), 29–46. ISSN: 2153-9480.
   Google Scholar
• Fraiberg, S. (2017). Start-up nation: Studying transnational entrepreneurial practices in Israel’s start-up ecosystem. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 350–388. doi:10.1177/1050651917695541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getto, G., & Sun, H. (2017). Designing for everyday life in global contexts. Rhetoric, Professional Communication and Globalization, 10(1), 1–4. ISSN: 2153-9480.
   Google Scholar
• Gouge, C., & Jones, J. (2016). Wearables, wearing, and the rhetorics that attend to them. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 46(3), 199–206. doi:10.1080/02773945.2016.1171689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2017). Data and lore in technical communication research. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(1), 8–25. doi:10.1145/3090152.3090154
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Kim, S., DeVasto, D., & Keith, W. (2015). Statistical genre analysis: Toward big data methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 70–104. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, L. (2015). Still life with rhetoric: A new materialist approach for visual rhetorics. Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, L., & Brooke, C. (2018). Circulation, writing and rhetoric. Salt Lake City: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. E. (2015). Exposed: Desire and disobedience in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesselberth, P. (2017). Discourses on disconnectivity and the right to disconnect. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1–17. doi:10.1177/1461444817711449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J., & Gouge, C. (2018). Wearable technologies and communication design. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(4), 4–14. doi:10.1145/3188387.3188388
   Google Scholar
• Kennemer, Q. (2018). Google’s digital wellbeing initiative: Everything you need to know. Retrieved from: https://www.androidcentral.com/googles-digital-wellbeing.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. (2017). Tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 1–7. doi:10.1080/10572252.2017.1259428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. A. (2006). Cars, culture, and tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 67–86. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_6
   Google Scholar
• Krug, S. (2014). Don’t make me think, revisited: A common sense approach to web usability. San Francisco, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauer, C., & Brumberger, E. (2016). Technical communication as user experience in a broadening industry landscape. Technical Communication, 63(3), 248–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mara, A., & Hawk, B. (2010). Posthuman rhetorics and technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/10572250903373031
   Google Scholar
• Meijas, U. (2013). Off the network: Disrupting the digital world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, J., Miller, R., Jensen, B., & Shah, V. (2018). Decisions, decisions: Cybervetting through the eyes of students. Journal of Education for Business, 93(5), 252–259. doi:10.1080/08832323.2018.1442785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (2017). New French law bars work email after hours. Retrieved from: http://fortune.com/2017/01/01/french-right-to-disconnect-law/
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, D. (2017). Network sense: Methods for visualizing a discipline. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Okoshi, T., Ramos, J., Nozaki, H., Nakazawa, J., Dey, A. K., & Tokuda, H. (2015, September). Reducing users’ perceived mental effort due to interruptive notifications in multi-device environments. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Umeda, Osaka, Japan (pp. 475–486). Osaka, Japan: ACM. doi:10.1145/2750858.2807517
   Google Scholar
• Okoshi, T., Tsubouchi, K., Taji, M., Ichikawa, T., & Tokuda, H. (2017, March). Attention and engagement-awareness in the wild: A large-scale study with adaptive notifications. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Osaka, Japan (pp. 100–110). Osaka, Japan: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/PERCOM.2017.7917856
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, I. (2013). Ready to wear: A rhetoric of wearable computers and reality‐shifting media. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pflugfelder, E. H. (2016). Communicating mobility and technology: A material rhetoric for persuasive transportation. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, L. (2014). Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Read, S., & Swarts, J. (2015). Visualizing and tracing: Research methodologies for the study of networked, sociotechnical activity, otherwise known as knowledge work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 14–44. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, G., & Barnum, C. (2011). Overlap, influence, intertwining: The interplay of UX and technical communication. Journal of Usability Studies, 6, 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Rettberg, J. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. (2009). Woodward paths: Motorizing space. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 224–241. doi:10.1080/10572250902942000
   Google Scholar
• Rice, R., & St.Amant, K. (Eds.). (2018). Thinking globally, composing locally: Rethinking online writing in the age of the global Internet. Boulder: University Press of Colorado/Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickert, T. (2013). Ambient rhetoric: The attunements of rhetorical being. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schüll, N. D. (2014). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shalamova, N. (2016). Blending engineering content with design thinking and UX to maximize student engagement in a technical communication class. In 2016 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), Austin, Texas (pp. 1–5). New York, NY: IEEE. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2016.7740493
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(2), 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, C. (2009). How social media can make history. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1994 [1909]). Bridge and door. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(1), 5–10. doi:10.1177/026327694011001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. (2015). All edge: Inside the new workplace networks. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• St.Amant, K., & Meloncon, L. (2016). Reflections on research: Examining practitioner perspectives on the state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication, 63(4), 346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swarts, J. (2007). Mobility and composition: The architecture of coherence in non-places. Technical Communication Quarterly, 16(3), 279–309. doi:10.1080/10572250701291020
   Google Scholar
• Verhulsdonck, G. (2015). From cultural markers to global mobile: Using interaction design for composing mobile designs in global contexts. Computers and Composition, 38(B), 140–150. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Verhulsdonck, G. (2017). Designing for global mobile: Considering user experience mapping with infrastructure, global openness, local user contexts and local cultural beliefs of technology use. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(3), 55–62. doi:10.1145/3188173.3188179
   Google Scholar